Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 6:16 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:49 pm
Posts: 31
dalai lama has said that own enligthenment for just oneself isnt real enligthenment. Why´s that`?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:08 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:53 am
Posts: 1468
He means practicing a path for ones own gain and not helping other people. Plenty of Theravada Buddhists do Bodhisattva work helping other people. And plenty of Mahayana Buddhists are selfish and only after personal gain and vica versa. This is what we call the human condition. :smile: I'm a Mahayana Buddhist, sometimes I can be really selfish but other times I can be very generious. It's part of my practice to not be so selfish :smile:

Gassho,
Seishin.

_________________
http://tendaiuk.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:53 am
Posts: 245
[*]
villkorkarma wrote:
dalai lama has said that own enligthenment for just oneself isnt real enligthenment. Why´s that`?


Guatam buddha trained disciples in Thervada meditation till they reached an important station of
an Arhat/ Arihant. This stage is where one gets to know himself and we say that he is enlightend.

But Buddhism starts therafter on Mahayana path for benefit for others and Nirvana is the end station.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:50 pm
Posts: 371
villkorkarma wrote:
dalai lama has said that own enligthenment for just oneself isnt real enligthenment. Why´s that`?


The Buddha taught no-self, he rediscovered a path one may follow to eradicate the ego. An enlightened or fully awakened being has completely purified mind, and eradicated the ego, this has benifit for all living beings. One who thinks "I" am enlightened is under the delusion of the ego, this is not real enlightenment.

There is no difference between Theravaden and Mahayana Buddhism, but the "I" will find some for sure. :smile:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:41 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Posts: 2995
Location: British Columbia
I have a problem with the title. I think there are certainily enlightened Theravadins, perhaps more so than many other branches of Buddhism. And I doubt very much that the Dalai Lama meant what you think he did.

_________________
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:39 pm
Posts: 92
villkorkarma wrote:
dalai lama has said that own enligthenment for just oneself isnt real enligthenment. Why´s that`?

Source / link ?

Think he is talking about "FULL" enlightenment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 5:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:28 am
Posts: 2327
Location: the Netherlands and India
The source or link would be great to have. It is very difficult to comment given we only have one sentence of information. Context of the remark will help us understand better the full import of HH´s words.

_________________
In order to ensure my mind never comes under the power of the self-cherishing attitude,
I must obtain control over my own mind.
Therefore, amongst all empowerments, the empowerment that gives me control over my mind is the best,
and I have received the most profound empowerment with this teaching.
-Atisha Dipamkara
brtsal ba'i bkhra drin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:49 pm
Posts: 31
My mistake, iI wrote wrong, dalai lama said: its important to help other people. according to my own way It isnt right to not be helpfull to other beings
book is called my way to sucess.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:29 am
Posts: 148
It is believed that Buddhaghosha, the famous Theravadin monk, who translated many Sri Lankan Buddhist scriptures into Pali and wrote Vishuddhimagga, eventually went to Tusita heaven to meet Maitreya and start coursing through the Bodhisattva Path to attain Buddhahood.

The disciples of Buddha were not "Theravada", "Hinayana" or "Mahayana", they were just termed Arhats. Buddha himself used to characterize himself as a perfect "Arhat". I think all these differences have more to do with etymology of terms, than to the notions associated with them. For example, the English word "nice" once used to refer to something bad!

I think the peculiarity of the term "Bodhisattva" lies in the fact that even lay disciples can be referred by this term unlike Arhats who can only be monks or nuns. Till you reach the 9th Bodhisattva Bhumi, you are still less spiritually attained than an Arhat. That says a lot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 172
Any student who practices well is worthy of respect no matter what tradition their in, IMO, and any student who genuinely wishes to attain to the practices, insights and truths of the practice is worthy of help IMO.
Regardless of tradition or label, which was always just an after-the-fact requirement anyway, not reflective of the actual (living) status. IMO.

Best wishes,
Abu

_________________
Floating Bo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:03 am
Posts: 933
You're putting the cart before the horse. First there is enlightenment then the revelation there is no other, as all is one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:15 am
Posts: 227
According to the previous Kalu Rinpoche the hinayana path doesnt get full complete enlighments because they don't fully attain the realization of shunyata. The shravaka path leads to the realization of emptiness of self but not of all phenomena, resulting in arhatship. The pratyekabuddha path leads to the realization of no self and a partial realization of emptiness of phenomena. They came to see all phenomena as made by small particules or atoms. Although they are high realized beeings the cant help much because of state of arahat is almost static and it lucks in communication.

This is what ive read in "fundaments of tibetan buddhism" by kalu rinpoche.

Sory about my english


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 4:12 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Posts: 4612
Location: Baltimore, MD
Rakshasa wrote:
I think the peculiarity of the term "Bodhisattva" lies in the fact that even lay disciples can be referred by this term unlike Arhats who can only be monks or nuns.


Lay disciples can in fact become Arhats. However in the Theravadin tradition it is taught that a lay person attaining Arhathood has to become a monk or nun within a short time (like a day) or else they would die. I don't know what they base this on however. But technically lay disciples can in fact become Arhats.

Kirt

_________________
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 5:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:30 am
Posts: 1355
kirtu wrote:
Lay disciples can in fact become Arhats. However in the Theravadin tradition it is taught that a lay person attaining Arhathood has to become a monk or nun within a short time (like a day) or else they would die. I don't know what they base this on however. But technically lay disciples can in fact become Arhats.

Kirt
A reason to be grateful to the early Kagyu gurus, Padmasambhava, the 84 Mahasiddhas and so forth for their examples. Thus, Mahayanists and especially Vajrayanists believe the inner meaning is more important than the outer form.

_________________
Equanimity is the ground. Love is the moisture. Compassion is the seed. Bodhicitta is the result.

-Paraphrase of Khensur Rinpoche Lobsang Tsephel citing the Guhyasamaja Tantra

"All memories and thoughts are the union of emptiness and knowing, the Mind.
Without attachment, self-liberating, like a snake in a knot.
Through the qualities of meditating in that way,
Mental obscurations are purified and the dharmakaya is attained."

-Ra Lotsawa, All-pervading Melodious Drumbeats


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 2:50 am
Posts: 545
Location: Los Angeles, CA
kirtu wrote:
However in the Theravadin tradition it is taught that a lay person attaining Arhathood has to become a monk or nun within a short time (like a day) or else they would die.

To be frank, it sounds like it just exists to create sectarian superiority.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:16 am
Posts: 185
Location: The Middle of Nowhere
villkorkarma wrote:
dalai lama has said that own enligthenment for just oneself isnt real enligthenment. Why´s that`?


Funny because Theravada was around before Mahayana.

_________________
A person once asked me why I would want to stop rebirth. "It sounds pretty cool. Being able to come back. Who wouldn't want to be reborn."
I replied. "Wanting to be reborn is like wanting to stay in a jail cell, when you have the chance to go free and experience the whole wide world. Does a convict, on being freed from his shabby, constricting, little cell, suddenly say "I really want to go back to jail and be put in a cell. It sounds pretty cool. Being able to come back. Who wouldn't want that?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
kirtu wrote:
Lay disciples can in fact become Arhats. However in the Theravadin tradition it is taught that a lay person attaining Arhathood has to become a monk or nun within a short time (like a day) or else they would die. I don't know what they base this on however. But technically lay disciples can in fact become Arhats.

Kirt


In Chinese I've read one eminent author who insists that arhatship isn't possible without formal renunciation.

I think what they mean is that they need to take up celibacy and eliminate all lust, though I don't see why formal renunciation would be necessary for that.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 12:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 3:14 pm
Posts: 853
This is current by the Milinda Panha but although there were early Buddhists who held opposing opinions on the idea of lay arhats remaining outside formal renunciation as preserved in the Kathavatthu.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Posts: 732
Location: South Florida, USA
I don't ever recall the Dalai Lama saying theravada buddhist doesn't get real enlightenment. What he is saying IMO, is that selfish people don't get real enlightenment, which is quite reasonable to say. :)

_________________
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:47 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Posts: 4612
Location: Baltimore, MD
tomamundsen wrote:
kirtu wrote:
However in the Theravadin tradition it is taught that a lay person attaining Arhathood has to become a monk or nun within a short time (like a day) or else they would die.

To be frank, it sounds like it just exists to create sectarian superiority.


Howso?

_________________
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group