Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:32 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:16 am
Posts: 185
Location: The Middle of Nowhere
I'll admit he's right on a few counts.There's no historical evidence that Dharmakara existed.However,that doesn't mean he's doesn't exist.Christianity is based on a myth as well..Anyway,I don't think it's important whether Amitabha existed or not,I think it's what he represents(hard-work,selflessness,etc.)is in truth divine enough.

_________________
A person once asked me why I would want to stop rebirth. "It sounds pretty cool. Being able to come back. Who wouldn't want to be reborn."
I replied. "Wanting to be reborn is like wanting to stay in a jail cell, when you have the chance to go free and experience the whole wide world. Does a convict, on being freed from his shabby, constricting, little cell, suddenly say "I really want to go back to jail and be put in a cell. It sounds pretty cool. Being able to come back. Who wouldn't want that?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 821
Red Faced Buddha wrote:
I'll admit he's right on a few counts.There's no historical evidence that Dharmakara existed.However,that doesn't mean he's doesn't exist.Christianity is based on a myth as well..Anyway,I don't think it's important whether Amitabha existed or not,I think it's what he represents(hard-work,selflessness,etc.)is in truth divine enough.

If it is a myth how can we explain all the cases of practitioners and sages throughout the centuries who have had real life experiences of Amitabha through meditation and when approaching death? It would be complete arrogance to claim that what they experienced were hallucinations. One can say the same thing about the experiences of disciples and saints of Christianity but that path is a different one which leads to different results.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:13 pm
Posts: 339
In Buddhist academic circles, Dr. Williams credibility is zero. Firstly, he developed his own extreme and intolerant version of the Tibetan 'rangtongpa' view, then when he found that he couldn't dominate others with it as he had hoped, he converted to Catholicism, which he found to be a more effective support for his own extremism.
:namaste: R.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:36 am
Posts: 4027
Location: Spaceship Earth
Raksha wrote:
In Buddhist academic circles, Dr. Williams credibility is zero.


This is completely untrue.

_________________
    How foolish you are,
    grasping the letter of the text and ignoring its intention!
    - Vasubandhu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:13 pm
Posts: 339
His book 'Mahayana Buddhism' is well respected, but on a personal level it is a different story. I can only write from my own experience as a former Buddhist academic in the UK; I've often heard former colleagues laughing and hooting at him (admittedly behind his back). This is due to his years of castigating others from an extreme and untenable Tibetan Buddhist viewpoint, then suddenly having a bizarre volte-face in favour of Catholicism. If you believe that such ridicule on the part of his peers is a sign of credibility then clearly we have a difference of opinion.
:namaste: R.


Last edited by Raksha on Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:36 am
Posts: 4027
Location: Spaceship Earth
Raksha wrote:
His book 'Mahayana Buddhism' is well respected, but as a scholar it is a different story. I can only write from my own experience as a former Buddhist academic in the UK; I've heard numerous former colleagues laughing and hooting at him on many occasions (admittedly behind his back). If you believe that such ridicule on the part of his peers is a sign of respect then clearly we have a difference of opinion.
:namaste: R.



His books are used by the majority of universities in their introductory Buddhism classes. Though there are issues of interpretation, the research is fine. I could care less about academics gossiping like little girls behind a man's back, instead show me a published paper lambasting the majority of his academic work.

_________________
    How foolish you are,
    grasping the letter of the text and ignoring its intention!
    - Vasubandhu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:13 pm
Posts: 339
Is it really possible to separate an individual from their work? Mary Wollstonecraft wrote an excellent early feminist work, 'A Vindication of the Rights of Women'(1792) but when it emerged after her death that her own life had fallen far short of the standards she exhorted in others, her credibility was destroyed. As for 'gossiping like little girls', I'm afraid that is the academy, it is no more than the collective opinions of one's peers. Lastly, I should point out that, in terms of veracity, the fact that the majority of people hold a particular view or opinion (or prefer a particular text) is irrelevant. Lots of people believe lots of nonsense.
:namaste: R.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:16 am
Posts: 185
Location: The Middle of Nowhere
Nighthawk wrote:
Red Faced Buddha wrote:
I'll admit he's right on a few counts.There's no historical evidence that Dharmakara existed.However,that doesn't mean he's doesn't exist.Christianity is based on a myth as well..Anyway,I don't think it's important whether Amitabha existed or not,I think it's what he represents(hard-work,selflessness,etc.)is in truth divine enough.

If it is a myth how can we explain all the cases of practitioners and sages throughout the centuries who have had real life experiences of Amitabha through meditation and when approaching death? It would be complete arrogance to claim that what they experienced were hallucinations. One can say the same thing about the experiences of disciples and saints of Christianity but that path is a different one which leads to different results.


Um,first of all,I did not say Amitabha was a myth.I was saying that even if he was a myth,and never historically existed,it wouldn't matter to me because of the traits Amitabha represents are enlightened.Secondly,what real life experiences.The only one I've heard of is that Thich Quang Duc,that monk who recited the Amitabha Sutra before he immolated himself :anjali: .

_________________
A person once asked me why I would want to stop rebirth. "It sounds pretty cool. Being able to come back. Who wouldn't want to be reborn."
I replied. "Wanting to be reborn is like wanting to stay in a jail cell, when you have the chance to go free and experience the whole wide world. Does a convict, on being freed from his shabby, constricting, little cell, suddenly say "I really want to go back to jail and be put in a cell. It sounds pretty cool. Being able to come back. Who wouldn't want that?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 821
Red Faced Buddha wrote:

Um,first of all,I did not say Amitabha was a myth.

I wasn't trying to imply that it's what you meant. I just wanted to make a point.
Quote:
Secondly,what real life experiences.The only one I've heard of is that Thich Quang Duc,that monk who recited the Amitabha Sutra before he immolated himself :anjali: .

Check out these links.
viewtopic.php?f=60&t=9035
http://www.freesangha.com/forums/genera ... d-stories/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 1:46 pm
Posts: 7
I haven't posted on this board in a while but I just wanted to submit that I have ethical qualms about quoting something that someone said to you in a private conversation "off the record" in such a public setting.

EDIT: Also wanted to say that Mr. G is correct: Paul Williams's work is very highly regarded throughout academic Buddhist studies. His book on the doctrinal foundations of Mahayana Buddhism is an absolute landmark achievement.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group