Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2014 2:49 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 772 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 39  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 206
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Namdrol wrote:
Beatzen wrote:
If you do not accept rebirth, this simply represents a defect in your present understanding of Buddhadharma.


I don't think of myself as defective. But feel free to do so yourself. I'm simply open about the fact that I haven't had an insight into it's reality while in meditation, which is the way to investigate it, is it not? From one buddhist practitioner to another, I wasn't expecting to be judged like that. I think it is better if we support eachother towards realization than characterize eachother as defective.

This has nothing to do with my question.

_________________
"Cause is not before and Effect is not after"
- Eihei Dogen Zenji


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:11 pm
Posts: 1999
Location: France
Beatzen wrote:
As I alluded to earlier, one cannot base faith in an idea on scripture. Scripture that was not penned but 3 to 500 years after Buddha's death.

I said, if I have a meditative insight into the reality of rebirth, I will gladly change my position. I will not argue this. Please don't stray from the topic, which was generally "how is Dzogchen/Mahamudra different from Zazen Samadhi"


So if you cannot base your faith on Buddhists scriptures, if you think re-incarnation is not a valid concept ... on what is based your behavior ? are you somehow related to Buddhism?

Sönam

_________________
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:11 pm
Posts: 1999
Location: France
Beatzen wrote:
Namdrol wrote:
Beatzen wrote:
If you do not accept rebirth, this simply represents a defect in your present understanding of Buddhadharma.


I'm simply open about the fact that I haven't had an insight into it's reality while in meditation, which is the way to investigate it, is it not?


That suppose you know how to meditate, or that your practice is valid ...

_________________
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Beatzen wrote:
Namdrol wrote:
Beatzen wrote:
If you do not accept rebirth, this simply represents a defect in your present understanding of Buddhadharma.


I don't think of myself as defective. But feel free to do so yourself. I'm simply open about the fact that I haven't had an insight into it's reality while in meditation, which is the way to investigate it, is it not? From one buddhist practitioner to another, I wasn't expecting to be judged like that. I think it is better if we support eachother towards realization than characterize eachother as defective.

This has nothing to do with my question.


I did not say you were defective, I said your understanding was. You are not your understanding, no? It can change, correct?

The state of non-arising and rebirth are not contradictory. In fact, the former makes the latter possible.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:58 am
Posts: 299
Doens't the story go that the Buddha recollected all his former lives when he progressed through the Jhana's?

Without out literal rebirth, Samsara isn't really Samsara, and Nirvana is not unconditioned and therefore not Nirvana. Only as I understand it though. Karma wouldn't really apply without rebirth either. But that is only my limited understanding.

Also it seems the ability to recollect former lifes and perceive future ones usually require a very high level of realisation. So to gain experiental knowledge of this, would require a damn lot of practice on your part I think :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:22 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
Posts: 2445
Location: Washington DC
AlexanderS wrote:
Doens't the story go that the Buddha recollected all his former lives when he progressed through the Jhana's?

Without out literal rebirth, Samsara isn't really Samsara, and Nirvana is not unconditioned and therefore not Nirvana. Only as I understand it though. Karma wouldn't really apply without rebirth either. But that is only my limited understanding.

Also it seems the ability to recollect former lifes and perceive future ones usually require a very high level of realisation. So to gain experiental knowledge of this, would require a damn lot of practice on your part I think :)


You are correct sir.

Without Samsara (cycle of death and rebirth), there is no Nirvana.
What is the point of practicing Buddhism then?

_________________
NAMO AMITABHA
NAM MO A DI DA PHAT (VIETNAMESE)
NAMO AMITUOFO (CHINESE)

Linjii
―Listen! Those of you who devote yourselves to the Dharma
must not be afraid of losing your bodies and your lives―


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Posts: 1953
Beatzen wrote:
As I alluded to earlier, one cannot base faith in an idea on scripture. Scripture that was not penned but 3 to 500 years after Buddha's death.

I said, if I have a meditative insight into the reality of rebirth, I will gladly change my position. I will not argue this. Please don't stray from the topic, which was generally "how is Dzogchen/Mahamudra different from Zazen Samadhi"


No wonder Zen is looked at askance... How bizarre that "one cannot base faith in an idea on scripture". So sutras & shastras that recorded Buddha's teachings are not a basis because they were written down a few hundred years after Buddha, yet your "meditative insight", (fully separated from faith in the written buddhadharma), will qualify, even though you live 2500+ years after Buddha. :zzz:

_________________
Only consider helping others and forget yourself. Master Hsuan Hua


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 206
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Let's see. Someone asked upon what do I base my behavior. I base my behavior on a desire to end my suffering. I could elaborate, but, what's the point?

I think the most enlightening response I've received here so far was the question of how consciousness arises to begin with, if there is no rebirth. That, to me, is worth questioning.

My understanding will change, and I may come to trust in the reality of rebirth for myself. I don't see how admitting that I don't understand it yet makes me a heretic.

But I don't think you can derive faith from scripture, straight up. You derive it from personally investigating the meaning of the teachings, not the teachings themselves. :P

_________________
"Cause is not before and Effect is not after"
- Eihei Dogen Zenji


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:58 pm
Posts: 1428
To clarify something about my earlier post, Beatzen, I should have realized that your personal non-belief in transmigration does not necessarily reflect the Zen teachings that you base your meditation on (although maybe it does in your sect?). Either way, the reality (or lack thereof) of transmigration is something that should be experienced, rather than believed in. Nevertheless, most traditions (Buddhist and 'non-Buddhist') are unanimous in their affirmation of the 'existence' of transmigration.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:36 am
Posts: 4027
Location: Spaceship Earth
Beatzen wrote:
I don't see how admitting that I don't understand it yet makes me a heretic.


Stop right there. You did not say you didn't understand it. You said:

Beatzen wrote:
But I don't think that reincarnation is literal. I don't think the buddha taught continuity of consciousness as we are referring to it as literal transmigration after death.


Not understanding (which common people can't) is very different from denying it. So you should amend your statement in denying literal rebirth in addition to stating you don't understand it.

_________________
    How foolish you are,
    grasping the letter of the text and ignoring its intention!
    - Vasubandhu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:47 am
Posts: 1434
Location: Globe
Beatzen wrote:
My understanding will change, and I may come to trust in the reality of rebirth for myself. I don't see how admitting that I don't understand it yet makes me a heretic.
Forgive me if I have missed a post or two that might contain the answer, but, do you believe that nothing happens at death? It's just "black"? or do you believe in some form of permanent afterlife (perm heaven or hells)?

Either way, there is no point in spiritual (Buddhist) practice if you believe either of those.

Kevin

_________________
ओं मणिपद्मे हूं

http://www.dalailama.com/webcasts/post/336-je-tsongkhapas-great-stages-of-the-path
http://www.ripple.org
http://caretoclick.com/save-the-rainforests/donate-clicks-likes-and-tweets-to-fight-climate-change-and-deforestation


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 206
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Lhug-Pa wrote:
To clarify something about my earlier post, Beatzen, I should have realized that your personal non-belief in transmigration does not necessarily reflect the Zen teachings that you base your meditation on (although maybe it does in your sect?). Either way, the reality (or lack thereof) of transmigration is something that should be experienced, rather than believed in. Nevertheless, most traditions (Buddhist and 'non-Buddhist') are unanimous in their affirmation of the 'existence' of transmigration.


Precisely. I don't speak for the sect that I take refuge with when I say I haven't experienced the reality of this phenomenon in meditation. I am not satisfied with just accepting affirming thoughts about the subject of transmigration. I want certainty. Reading all the sutras in the world won't do the meditative work to explore the possibility of such a realization. I have to say, I've got a lot of flak, particularly from the tibetan people on this board, for saying this.

_________________
"Cause is not before and Effect is not after"
- Eihei Dogen Zenji


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 206
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Mr. G wrote:
Beatzen wrote:
I don't see how admitting that I don't understand it yet makes me a heretic.


Stop right there. You did not say you didn't understand it. You said:

Beatzen wrote:
But I don't think that reincarnation is literal. I don't think the buddha taught continuity of consciousness as we are referring to it as literal transmigration after death.


Not understanding (which common people can't) is very different from denying it. So you should amend your statement in denying literal rebirth in addition to stating you don't understand it.


There's a difference between thinking and trusting in the reality of something. Don't be so hasty.

_________________
"Cause is not before and Effect is not after"
- Eihei Dogen Zenji


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 206
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Virgo wrote:
Beatzen wrote:
My understanding will change, and I may come to trust in the reality of rebirth for myself. I don't see how admitting that I don't understand it yet makes me a heretic.
Forgive me if I have missed a post or two that might contain the answer, but, do you believe that nothing happens at death? It's just "black"? or do you believe in some form of permanent afterlife (perm heaven or hells)?

Either way, there is no point in spiritual (Buddhist) practice if you believe either of those.

Kevin


I haven't made up my mind. I was hoping that I would gain a meditative insight. I won't share my thoughts on the subject, first of all because I take my thoughts with a grain of salt, and secondly because I don't want to get flamed for expressing "un-buddhist" views.

_________________
"Cause is not before and Effect is not after"
- Eihei Dogen Zenji


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Beatzen wrote:
Virgo wrote:
Beatzen wrote:
My understanding will change, and I may come to trust in the reality of rebirth for myself. I don't see how admitting that I don't understand it yet makes me a heretic.
Forgive me if I have missed a post or two that might contain the answer, but, do you believe that nothing happens at death? It's just "black"? or do you believe in some form of permanent afterlife (perm heaven or hells)?

Either way, there is no point in spiritual (Buddhist) practice if you believe either of those.

Kevin


I haven't made up my mind. I was hoping that I would gain a meditative insight. I won't share my thoughts on the subject, first of all because I take my thoughts with a grain of salt, and secondly because I don't want to get flamed for expressing "un-buddhist" views.



Listen -- you will have to forgive us. These endless discussions about rebirth are tiresome. We don't care. Either you accept it or you don't. If you don't fine. But there is no doubt that rebirth was the Buddha's teaching. People who cannot accept that, cannot accept must of the other teachings of the Buddha.

And please spare us the "buddhas teachings were not written down until..."First of all, this is false. Worst case scenario, Buddha's teachings were written down 150 years after his parinirvana (dates of Asokha pillars), which best scholarship places 407-400 BCE. But it is very likely that the earliest sutras were being written down within 50 years.

Mahayana sutras were almost certainly later compositions.

Tantras later than that.

But the one thing all these teachings share is a common thread of rebirth, karma, and dependent origination which are the cause of samsara, and the breaking of rebirth and karma through understanding dependent origination, which gauranteed freedom from rebirth in this or at most seven rebirths.

All those people who think they will attain awakening withotu understanding Buddha's actual teachings on this subject are deluded.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:47 am
Posts: 1434
Location: Globe
Beatzen wrote:
I haven't made up my mind. I was hoping that I would gain a meditative insight. I won't share my thoughts on the subject, first of all because I take my thoughts with a grain of salt, and secondly because I don't want to get flamed for expressing "un-buddhist" views.

How about karma. Do you believe in cause?

Kevin

_________________
ओं मणिपद्मे हूं

http://www.dalailama.com/webcasts/post/336-je-tsongkhapas-great-stages-of-the-path
http://www.ripple.org
http://caretoclick.com/save-the-rainforests/donate-clicks-likes-and-tweets-to-fight-climate-change-and-deforestation


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:58 pm
Posts: 1428
Beatzen wrote:
Precisely. I don't speak for the sect that I take refuge with when I say I haven't experienced the reality of this phenomenon in meditation. I am not satisfied with just accepting affirming thoughts about the subject of transmigration. I want certainty. Reading all the sutras in the world won't do the meditative work to explore the possibility of such a realization. I have to say, I've got a lot of flak, particularly from the tibetan people on this board, for saying this.


Well if anything, Vajrayana methods (particularly Dzog-rim (Completion Stage) and Dzogchen practices) would be more expedient to realizing the possible experience of the said truth regarding transmigration.

It is said that some Zen schools do teach some authentic Tantra methods; nonetheless, Zen/Chan is primarily Sutra. Not that there's anything wrong with that, it's just that Sutra methods by themselves are slower, and there doesn't seem to be much time left.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 206
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Virgo wrote:
Beatzen wrote:
I haven't made up my mind. I was hoping that I would gain a meditative insight. I won't share my thoughts on the subject, first of all because I take my thoughts with a grain of salt, and secondly because I don't want to get flamed for expressing "un-buddhist" views.

How about karma. Do you believe in cause?

Kevin


yes.

_________________
"Cause is not before and Effect is not after"
- Eihei Dogen Zenji


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 206
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Lhug-Pa wrote:
Beatzen wrote:
Precisely. I don't speak for the sect that I take refuge with when I say I haven't experienced the reality of this phenomenon in meditation. I am not satisfied with just accepting affirming thoughts about the subject of transmigration. I want certainty. Reading all the sutras in the world won't do the meditative work to explore the possibility of such a realization. I have to say, I've got a lot of flak, particularly from the tibetan people on this board, for saying this.


Well if anything, Vajrayana methods (particularly Dzog-rim (Completion Stage) and Dzogchen practices) would be more expedient to realizing the possible experience of the said truth regarding transmigration.

It is said that some Zen schools do teach some authentic Tantra methods; nonetheless, Zen/Chan is primarily Sutra. Not that there's anything wrong with that, it's just that Sutra methods by themselves are slower, and there doesn't seem to be much time left.


What do you mean there's not much time left?

_________________
"Cause is not before and Effect is not after"
- Eihei Dogen Zenji


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:47 am
Posts: 1434
Location: Globe
Beatzen wrote:
Kevin wrote:
How about karma. Do you believe in cause?

Kevin


yes.

So let me present you with a scenario. Two girls are born. One is impoverished, and one has a very good and happy life. The impoverished girl is unhappy because she has no resources. The rich girl has a great life in a good area, good education and so on. These are just two people. If things arise because of causes, why should one have to suffer and why should one have an advantage if causes put down in past lives were not having their effects in these girls lives now. Surely, the young girl who is poor, did not steal or rob from people, etc. as a baby and have to suffer for it now. So what is the reasoning behind the difference of events that happen in their lives?

Kevin

_________________
ओं मणिपद्मे हूं

http://www.dalailama.com/webcasts/post/336-je-tsongkhapas-great-stages-of-the-path
http://www.ripple.org
http://caretoclick.com/save-the-rainforests/donate-clicks-likes-and-tweets-to-fight-climate-change-and-deforestation


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 772 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 39  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group