by jeeprs » Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:36 am
Really? That is very interesting.
Sometimes you hear the word 'awakening' used in the sense of 'becoming aware of a reality hitherto unknown', without this necessarily implying a state of final realization or 'beatitude'. You might read of a character's 'sexual awakening' which refers to their discovery of their sexuality...or 'political awakening' in the case of those who suddenly feel called to political action or organization. In this sense 'spiritual awakening' might only be a new awareness of a spiritual dimension to existence which had previously been unnoticed. So after this event, one remains aware of the spiritual depth of life, even if you don't necessarily spontaneously follow the behavioural patterns of 'an awakened being'.
As regards the verse quoted above, when the Buddha says 'I am awake', I think the term used in the Pali was the word 'Buddha' itself, which signifies 'knowing' in that profound sense. So here the sense of 'awakening' is associated with 'the awakening of the wisdom eye', or the ability to discern the causes and conditions of suffering.
Of course in the case of the Buddha, this is one who has 'awakened' to the point of being able to penetrate the very depths of the human condition and see something beyond it altogether. But one can still be 'awakened' to some degree, whilst falling short of that great depth of insight. Even to recognize 'the truth of suffering' represents a degree of awakening which is not possessed by everyone (similar to the point expressed above by Seeker242).
He that knows it, knows it not.