Full strenght anatman. I have not the right feeling about the meaning of full strenght other than it is something about curd regarding wiki. Cannot be the case here I suppose. But it sounds powerful, bit extreme through my habits.
There is the example by the skandhas.
Then can you push something between a raindrop and wetness?
Me and others is clinging to I, an existence on its own, its biased dicrimination is others. Self and others are mind. Nondual nature; not two not one. Mind and its reflections, water and the moon reflection.
How can you be in two places at once if you are not anywhere? (could read something like this)
Compassion, is the problem? Goodness maybe? But goodness cannot be separate from emptiness and in that primordial goodness is no one who is good and who regulate the goodness. It is like the wetness and the raindrop- dependence-empiness
In Primordial Goodness/Primordial Wisdom (same) is no room for a concept which is dividing empty nature-compassion. Since it is all its selfless being. It is not like 'goodness' we know through apprehension/clinging.
This can help us: a negation of a nonexistence, a nonexistence of a thing on itself with characteristics. But when that thing is seen as a merely created concept, how can there be nothing when that isn't?
Trying to find out full strengt anatman-half strenght anatman. But without guidance and practice it remains concepts.
"Despite the fact that we are a ceaselessly transforming stream, interdependent with other beings and the whole world, we imagine that there exists in us an unchanging entity that characterizes us and that we must protect and please. A thorough analysis of this reveals that it is only a fictitious mental construct".
Shechen Rabjam Rinpoche.