conebeckham wrote:One of the real threats to Vajrayana is it's "crass commericalization." Another threat to Vajrayana would be the incorporation of sectarian politics, and practices which promote such views. It's important to understand the roots of one's own personal lineage and practices, to understand where they come from, and to have confidence that they are the unmistaken Dharma. Just as an example, it's probably best to rely on Wisdom Protectors who are directly related to one's personal practices, and whose antecedents can be found in the Tantras of those practices themselves.
Tsongkhapafan wrote:Yeshe wrote:Tsongkhapafan wrote:It's not exactly Freesangha here, is it?![]()
I trust that you have now read and understand my poor attempts at explaining exaclty how someone unprepared for Tantric Vows may be sucked into evem greater commitments which appear to be inviolable but are actually fabricated sectarianism. This sort of thing is a threat to the survival of Vajrayana. Hopefully here, through the ToS, we can help ensure that harmful practices are not disseminated.
Wow, it's the thought police here. I'm glad I'm free to choose my practices and what I can talk about.
The real threat to Vajrayana, and Buddhism in general, is using politics to change Buddhist traditions for the purposes of gaining control. Real sectarianism is banning spiritual practices for political reasons. In short, the biggest threat is politically motivated 'Buddhism'.
I can step back into the background now, have fun.
Hey, whoa there young man! Crass commercialisation!? You are forgeting the number one rule of this world we live in: You get what you pay for! What are yah, some kindda anarcho-commie-liberal-leftist-democrat!? Quick someone call the CIA, there's a free thinker running loose in the house.conebeckham wrote:One of the real threats to Vajrayana is it's "crass commericalization." Another threat to Vajrayana would be the incorporation of sectarian politics, and practices which promote such views. It's important to understand the roots of one's own personal lineage and practices, to understand where they come from, and to have confidence that they are the unmistaken Dharma. Just as an example, it's probably best to rely on Wisdom Protectors who are directly related to one's personal practices, and whose antecedents can be found in the Tantras of those practices themselves.

...why is it that the Jodo Shinshu, the religion in question,
has received far less attention and serious study than its rivals in the
religious scene?
She (his wife) immediately responded, Maybe it just wasn't different enough
from what they already knew. Maybe it wasn't exotic enough.
conebeckham wrote:.......I believe Sakyas are strictest in terms of limiting the number of students who can take empowerment at the same time,
Yeshe wrote:I regard certain organisations as being the greatest threat to Vajrayana in the West through the preaching of false dharmas and the cultivation of messianic cults rather than freedom of practice across all the traditions which share a common Buddhist motivation.
I am able to receive teachings and empowerments from any school, which IMHO enhances the understanding on which I may base my free thinking. Free thinking is not enhanced by the limiting of input to one guru's words.
Should a senior teacher in such a cult take empowerments from, say, the Nyingma, he would be sacked. Banning practices for political and commercial reasons is a fair description of an organisation which insists on the propitiation of a particular personal Dharmapala, which insists that disciples sign contracts to study (only the guru's) books, and which cultivates a persecution mentality. As with all cults, you know when the programming is successful as the victims feel they want to stay, to defend, that only this path is right - and that they must focus on it to the exclusion of non-cult friends and family. I hardly need to point to cases which indicate where this may lead.
I think I've written all I can within ToS about the reasons why such a cult may undermine the efforts of other Vajrayana schools in the West (on topic I hope), and why discussing them in detail here can end up giving oxygen to them. If I've danced around the fire and come a little too close to the flames, please forgive me.

mr. gordo wrote:I know it seems like a shallow statement, but it seems dead on. Tibetan Buddhism is alien enough to tap the interest of those brought up in a Judeo-Christian background to the ardent atheist. Also the Dalai Lama embraces the use of technology like Social Media to provide Buddhist teachings, and it seems like this could be further implemented by the Karmapa.
Yeshe wrote:I blame The Champions'! :
http://thechampionsfan.homestead.com/
To be fair, I should also blame Lobsang Rampa. LOL
I wonder if interest in whatever is 'occult' (hidden) is a constant interest or one which is cyclical in terms of the number of people engaged in the spiritual quest in the West.
Certainly the Theosophical Society and Olcott was part of one such revival, then we had the 1960's and we now have a whole raft of intrest in the ''occult', and Vajrayana may well be a part of that superficial interest due to its ritual nature and secrecy.
Maybe those periods are simply an indicator of each new generation, perhaps following public figures of their time such as the Beatles or Mad Donna.
Of course, just mention'Tantra' and some people may have a completely different image in their minds!
Anyone embarking on the Vajrayana due to a superficial attraction and attachment to a mistaken view will soon either change that view or leave, except in those dangerous organisations which prostitute the ritualistic and Vajrayana for their own ends.
Rael wrote:
lol...lobsang rampa...you just dated yourself....
i'm 55....i did the whole TM thing...back in the early 70's it was hard to find stuff in Montreal to" do"....lol...
J-Bird wrote:Thought I would encourage a discussion the progress of Vajrayana (Specifically Tibetan Vajrayana) in the west.
It seems like there could be a justifiable concern that the explosion of interest in Tibetan buddhism seen in the last 50 years is now on the decline. I have noticed that many practitioners, while staying with the path, have moved over to other traditions, or have adopted more secular manifestations of traditional Tibetan lineages.
What do you think?
Yeshe wrote:Rael wrote:
lol...lobsang rampa...you just dated yourself....
i'm 55....i did the whole TM thing...back in the early 70's it was hard to find stuff in Montreal to" do"....lol...
Guilty as charged (56). And another Genesis fan. LOL

Yeshe wrote:
I just hope Mad Donna doesn't turn Buddhist and buy a Tibetan child. Eek!
Rael wrote:Yeshe wrote:
hey Joni Mitchell did some cool stuff let me fetch....
here's one about Kundalinni...lol...it was the 70's>"God goes up the chimny like childhood santa claus
swampflower wrote:Rael wrote:Yeshe wrote:
hey Joni Mitchell did some cool stuff let me fetch....
here's one about Kundalinni...lol...it was the 70's>"God goes up the chimny like childhood santa claus
Hey I better check my Joni collection. What is the name of that song?
Don't you think it's true if it's not joined with (a) completion stage? Or do you think that creation stage without completion is not really creation?
conebeckham wrote:But there's also a way of practicing where the two stages are viewed separately, and completion is subsequent to creation......after all, if they are EXACTLY the same, why differentiate them?
So, perhaps it's good to be clear about what we mean by Creation and Completion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests