Achieving Epistemic Certainty
Achieving Epistemic Certainty
Is there a type of knowledge that can be attained whereby one knows with absolute certainty that something is true?
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
You mean like a "psychic" or "mental" all puprose lie detector?
I think you'll find it is called omniscience and is something that is achieved at Buddhahood.
I think you'll find it is called omniscience and is something that is achieved at Buddhahood.
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
I'm not sure if you would necessarily need to be omniscient to know something with absolute certainty. For example how can I attain a knowledge (that is impossible to doubt), whereby I know that Nirvana is a permanent state of the highest happiness?
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
I think "happiness" is somewhat inaccurate since it is related to human vission.charles wrote:I'm not sure if you would necessarily need to be omniscient to know something with absolute certainty. For example how can I attain a knowledge (that is impossible to doubt), whereby I know that Nirvana is a permanent state of the highest happiness?
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
By achieving that state, until then it is a matter of faith or belief which may be fortified with some personal glimpses of this reality.charles wrote:I'm not sure if you would necessarily need to be omniscient to know something with absolute certainty. For example how can I attain a knowledge (that is impossible to doubt), whereby I know that Nirvana is a permanent state of the highest happiness?
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
No. Either there is knowledge or not.charles wrote:Is there a type of knowledge that can be attained whereby one knows with absolute certainty that something is true?
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
I'm not sure what you mean here, can you elaborate?ground wrote:No. Either there is knowledge or not.charles wrote:Is there a type of knowledge that can be attained whereby one knows with absolute certainty that something is true?
Maybe I can rephrase this: Can I know?charles wrote:Is there a type of knowledge that can be attained whereby one knows with absolute certainty that something is true?
Last edited by charles on Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:39 am, edited 7 times in total.
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
Do you mean "vision"? Inaccurate in what sense?alpha wrote:I think "happiness" is somewhat inaccurate since it is related to human vission.charles wrote:I'm not sure if you would necessarily need to be omniscient to know something with absolute certainty. For example how can I attain a knowledge (that is impossible to doubt), whereby I know that Nirvana is a permanent state of the highest happiness?
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
As I understand it is inaccurate because what we usually call "happiness" is not the same thing as Nirvana. If we imagine Nirvana to be like very-very strong worldly happiness, we are making an error. Nirvana is supposed to be infinitely better, but also entirely different. Or so I heard.charles wrote:Do you mean "vision"? Inaccurate in what sense?alpha wrote:I think "happiness" is somewhat inaccurate since it is related to human vission.charles wrote:I'm not sure if you would necessarily need to be omniscient to know something with absolute certainty. For example how can I attain a knowledge (that is impossible to doubt), whereby I know that Nirvana is a permanent state of the highest happiness?
Please consider donating to help find a cure for Degenerative Vitreous Syndrome:
http://www.gofundme.com/floaters
http://www.gofundme.com/floaters
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
No.I meant happiness.charles wrote:Do you mean "vision"? Inaccurate in what sense?alpha wrote:I think "happiness" is somewhat inaccurate since it is related to human vission.charles wrote:I'm not sure if you would necessarily need to be omniscient to know something with absolute certainty. For example how can I attain a knowledge (that is impossible to doubt), whereby I know that Nirvana is a permanent state of the highest happiness?
How can you possibly describe it if is beyond human vision?
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
The point about this issue is that it is not 'knowledge' in the detached objective sense. It is not knowledge of some proposition in the abstract, nor of a formula. in yogic terminology, it is a form of knowledge within which the knower and the object of knowledge are no longer separate. So you can't actually tell in advance whether or not you can be certain in that regard. I think, to put it colloquially, you have to die trying. This is expressed in such sayings as 'dying to the known'.charles wrote:I'm not sure if you would necessarily need to be omniscient to know something with absolute certainty. For example how can I attain a knowledge (that is impossible to doubt), whereby I know that Nirvana is a permanent state of the highest happiness?
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
I'm confused. When I wrote:alpha wrote: No.I meant happiness.
How can you possibly describe it if is beyond human vision?
I meant if here:charles wrote: Do you mean "vision"?
did you mean "vision" instead of "vission"?alpha wrote: human vission.
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
alpha wrote: I think "happiness" is somewhat inaccurate since it is related to human vission.
Are you suggesting that it is somewhat inaccurate to describe Nirvana with the word "happiness"?alpha wrote: How can you possibly describe it if is beyond human vision?
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
That's correct.charles wrote:I'm confused. When I wrote:alpha wrote: No.I meant happiness.
How can you possibly describe it if is beyond human vision?I meant if here:charles wrote: Do you mean "vision"?did you mean "vision" instead of "vission"?alpha wrote: human vission.
I've misspelled vision
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
Yes .charles wrote:alpha wrote: I think "happiness" is somewhat inaccurate since it is related to human vission.Are you suggesting that it is somewhat inaccurate to describe Nirvana with the word "happiness"?alpha wrote: How can you possibly describe it if is beyond human vision?
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
I may be nitpicking here, but it would be good to precisely define what knowledge, attainment, certainty, truth, or meaning is, before trying to answer such question. Now, after thoroughly investigating those, we can see them as empty ideas, imagined balls. This imagination creates entire world of joy and sorrow, truth and falsehood, certainty end doubt, attainment and failure. Every question and answer is a part of it. We can conclude that is such knowledge exists, it is just another imagined ballcharles wrote:Is there a type of knowledge that can be attained whereby one knows with absolute certainty that something is true?
Is it worth striving for? Maybe it is, all depends on how we define "worth". Is "worth" worth striving for?
Last edited by oushi on Sun Apr 28, 2013 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Say what you think about me here.
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
What is your use of "it" referring to here?jeeprs wrote:The point about this issue is that it is not 'knowledge' in the detached objective sense. It is not knowledge of some proposition in the abstract, nor of a formula. in yogic terminology, it is a form of knowledge within which the knower and the object of knowledge are no longer separate.charles wrote:I'm not sure if you would necessarily need to be omniscient to know something with absolute certainty. For example how can I attain a knowledge (that is impossible to doubt), whereby I know that Nirvana is a permanent state of the highest happiness?
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
//I think you edited the post I was replying to, whilst I was in the act of replying. So the 'well, yes', refers to a question which is no longer posted.//
Well, yes, but it is important to 'situate' your question. You're asking, 'can I be certain', is there some 'knowledge which is absolute', and so on. As it happens, I do believe that - I believe that the Buddha realizes that state of supreme knowledge. But the point is, for us sentient beings, this is really not that meaningful as a belief or even as a proposition. Say you assert that 'The Buddha has some knowledge of the absolute.' What does that actually mean? It is something beyond verbal discourse, isn't it? So simply to assert that it is so, or to deny it, for that matter, is not that meaningful.
So what I'm getting at is this: if you're looking for some way to know upfront whether or not knowledge of that type is possible, I don't think you're going to get an answer. You have to actually try and find out yourself. That is what a great deal of the Buddhist path consist of - coming to understand or know something. But you have to know it by trying it out.
That is the meaning of 'Ehipassiko' - come and see.
What has happened a lot in philosophy is that we have taken verbal formulae and propositions as being real in their own right. But they're no more real than the menu description of a meal. You can't argue about what is the best meal on the basis of reading a menu. You have to eat.
Hope I'm intepreting your question correctly.
Well, yes, but it is important to 'situate' your question. You're asking, 'can I be certain', is there some 'knowledge which is absolute', and so on. As it happens, I do believe that - I believe that the Buddha realizes that state of supreme knowledge. But the point is, for us sentient beings, this is really not that meaningful as a belief or even as a proposition. Say you assert that 'The Buddha has some knowledge of the absolute.' What does that actually mean? It is something beyond verbal discourse, isn't it? So simply to assert that it is so, or to deny it, for that matter, is not that meaningful.
So what I'm getting at is this: if you're looking for some way to know upfront whether or not knowledge of that type is possible, I don't think you're going to get an answer. You have to actually try and find out yourself. That is what a great deal of the Buddhist path consist of - coming to understand or know something. But you have to know it by trying it out.
That is the meaning of 'Ehipassiko' - come and see.
What has happened a lot in philosophy is that we have taken verbal formulae and propositions as being real in their own right. But they're no more real than the menu description of a meal. You can't argue about what is the best meal on the basis of reading a menu. You have to eat.
Hope I'm intepreting your question correctly.
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
I'm asking a question on whether or not this type of knowledge is possible; if it is possible, I'm curious as to the path one must walk to achieve this. What is(are) the path(s) suggested by Buddhism to achieve this? Can anyone here give references to Buddhist texts or Buddhists that discuss this?jeeprs wrote:So what I'm getting at is this: if you're looking for some way to know upfront whether or not knowledge of that type is possible, I don't think you're going to get an answer. You have to actually try and find out yourself. That is what a great deal of the Buddhist path consist of - coming to understand or know something. But you have to know it by trying it out.
Re: Achieving Epistemic Certainty
The kind of knowledge that arises from direct knowing, that arises, emerges, from the Dharma, as circumstance dictates, as opposed to that kind of book knowledge that is programmed into your brain, into what we could call your brain's memory databank, through careful study and training?
I recall some patriarchal zen texts touching on this, but not specifically which one.. Perhaps the Platform Sutra of the 6th Patriarch, which you can conveniently find in book form with the wonderful Diamond Sutra, or not, as you see fit!
I recall some patriarchal zen texts touching on this, but not specifically which one.. Perhaps the Platform Sutra of the 6th Patriarch, which you can conveniently find in book form with the wonderful Diamond Sutra, or not, as you see fit!
Disclaimer: If I have posted about something, then I obviously have no idea what I am talking about!