Permanence and Enlightenment

Post Reply
User avatar
AdmiralJim
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:11 pm
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

Permanence and Enlightenment

Post by AdmiralJim »

Upon becoming enlightened what stops ignorance from re-asserting itself?
If that is not possible then does that make enlightenment permanent?
How does that sit with the second turning of the wheel of dharma upon which the fundamental teaching that everything is voidness? :shock:
I don't know where we are going but it will be nice when we get there
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Permanence and Enlightenment

Post by Malcolm »

AdmiralJim wrote:Upon becoming enlightened what stops ignorance from re-asserting itself?
Having realized emptiness, it is impossible to forget that realization.


If that is not possible then does that make enlightenment permanent?
When a seed is scorched, it is permanently incapable of giving rise to a sprout, likewise, when the seed of ignorance is scorched, it can never give rise to the result, affliction, again
User avatar
AdmiralJim
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:11 pm
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

Re: Permanence and Enlightenment

Post by AdmiralJim »

Thank you for answering my questions although it doesn't address my last point of whether that contradicts voidness. :toilet:
I don't know where we are going but it will be nice when we get there
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Permanence and Enlightenment

Post by Malcolm »

AdmiralJim wrote:Thank you for answering my questions although it doesn't address my last point of whether that contradicts voidness. :toilet:

It does. Because of the realization of emptiness, the seeds of affliction are scorched.

N
xabir
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 4:14 pm

Re: Permanence and Enlightenment

Post by xabir »

Namdrol wrote: It does. Because of the realization of emptiness, the seeds of affliction are scorched.

N
Yet only a Buddha has completely removed afflictions right?
The very pulsing of dependent origination
Is the primordial face of the Tathāgata.
Like blood and veins and heart
- The two truths meet everywhere.

- André A. Pais
xabir
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 4:14 pm

Re: Permanence and Enlightenment

Post by xabir »

Namdrol wrote: Having realized emptiness, it is impossible to forget that realization.
But it is possible to forget one's realization in the next life, until one is 8th bhumi, is that right?
The very pulsing of dependent origination
Is the primordial face of the Tathāgata.
Like blood and veins and heart
- The two truths meet everywhere.

- André A. Pais
User avatar
Sönam
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:11 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Permanence and Enlightenment

Post by Sönam »

xabir wrote:
Namdrol wrote: Having realized emptiness, it is impossible to forget that realization.
But it is possible to forget one's realization in the next life, until one is 8th bhumi, is that right?
having answered to "who has realized" you have answered to your question ...

Sönam
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
User avatar
PadmaVonSamba
Posts: 9455
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am

Re: Permanence and Enlightenment

Post by PadmaVonSamba »

AdmiralJim wrote:Upon becoming enlightened what stops ignorance from re-asserting itself?
If that is not possible then does that make enlightenment permanent?
When you truly know or experience something, you don't stop knowing it or return to a time when that experience did not occur.
Ignorance is not the result, it is the cause (of suffering). It is a kind of not knowing. It's like a hole in the ground. Once you fill it up, it doesn't become a hole again.

AdmiralJim wrote:
How does that sit with the second turning of the wheel of dharma upon which the fundamental teaching that everything is voidness?
"everything is voidness" is not an accurate phrase. Accurately put, all apparent phenomena arise conditionally and have no intrinsic reality.

I don't see where enlightenment has any bearing on this.
If you are asking whether or not enlightenment is beyond conditionality, then let's define the term enlightenment, for the purpose of this discussion.

Let's say that Enlightenment, in the Buddhist context, refers to complete extinction of the causes of suffering and mental anguish. "Freedom from suffering and the causes of suffering".

You can throw in various powers and omnipotence and whatever you like, but I am trying to keep the definition uncluttered.

So, on the one hand, if we compare being enlightened to not being enlightened, then enlightenment is conditional. It only happens in relation to not being enlightened. That's why one person is seen as a Buddha and the next person isn't.

However, the next person also possesses the same potential for enlightenment as the Buddha. And although realizing that potential is conditional, because it depends on many factors such as motivation, right view, effort, and so on, The actual point of realization, of enlightenment, that is not conditional because by nature it's very essence, what makes enlightenment enlightenment, is its nonconditionality. Realization does not depend on shifting circumstances.

So, referring back to the first part of your question, about returning ignorance, Realization, or Enlightenment does not hinge on ignorance somehow creeping back in, because at this point the contradictions and dualities which appear to arise due to ignorance are totally resolved.
EMPTIFUL.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
Post Reply

Return to “Kagyu”