Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:29 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3669 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 ... 184  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:26 pm
Posts: 501
As far as health goes, a grain based diet and a meat based diet are equally problematic... grain based may be even less desirable than beef by a mile.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
And anyway is problematic if no one chooses to follow it...and the majority do choose not to..
The number of shoppers who go into the supermarket thinking about how many people could be fed by grain instead of beef is vanishingly small. And that is unlikely to change.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:27 pm
Posts: 196
Simon E. wrote:
The number of shoppers who go into the supermarket thinking about how many people could be fed by grain instead of beef is vanishingly small.


I have the impression that people are eating less meat than they used to, partly due to health concerns. I've noticed that the range of non-meat products in supermarkets is increasing, presumably driven by demand.
But it comes back to personal choice. Why add to the demand for meat and therefore to the suffering of animals when we have other options?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:27 pm
Posts: 196
Lindama wrote:
As far as health goes, a grain based diet and a meat based diet are equally problematic... .


Ever heard of mad-cow disease, bird-flu, salmonella, etc etc?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
porpoise wrote:
Simon E. wrote:
The number of shoppers who go into the supermarket thinking about how many people could be fed by grain instead of beef is vanishingly small.


I have the impression that people are eating less meat than they used to, partly due to health concerns. I've noticed that the range of non-meat products in supermarkets is increasing, presumably driven by demand.
But it comes back to personal choice. Why add to the demand for meat and therefore to the suffering of animals when we have other options?

You might draw that conclusion. I might agree in part. I cannot speak for other countries but here in the UK literally millions of turkeys, and tens of thousands of geese are about to be killed for Christmas lunch. The number sold each year is actually growing.
The number of UK citizens who will sit down to a vegetarian lunch on the 25 December is a tiny tiny minority, and is shrinking.
Vegetarianism peaked about 10 years ago in the UK, and is now retreating.
I may decide to eschew flesh, but it will make no difference to the vast majority.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:27 pm
Posts: 196
Simon E. wrote:
The number of UK citizens who will sit down to a vegetarian lunch on the 25 December is a tiny tiny minority, and is shrinking.


In that case I will free all the turkeys and distribute quorn fillets. :jumping:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am
Posts: 2845
The stomach-churning reason why meat is so cheap:
http://www.salon.com/2013/12/10/the_sto ... _so_cheap/
.
.
.

_________________
Profile Picture: "The Foaming Monk"
The Chinese characters are Fo (buddha) and Ming (bright). The image is of a student of Buddhism, who, imagining himself to be a monk, and not understanding the true meaning of the words takes the sound of the words literally. Likewise, People on web forums sometime seem to be foaming at the mouth.
Original painting by P.Volker /used by permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 4:41 am
Posts: 73
Location: N.E. Thailand
The impressions given on this link are non-representative of the average circumstance of farm animals. Worked on dary, owned and operated small farms, kept cows, pigs, chickens. No other way to say. This just militant vegetarian propaganda, as is the implied view that farmers don't love their animals.
650,000 copies of a book promoting beating children starting with willow branches at age 1 (!) and progressing to belts, were sold in the US. Shocking! So does this imply that this is how children are raised generally? I don't think so.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2295
Just noticed this:
http://www.amazon.com/Should-Evolution- ... 1118278720
and it looks like it should be worth reading.

_________________
ཨོཾ་ཏཱ་རེ་ཏུཏྟ་རེ་ཏུ་རེ་སྭཱཧཱ༔


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
Jigme Tsultrim wrote:
The impressions given on this link are non-representative of the average circumstance of farm animals. Worked on dary, owned and operated small farms, kept cows, pigs, chickens. No other way to say. This just militant vegetarian propaganda, as is the implied view that farmers don't love their animals.

Seriously, if farmers loved their animals, they wouldn't have them slaughtered. What kind of love would allow that?

If someone 'loved' you in that way, would you feel loved?

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:11 am
Posts: 614
Location: Oregon
In my line of work relating to TV broadcasting and news, when there are stories about the meat industry and animals, they're often referred to as though they were plants: "growing" chickens, "harvesting" cows. It sounds very strange.

_________________
Namu Amida Butsu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Posts: 732
Location: South Florida, USA
Jigme Tsultrim wrote:
The impressions given on this link are non-representative of the average circumstance of farm animals. Worked on dary, owned and operated small farms, kept cows, pigs, chickens. No other way to say. This just militant vegetarian propaganda, as is the implied view that farmers don't love their animals.
650,000 copies of a book promoting beating children starting with willow branches at age 1 (!) and progressing to belts, were sold in the US. Shocking! So does this imply that this is how children are raised generally? I don't think so.


It's not just a coincidence that horrible animal abuse has been found every single time the human society has done an undercover investigation. Animal abuse is the norm, not the exception. The idea that farmers are generally nice to animals is just meat industry propaganda.

_________________
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
The idea that there is a pan-Buddhist view of various issues, including diet and sexuality, is Sino-Buddhist propaganda.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Posts: 732
Location: South Florida, USA
The idea that it's ok for someone to chop a cows head off, is anti-buddhist propaganda.

_________________
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
Buddhists do not need to.
The world is littered with corpses of cows who have had their heads chopped off by the vast majority of the world's population who have no interest in Buddhism at all...that is not going to change , whatever you have for lunch.
Its pissing in the ocean.
By all means choose to eat whatever you feel right.
But don't kid yourself it will make any difference.
And don't think you are speaking for anything other than a particular Buddhist group.
Whose condemnation of meat eaters is only equalled by their condemnation of gay sex.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 4:41 am
Posts: 73
Location: N.E. Thailand
That a news agency which gets paid for higher ratings always finds a sensational story is somehow less than surprising. That you Don't hear about the times when they find nothing should be obvious. Believe what you want to believe. You militants don't seem to worry about the possibility of creating a schism when you condemn other Buddhists. That's so typical of ideologues. The concept of brotherhood and a middle way seems far from your thinking. Look into your heart at the anger and self righteousness there. Take care of that, then we can have a rational discussion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Posts: 732
Location: South Florida, USA
Jigme Tsultrim wrote:
That you Don't hear about the times when they find nothing should be obvious.


Unfortunately, that situation has yet to occur.

Simon E. wrote:
at all...that is not going to change.
Its pissing in the ocean.
By all means choose to eat whatever you feel right.
But don't kid yourself it will make any difference.


Same could be said of feeding homeless people.

_________________
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
Jigme Tsultrim wrote:
That a news agency which gets paid for higher ratings always finds a sensational story is somehow less than surprising. That you Don't hear about the times when they find nothing should be obvious. Believe what you want to believe. You militants don't seem to worry about the possibility of creating a schism when you condemn other Buddhists. That's so typical of ideologues. The concept of brotherhood and a middle way seems far from your thinking. Look into your heart at the anger and self righteousness there. Take care of that, then we can have a rational discussion.

You are of course correct at all points Jigme Tsultrim..But there will always be problems in holding true dialogue with what the late Bernard Levin called a ' S.I.F.'...a single issue fanatic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Posts: 732
Location: South Florida, USA
Simon E. wrote:
with what the late Bernard Levin called a ' S.I.F.'...a single issue fanatic.


Strawman + ad hominem.

_________________
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
seeker242 wrote:
Jigme Tsultrim wrote:
That you Don't hear about the times when they find nothing should be obvious.


Unfortunately, that situation has yet to occur.

Simon E. wrote:
at all...that is not going to change.
Its pissing in the ocean.
By all means choose to eat whatever you feel right.
But don't kid yourself it will make any difference.


Same could be said of feeding homeless people.

It could..and its true. There is no possibility that the world is going to run out of homeless people..or cuts of beef.
The difference is that no one is suggesting that Buddhism is predicated on the feeding or not feeding of homeless people.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3669 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 ... 184  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: LastLegend, Saoshun and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group