Does this render the Buddhism redundant?

No holds barred discussion on the Buddhadharma. Argue about rebirth, karma, commentarial interpretations etc. Be nice to each other.

Re: Does this render the Buddhism redundant?

Postby edearl » Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:28 am

PadmaVonSamba wrote:
edearl wrote:Whether rebirth occurs or not, Buddhism is not redundant. Buddhist philosophy is IMO a way to minimize suffering in the world. Thus, Buddhism is needed as much or more than at any other time in history.


Re dun dant: from L. redundantem (nom. redundans), prp. of redundare "come back, contribute," lit. "overflow," from re- "again" (see re-) + undare "rise in waves," from unda "a wave" (see water).

Dictionary.com redundant: characterized by verbosity or unnecessary repetition in expressing ideas; prolix: a redundant style.
HHDL: "My confidence in venturing into science lies in my basic belief that as in science so in Buddhism, understanding the nature of reality is pursued by means of critical investigation: if scientific analysis were conclusively to demonstrate certain claims in Buddhism to be false, then we must accept the findings of science and abandon those claims."
User avatar
edearl
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:11 pm
Location: USA, Texas

Previous

Return to Open Dharma

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: duckfiasco, Indrajala, Inge, LolCat, M.G., supermaxv, udawa and 32 guests

>