Silent Bob wrote:This could save your lifehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j1-xQA_ufE
Silent Bob wrote:This could save your lifehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j1-xQA_ufE
Dechen Norbu wrote:David N. Snyder wrote:gregkavarnos wrote:
I would say that the best deterrent to rape, assault, etc... is increased social service facilities, a larger and more well trained police force (and by well trained I don't mean they can shoot straight but trained in ethics, psychology, sociology, conflict management, etc...) a reduction in poverty, a well functioning justice system, an education system that also deals with personal development of the students and not only on whether they can spell and add properly, developing a real sense of community, etc...
Yes, definitely. Even for those who do choose to own guns, it should be only as a last resort and not the first option. In all confrontations, escape and avoidance are best. LE agencies have been getting better at training the officers on conflict resolution, negotiation, etc. There have been several instances where I could have used the gun, but was able to use negotiation and other methods to avoid it. In over 30 years I never once shot at a human or animal, thank goodness.
In some training classes, even gun safety courses, it is taught how to do some conflict avoidance, including letting insults roll off you. For example, if someone insults you or gives you the finger in person or while driving, etc., you don't escalate by insulting them back, you don't flash your gun to them, since doing so would actually be threatening them even if they "started it" with the insults. Letting insults roll off you and being thick-skinned is actually pretty Dharmic and can help you progress and is a sign of maturity.
I am not a big fan of warning shots, except in some rare instances because you never know where the bullet will come down. A better option is a gun with a laser light attachment. Many criminals will piss their pants when they look down at their chest and see a laser light on their torso.
There are ammunition that while making a lot of noise are pretty harmless. In such a remote area, the pellets will scatter and their fall will hardly harm someone.
In the middle of a populated area, a warning shot may kill someone resting in his living room, so that's not a good option. A taser or mace usually are good options, since help usually comes quickly. This is why I've stressed Padme's circumstances so much. What applies to her needs may not apply to others. For her, mace or a taser would be out of the question. For a woman who have to walk home through a small park at night, these options are suitable.
In my own case I feel no need whatsoever to own a gun, a taser or a mace. But then I'm a man, 6.1 high, with years of martial arts training who lives at a peaceful area.
It's difficult for a woman in the middle of nowhere to negotiate with a couple of drunks with a boner. Better to shoot to the air while they are safely at distance, perhaps shouting "go away you rascals!" or something. I'm sure they'll wake up from their alcoholic torpor and turn around. It just doesn't worth the trouble. As the shot was to the air, they don't have their virility threatened either, so no macho bs is at stake . BTW, probably they wouldn't even see the laser pointer, even if it was on the tip of their nose!


Padme wrote:I would appreciate some opinions on this. The people on the country message board are all a bit bias, because they are country folk and guns are all they know. I thought I might get a more open minded opinion here. How do guns (for protection) come into play with Buddhism and doing no harm? Completely out of the question, or a good idea for protection? What do you think?
What am I doing hanging out with a bunch of thugs? Why do I have a gun with me? What am I, a cowboy or somethin'?Ryoto wrote:If you have a bunch of thugs ready to kick the sh*t out of you. Would you defend yourself using a gun with the possibility of committing a few fatalities or would you rather let them kick the sh*t out of you which can possibly lead to your own fatality?
gregkavarnos wrote:What am I doing hanging out with a bunch of thugs? Why do I have a gun with me? What am I, a cowboy or somethin'?Ryoto wrote:If you have a bunch of thugs ready to kick the sh*t out of you. Would you defend yourself using a gun with the possibility of committing a few fatalities or would you rather let them kick the sh*t out of you which can possibly lead to your own fatality?
Let's get untechnical and say that these reductive arguments about self defence which lead to an "either use the gun and kill them or die yourself" choice are ridiculous. I have been beaten by a group of thugs before in my life, it's no big deal.Ryoto wrote:Ok if you want to get technical. Let's say they broke into your house.

gregkavarnos wrote:What am I doing hanging out with a bunch of thugs? Why do I have a gun with me? What am I, a cowboy or somethin'?Ryoto wrote:If you have a bunch of thugs ready to kick the sh*t out of you. Would you defend yourself using a gun with the possibility of committing a few fatalities or would you rather let them kick the sh*t out of you which can possibly lead to your own fatality?
gregkavarnos wrote:Let's get untechnical and say that these reductive arguments about self defence which lead to an "either use the gun and kill them or die yourself" choice are ridiculous. I have been beaten by a group of thugs before in my life, it's no big deal.Ryoto wrote:Ok if you want to get technical. Let's say they broke into your house.
And your argument is plug them full of holes? Dude, you proposed the fantasy I rejected it. No need to get your knickers in a knot. Check your own mind before passing judgement on my mental state.Ryoto wrote:No you think its ridiculous because you have no argument. I wish the world was sunshine and rainbows as well but its not and its sad to see you still living in a fantasy world even after (apparently) getting beaten up by thugs.

wisdom wrote:C'mon you know this is how you spend your weekends, don't lie!
gregkavarnos wrote:And your argument is plug them full of wholes? Dude, you proposed the fantasy I rejected it. No need to get your knickers in a knot. Check your own mind before passing judgement on my mental state.Ryoto wrote:No you think its ridiculous because you have no argument. I wish the world was sunshine and rainbows as well but its not and its sad to see you still living in a fantasy world even after (apparently) getting beaten up by thugs.
Shooting the thug that dwells within!There were 52,447 deliberate and 23,237 accidental non-fatal gunshot injuries in the United States during 2000. The majority of gun-related deaths in the United States are suicides, with 17,352 (55.6%) of the total 31,224 firearm-related deaths in 2007 due to suicide, while 12,632 (40.5%) were homicide deaths.
Oooops wrong thug!A gun in the home is 22 times more likely to be used in an unintentional shooting, a criminal assault or homicide, or an attempted or completed suicide than to be used to injure or kill in self-defense.
Journal of Trauma, 1998
What? No thugs with guns?Based on survey data from the U.S. Department of Justice, roughly 5,340,000 violent crimes were committed in the United States during 2008. These include simple/aggravated assaults, robberies, sexual assaults, rapes, and murders. Of these, about 436,000 or 8% were committed by offenders visibly armed with a gun.
Okay, some thugs with guns.A 1997 survey of more than 18,000 prison inmates found that among those serving time for a violent crime, "30% of State offenders and 35% of Federal offenders carried a firearm when committing the crime."
My wife is a thug (shoot her!).Nearly one-third of all women murdered in the United States in recent years were murdered by a current or former intimate partner. In 2000, 1,247 women, more than three a day, were killed by their intimate partners. Of females killed with a firearm, almost two-thirds were killed by their intimate partners.
Oh, it looks like the thugs aren't gonna kill me after all, so what am I gonna do with this 0.45?In the five years to 2007, 292 people died as the result of an assault. This was more than the 284 people who died from that cause in the five-year period 1998–2002, but considerably fewer than the 356 people who died from an assault in 1988–1992 ... Five-year average annual assault death rates for the period 2003–2007 were highest among adults aged 25–44 years (2.1 deaths per 100,000), followed by youth aged 15–24 years (1.9 per 100,000) and those aged 45–64 years (1.2 per 100,000). Children under 15 years and older people aged 65 years and over had the lowest rate (each 0.8 deaths per 100,000).
So shooting the thug by mistake has a higher chance of causing death than getting shot at by a homicidal maniac???6.8% of mortalities worldwide are caused by unintentional injury, 2.84% by intentional injury (including war).

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests