First of all there is no such thing as punishment when we talk about karma. There is no bearded white dude in the sky that judges who goes to heaven and who goes to hell and then sends our soul to its respective abode to be punished or rewarded. An action based in anger brings about the causes for rebirth in hell. An action based in ignorance brings about the causes for rebirth as an animal... If you put your finger in a fire and it gets burnt is that because you are being punished? No, it is merely an outcome of your action. That's the way karma works.Red Faced Buddha wrote:I've always assumed karma didn't play much of a role in a person's life.However,others think otherwise.Take for instance Angulimala,the killer who was converted by Buddha.While he was with the other monks begging for food,some people attacked him with stones and he had to flee to live.This was supposed to be because of his karma.So karma manifested through the people.So would they have been punished for attacking the monk?But they were simply agents of Angulimala's bad karma.Does this mean people are robots,all their actions simply motivated by karma?

gregkavarnos wrote:First of all there is no such thing as punishment when we talk about karma. There is no bearded white dude in the sky that judges who goes to heaven and who goes to hell and then sends our soul to its respective abode to be punished or rewarded. An action based in anger brings about the causes for rebirth in hell. An action based in ignorance brings about the causes for rebirth as an animal... If you put your finger in a fire and it gets burnt is that because you are being punished? No, it is merely an outcome of your action. That's the way karma works.Red Faced Buddha wrote:I've always assumed karma didn't play much of a role in a person's life.However,others think otherwise.Take for instance Angulimala,the killer who was converted by Buddha.While he was with the other monks begging for food,some people attacked him with stones and he had to flee to live.This was supposed to be because of his karma.So karma manifested through the people.So would they have been punished for attacking the monk?But they were simply agents of Angulimala's bad karma.Does this mean people are robots,all their actions simply motivated by karma?
Secondly, the outcomes of the attackers actions (karma) may or may not manifest outcomes depending on three factors: the motivation for their action, the type of action and whether they expressed regret or satisfaction regarding the action. Now, and this is where it gets strange, the people that attacked Angulimala caused/assisted his past negative actions to ripen and acted as conditions for his becoming an Arhat. Does that make their actions good or bad?
Thirdly, no, people are not robots. Our current actions are definitely motivated by our past actions and our past karma sets up habits and tendencies that are acted out in the present BUT we have the ability to choose how and whether we act or not. That's the beauty of human existence. So the villagers that attcked Angulimala could have chosen to not attack him, instead of acting out their feelings of revenge or hatred. They were not forced to act the way they did, no more than you are forced to react angrily to being cursed at.
nirmal wrote:.How people treat us is their karma; how we react is ours.
catmoon wrote:Suppose you are walking along a nice country road and a butterfly lands on the road. But you don't see it, and you step on it without even noticing. Suddenly a giant hand appears in the air, grabs you by the collar and throws you into a flaming pit. This is Sin and Judgement.
Suppose again you are walking down a country road, but you have had a bad day. You are staring at the ground, muttering to yourself about your awful boss, bemoaning the horrible things he has done and plotting revenge. You are so wrapped up in these thoughts that you don't even notice the flaming pit in the middle of the road and so you walk right into it. This is Karma.
And suppose again you are walking down this road (maybe you are a commuter of sorts, you seem to spend a lot of time on it) and there is not much on your mind at all, so your mind reaches out to the day, and soaks it all in. You see a butterfly land on the road and stop to admire it for a minute before moving on. Rounding a corner you immediately notice there is a flaming pit in the middle of the road. Having accumulated a certain amount of experience with flaming pits by now, you give it a wide berth and continue unharmed. This is Enlightenment.

gregkavarnos wrote:Thirdly, no, people are not robots. Our current actions are definitely motivated by our past actions and our past karma sets up habits and tendencies that are acted out in the present BUT we have the ability to choose how and whether we act or not. That's the beauty of human existence. So the villagers that attcked Angulimala could have chosen to not attack him, instead of acting out their feelings of revenge or hatred. They were not forced to act the way they did, no more than you are forced to react angrily to being cursed at.


catmoon wrote:Rounding a corner you immediately notice there is a flaming pit in the middle of the road. Having accumulated a certain amount of experience with flaming pits by now, you give it a wide berth and continue unharmed. This is Enlightenment.
There is this little thing called relative truth, you know. It stops one from being roasted alive from stepping into flaming pits.zenkarma wrote:catmoon wrote:Rounding a corner you immediately notice there is a flaming pit in the middle of the road. Having accumulated a certain amount of experience with flaming pits by now, you give it a wide berth and continue unharmed. This is Enlightenment.
Are you certain of this? Maybe enlightenment is realizing that you and the flaming pit are fundamentally not different. In which case the problem never arises.

gregkavarnos wrote:zenkarma wrote:There is this little thing called relative truth, you know. It stops one from being roasted alive from stepping into flaming pits.
zenkarma wrote:gregkavarnos wrote:zenkarma wrote:There is this little thing called relative truth, you know. It stops one from being roasted alive from stepping into flaming pits.
Which one?

catmoon wrote:
Which one?
The one that seems to exist.
Tell you what, you jump into the flaming pit and I will apply the calamine lotion to your mistaken identity. Deal?zenkarma wrote:Exactly, which reduces the flaming pit predicament to a case of mere mistaken identity.

zenkarma wrote:catmoon wrote:
Which one?
The one that seems to exist.
Exactly, which reduces the flaming pit predicament to a case of mere mistaken identity.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests