

You devil, you!futerko wrote:Samantabhadra and Samantabhadri in union (Yab Yum).
gregkavarnos wrote:You devil, you!futerko wrote:Samantabhadra and Samantabhadri in union (Yab Yum).
Konchog1 wrote:My Yidam since it's nature is the same as all other Buddhas.
All Buddhas have the same nature. So the Buddha you practice the most or like the most can stand in for the rest.Red Faced Buddha wrote:Konchog1 wrote:My Yidam since it's nature is the same as all other Buddhas.
What's your yidam?
Konchog1 wrote:All Buddhas have the same nature. So the Buddha you practice the most or like the most can stand in for the rest.Red Faced Buddha wrote:Konchog1 wrote:My Yidam since it's nature is the same as all other Buddhas.
What's your yidam?
I have no idea what you just said.conebeckham wrote:Ha Ha HA! Who's your yidam?
I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
![]()

Red Faced Buddha wrote:Konchog1 wrote:All Buddhas have the same nature. So the Buddha you practice the most or like the most can stand in for the rest.
I have no idea what you just said.
Sometimes people ask, "Are we 'one' or 'the same'?" Well, we are neither. Is there "one" space, or are different spaces "the same"? Space is neither "one" nor "the same," and so is the nature of mind. Trying to figure it out by labeling it "one" or "the same" is just another mental fixation. Likewise, there are neither one nor many Buddhas. You can't say there is only one, as there are limitless Buddhas, yet you can't say there are many, as their essence is a single ground--emptiness and compassion abiding like space. Thus, do not grasp at singularity or multiplicity.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests