One point I thought was particularly relevant came early in the text, when the author comes on out and states that Zen is in fact a form of Buddhism and is intended as such--as a way to practice Buddhism. This is an interesting intervention to make, given that the previous generation of Zen teachers in the US gave a different presentation of the teachings; think of Nyogen Senzaki's claim (this is in Buddhism and Zen) that Zen is Zen, and Buddhism is Buddhism.
Beyond the teachings recorded in this one volume, when I look at his accomplishments in propagating the teachings in the US, I feel a kind of inspiration and gratitude. Inspiration that it's possible to get things done, and gratitude for what he was able to accomplish in establishing spaces for people to practice in an urban environment, and to get people earnestly and seriously settled into practice in significant ways. Even as his life was dramatically shortened by cancer.
I'm putting this up here because I think this teacher's teachings and life example are very much worth reflecting on. I'd also like to know more about the teaching activities of his Dharma heirs and the goings-on at the temples he established.


