Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 6:02 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
dharmagoat wrote:
Astus wrote:
Saying that what the Buddha and Dogen taught are not what they believed and realised is saying that they were speaking lies.

Just to be clear, I am challenging the claim that we can know what the Buddha and Dogen believed based on what they taught.

The Buddha taught different things to different people depending on their needs and understanding. Sometimes his teachings were contradictory. Was he lying to some and not to others, or was he exercising skillful means in each case?


In actuality, Dharmagoat does not believe that the Buddha and Dogen did not believe in rebirth, just like Simon E. Even though there are written records on some web forums that claimed they said that, we do not know for sure if they really thought that way. If fact, both of them are probably true traditionists and fully accept the dependent origination teachings where beings are reborn in accordance with their ripened karma.

E ma ho!

:smile:

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
I have it on the very best authority that Simon E. does not, and has never, existed.
Simon E. is a dream figure who is dreaming that he has created a cyberperson with whom he identifies for reasons of convention.

:namaste:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 5:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm
Posts: 5771
Simon E. wrote:
I have it on the very best authority that Simon E. does not, and has never, existed.
Simon E. is a dream figure who is dreaming that he has created a cyberperson with whom he identifies for reasons of convention.

:namaste:


:twothumbsup:

On this point, I think we can all agree.

Yours truly,
another dream figure

_________________
Need help getting on retreat? Want to support others in practice? Pay the Dana for Dharma forum a visit...

viewtopic.php?f=114&t=13727


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Posts: 732
Location: South Florida, USA
tomamundsen wrote:
Brad just blogged about this topic again yesterday - http://suicidegirlsblog.com/blog/brad-w ... r-you-die/


Sounds more like "Bradism" rather than Buddhism. :)

_________________
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
Astus wrote:
dharmagoat wrote:
Just to be clear, I am challenging the claim that we can know what the Buddha and Dogen believed based on what they taught.

The Buddha taught different things to different people depending on their needs and understanding. Sometimes his teachings were contradictory. Was he lying to some and not to others, or was he exercising skillful means in each case?

Skilful means doesn't mean it is not true, but that it is not the final teaching. The path is a gradual one, so one should not stop on level one. And just because there are further levels, the higher ones don't invalidate the lowers, but rather give them context and further meaning. Also, if the Buddha spoke anything that was not true, he failed to uphold the basic precepts, and that is impossible.

So the original question remains. Can we know what the Buddha believed based on what he taught?

If all teachings but the final teaching lack context and are limited in meaning, can they be used to gauge what the Buddha actually believed?
What is the final teaching, and does anyone fully understand it?

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:06 pm
Posts: 50
I get the feeling that most of the people replying on this thread are not soto zen practitioners, if they were I'm not sure they'd be such a defensive stance over literal re-birth.
I think I may stick to Zen forum international. This site doesn't seem to be helpful to my Zen practice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
dharmagoat wrote:
If all teachings but the final teaching lack context and are limited in meaning, can they be used to gauge what the Buddha actually believed?
What is the final teaching, and does anyone fully understand it?


If he spent all his teaching career of about fifty years teaching that rebirth is real and must be overcome, then we can safely assume he actually believed in it.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
Huseng wrote:
dharmagoat wrote:
If all teachings but the final teaching lack context and are limited in meaning, can they be used to gauge what the Buddha actually believed?
What is the final teaching, and does anyone fully understand it?

If he spent all his teaching career of about fifty years teaching that rebirth is real and must be overcome, then we can safely assume he actually believed in it.

But considered safe or not, it is still an assumption?

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
dharmagoat wrote:
Huseng wrote:
dharmagoat wrote:
If all teachings but the final teaching lack context and are limited in meaning, can they be used to gauge what the Buddha actually believed?
What is the final teaching, and does anyone fully understand it?

If he spent all his teaching career of about fifty years teaching that rebirth is real and must be overcome, then we can safely assume he actually believed in it.

But considered safe or not, it is still an assumption?


We know he taught rebirth throughout his whole teaching career.

Your arguments are misleading and unreasonable. Pointless.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
Huseng wrote:
Your arguments are misleading and unreasonable. Pointless.

I disagree. My questions are proving to be quite revealing. Please explain how they are misleading and unreasonable.

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:37 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Budapest
dharmagoat wrote:
So the original question remains. Can we know what the Buddha believed based on what he taught?

If all teachings but the final teaching lack context and are limited in meaning, can they be used to gauge what the Buddha actually believed?
What is the final teaching, and does anyone fully understand it?


The teaching is confirmed by proper reasoning and personal insight, the tradition of that is preserved by the community of the noble beings, the third jewel of Buddhism.

_________________
"There is no such thing as the real mind. Ridding yourself of delusion: that's the real mind."
(Sheng-yen: Getting the Buddha Mind, p 73)

"Neither cultivation nor seated meditation — this is the pure Chan of Tathagata."
(Mazu Daoyi, X1321p3b23; tr. Jinhua Jia)

“Don’t rashly seek the true Buddha;
True Buddha can’t be found.
Does marvelous nature and spirit
Need tempering or refinement?
Mind is this mind carefree;
This face, the face at birth."

(Nanyue Mingzan: Enjoying the Way, tr. Jeff Shore; T2076p461b24-26)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
Astus wrote:
dharmagoat wrote:
So the original question remains. Can we know what the Buddha believed based on what he taught?

If all teachings but the final teaching lack context and are limited in meaning, can they be used to gauge what the Buddha actually believed?
What is the final teaching, and does anyone fully understand it?

The teaching is confirmed by proper reasoning and personal insight, the tradition of that is preserved by the community of the noble beings, the third jewel of Buddhism

The community of noble beings preserve the understanding of the final teaching of the Buddha, and are therefore the ones that know what the Buddha actually believed?

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 1:23 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Budapest
dharmagoat wrote:
The community of noble beings preserve the understanding of the final teaching of the Buddha, and are therefore the ones that know what the Buddha actually believed?


The buddha-nature, the eye of awakening, is present in all, but only those who have actually opened it realise the way things truly are. And that is the correct faith of a buddha.

_________________
"There is no such thing as the real mind. Ridding yourself of delusion: that's the real mind."
(Sheng-yen: Getting the Buddha Mind, p 73)

"Neither cultivation nor seated meditation — this is the pure Chan of Tathagata."
(Mazu Daoyi, X1321p3b23; tr. Jinhua Jia)

“Don’t rashly seek the true Buddha;
True Buddha can’t be found.
Does marvelous nature and spirit
Need tempering or refinement?
Mind is this mind carefree;
This face, the face at birth."

(Nanyue Mingzan: Enjoying the Way, tr. Jeff Shore; T2076p461b24-26)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 1:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:06 pm
Posts: 50
Whether or not Buddha taught rebirth, I don't care. Whether or not Buddha believed in rebirth, I don't care, and if that means I have a "wrong view" I still don't care. I believe in my own experience, and I'm pretty sure Buddha taught this above anything else.
I share the sentiments of the Zen master who said 'I'm not a Dead Zen master' when asked about what happens after we die. I also share the sentiments of some Zen teachers who say that just because Buddha "Attained" enlightenment, that didn't mean he was some perfect, super human, infallible person like a lot of Buddhists seem to think. To even suggest that would put Buddha on a plateau of a God.

"If you see the Buddha, kill the Buddha"

"In the begginers mind there are many possibilities, in the experts mind there are few."

To me it seems we have far too many experts here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
Greg_the_poet wrote:
To even suggest that would put Buddha on a plateau of a God.


The Buddha was the teacher of gods and men. Hence, greater than a god.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
Huseng wrote:
The Buddha was the teacher of gods and men. Hence, greater than a god.

Can we question the existence of gods?

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
dharmagoat wrote:
Huseng wrote:
The Buddha was the teacher of gods and men. Hence, greater than a god.

Can we question the existence of gods?


I am certain you possess the ability to do so.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
Huseng wrote:
dharmagoat wrote:
Huseng wrote:
The Buddha was the teacher of gods and men. Hence, greater than a god.

Can we question the existence of gods?

I am certain you possess the ability to do so.

Your certainty may be unfounded, but I appreciate the endorsement. I will consider that another project for another time.

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:06 pm
Posts: 50
You seem to have an answer to everything don't you? Me and this site are finished. There's no room for independent thought here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
Greg_the_poet wrote:
You seem to have an answer to everything don't you? Me and this site are finished. There's no room for independent thought here.


Oh come on. I'm just having fun.

We disagree with each other and on a subject like this we're never going to get anywhere ultimately.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group