The matter of faith

No holds barred discussion on the Buddhadharma. Argue about rebirth, karma, commentarial interpretations etc. Be nice to each other.

Re: The matter of faith

Postby Malcolm » Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:50 pm

KevinSolway wrote:I say that we only really have faith in that which we ourselves know.

The less we ourselves know, the less faith there is.



If we know that someone is an awakened person, than as the Eastern Gatehouse shows, we can have confidence in what they say.

N
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

" The one who teaches the benefits of peace,
he is said to be a ṛṣī; the others are the opposite of him."

-- Uttaratantra
Malcolm
 
Posts: 10152
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby KevinSolway » Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:56 pm

Namdrol wrote:If we know that someone is an awakened person, than as the Eastern Gatehouse shows, we can have confidence in what they say.


Yes, but you would only know that they were awakened if you yourself were awakened. So you would only trust them inasmuch as you can trust yourself.
KevinSolway
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:45 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby Karma Dondrup Tashi » Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:02 pm

Namdrol wrote:utterly lacking nuance ...


Hm ... is it irony to say that something lacks nuance "utterly"?

Hehehe

:stirthepot: :popcorn: :rolling:
User avatar
Karma Dondrup Tashi
 
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:13 pm

Re: The matter of faith

Postby Kunga Lhadzom » Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:59 pm

KevinSolway wrote:I say that we only really have faith in that which we ourselves know.

The less we ourselves know, the less faith there is.



If you KNOW (by experience), then faith is not required.
Faith is when you trust fully, someone/something outside of your experience (lack of experience)...because you have faith in them, that they are not liars, but truthful.

It is not possible to KNOW EVERYTHING 100% of the time.


http://www.shindharmanet.com/writings/faith.htm
Last edited by Kunga Lhadzom on Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Kunga Lhadzom
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:01 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby Will » Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:59 pm

This a good little survey re: faith - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_in_Buddhism
Revealing one essence: this means the inherently pure, complete, luminous essence, which is pure of its own nature. -- Fa-tsang
User avatar
Will
 
Posts: 1728
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby Malcolm » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:20 pm

KevinSolway wrote:
Namdrol wrote:If we know that someone is an awakened person, than as the Eastern Gatehouse shows, we can have confidence in what they say.


Yes, but you would only know that they were awakened if you yourself were awakened. So you would only trust them inasmuch as you can trust yourself.


No, this is false inference.

You can infere someone's awakening, or lack thereof, much in the same manner as a fire can be inferred from the presence of smoke.

N
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

" The one who teaches the benefits of peace,
he is said to be a ṛṣī; the others are the opposite of him."

-- Uttaratantra
Malcolm
 
Posts: 10152
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby catmoon » Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:02 pm

KevinSolway wrote:I say that we only really have faith in that which we ourselves know.

The less we ourselves know, the less faith there is.



I have faith that the teachings are reasonably accurate and there is rebirth. I don't claim it to be knowledge, but rather a belief I hold. Doesn't this contradict your first statement?
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.
User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: The matter of faith

Postby KevinSolway » Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:29 pm

catmoon wrote:
KevinSolway wrote:I say that we only really have faith in that which we ourselves know.

The less we ourselves know, the less faith there is.


I have faith that the teachings are reasonably accurate and there is rebirth. I don't claim it to be knowledge, but rather a belief I hold. Doesn't this contradict your first statement?


I reckon that your faith would be immeasurably greater if you actually knew it to be true. :smile:
KevinSolway
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:45 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby KevinSolway » Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:39 pm

Namdrol wrote:
KevinSolway wrote:
Namdrol wrote:If we know that someone is an awakened person, than as the Eastern Gatehouse shows, we can have confidence in what they say.


Yes, but you would only know that they were awakened if you yourself were awakened. So you would only trust them inasmuch as you can trust yourself.


No, this is false inference.

You can infere someone's awakening, or lack thereof, much in the same manner as a fire can be inferred from the presence of smoke.


Yes, strictly speaking you can infer, but you can't accurately infer very far from what you already know. The more you stretch the inference, the more likely you are to be mistaken. And there is always some degree of guesswork involved with inferences, which can lead to grief.

To take an extreme example, a person who has almost no idea what a fire is, or how to detect it, can make all sorts of mistaken inferences.
KevinSolway
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:45 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby catmoon » Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:49 pm

KevinSolway wrote:
catmoon wrote:
KevinSolway wrote:I say that we only really have faith in that which we ourselves know.

The less we ourselves know, the less faith there is.


I have faith that the teachings are reasonably accurate and there is rebirth. I don't claim it to be knowledge, but rather a belief I hold. Doesn't this contradict your first statement?


I reckon that your faith would be immeasurably greater if you actually knew it to be true. :smile:



That is surely true.

edit: or is it? If I knew it to be true, what need would there be for faith?
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.
User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: The matter of faith

Postby Dechen Norbu » Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:06 pm

If one has certainty, one doesn't need faith. If one has faith, one can't have certainty. They are mutually exclusive. You either have one or the other. Knowing something for sure is having certainty, so there's no faith involved. Faith is believing something to be true based on intuition, reasoning, inference and so on (or wishful thinking in the worst case), not direct knowledge. :smile:
User avatar
Dechen Norbu
 
Posts: 2798
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 6:50 pm

Re: The matter of faith

Postby KevinSolway » Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:06 pm

catmoon wrote:If I knew it to be true, what need would there be for faith?


"There is nothing more difficult to believe in than the truth" is an ancient Chinese saying, I just made up myself.

It is also said, "Truth is a flower in whose neighbourhood others must wither."
KevinSolway
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:45 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby Kunga Lhadzom » Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:11 pm

Sometimes the others wither from toxic fumes :)
User avatar
Kunga Lhadzom
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:01 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby Acchantika » Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:21 pm

KevinSolway wrote:
catmoon wrote:If I knew it to be true, what need would there be for faith?


"There is nothing more difficult to believe in than the truth" is an ancient Chinese saying, I just made up myself.

It is also said, "Truth is a flower in whose neighbourhood others must wither."


"Truth can never be told so as to be understood, and not be believed." ~ Blake
...
Acchantika
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:04 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby Kunga Lhadzom » Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:23 pm

But a Lotus can only grow from the mud.

(Experiencing suffering/hardships can be fruitful sometimes, in that you can learn the most from those hard experiences, and flourish from them. )
User avatar
Kunga Lhadzom
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:01 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby KeithBC » Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:44 pm

KevinSolway wrote:Yes, but you don't know who is wise until such time that you have wisdom - at which time you are wise yourself, and you can heed your own advice.
I disagree. Most people who pay even a little bit of attention to what is going on around them can tell a wise person when they meet one.

Om mani padme hum
Keith
User avatar
KeithBC
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:22 pm
Location: East Coast of Canada

Re: The matter of faith

Postby KeithBC » Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:47 pm

catmoon wrote:
KevinSolway wrote:I reckon that your faith would be immeasurably greater if you actually knew it to be true. :smile:


That is surely true.
edit: or is it? If I knew it to be true, what need would there be for faith?

It is true, but it devolves to a trivial case that is not worth discussing.

Om mani padme hum
Keith
User avatar
KeithBC
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:22 pm
Location: East Coast of Canada

Re: The matter of faith

Postby Will » Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:52 pm

KevinSolway wrote:
catmoon wrote:
KevinSolway wrote:I say that we only really have faith in that which we ourselves know.

The less we ourselves know, the less faith there is.


I have faith that the teachings are reasonably accurate and there is rebirth. I don't claim it to be knowledge, but rather a belief I hold. Doesn't this contradict your first statement?


I reckon that your faith would be immeasurably greater if you actually knew it to be true. :smile:


Her point is, I think, that knowledge supplants faith. If one knew "it" to be true, then faith is not relevant.
Revealing one essence: this means the inherently pure, complete, luminous essence, which is pure of its own nature. -- Fa-tsang
User avatar
Will
 
Posts: 1728
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby KevinSolway » Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:40 am

KeithBC wrote:
KevinSolway wrote:Yes, but you don't know who is wise until such time that you have wisdom - at which time you are wise yourself, and you can heed your own advice.
I disagree. Most people who pay even a little bit of attention to what is going on around them can tell a wise person when they meet one.


When you meet someone whom you believe to be wise, is it not because you recognize in them a truth which you have within yourself? Perhaps the person appears to have a clearer conception of that truth, or has triggered a clarification of your own truth. Nevertheless, the truth is your own.
KevinSolway
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:45 am

Re: The matter of faith

Postby KeithBC » Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:04 am

KevinSolway wrote:When you meet someone whom you believe to be wise, is it not because you recognize in them a truth which you have within yourself? Perhaps the person appears to have a clearer conception of that truth, or has triggered a clarification of your own truth. Nevertheless, the truth is your own.

The one you recognize may be your own. But having judged him as wise, it is useful to pay attention to what else he has to say.

Om mani padme hujm
Keith
User avatar
KeithBC
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:22 pm
Location: East Coast of Canada

Previous

Return to Open Dharma

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media, Norwegian, smcj and 9 guests

>