Definitive and Provisional teachings

General discussion, particularly exploring the Dharma in the modern world.
[N.B. This is the forum that was called ‘Exploring Buddhism’. The new name simply describes it better.]

Definitive and Provisional teachings

Postby Ratnagerald » Fri May 31, 2013 2:39 pm

Hi,

The Mahayana teachings are sometimes classified as either "nitartha" (definitive) or "neyartha" (provisional). Whether a Sutra belongs to one or the other classification seems to depend on which school of Buddhism you follow.

I also recently came across the following Pali Sutta:

"Monks, these two slander the Tathagata. Which two? He who explains a discourse whose
meaning needs to be inferred as one whose meaning has already been fully drawn out.
And he who explains a discourse whose meaning has already been fully drawn out as one
whose meaning needs to be inferred. These are two who slander the Tathagata."
("Neyyatha Sutta: A Meaning to be Inferred" (AN 2.25),translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight, 8 August 2010, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html . Retrieved on 31 May 2013.)

What guidelines can we employ in order to avoid misinterpreting a Sutra?

Gassho,
Ratnagerald
User avatar
Ratnagerald
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 1:45 pm

Re: Definitive and Provisional teachings

Postby dude » Fri May 31, 2013 6:06 pm

"What guidelines can we employ in order to avoid misinterpreting a Sutra?"

Look at the words of the sutras, not what this or that school says about the sutras.
dude
 
Posts: 582
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 3:38 am

Re: Definitive and Provisional teachings

Postby lobster » Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:08 pm

What guidelines can we employ in order to avoid misinterpreting a Sutra?


Read from the Heart. :twothumbsup:
User avatar
lobster
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:06 pm


Return to Dharma in Everyday Life

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: smcj and 12 guests

>