Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators

Nosta wrote:Phowa seems to be an interesting practice, specially if you can apply it to dying beings near you, but i dont understand why use it to yourself when recitation of "Namo Amituofo" is easy than visualizations, mantras, etc.
I am not saying that Phowa is wrost than Nembutsu, just trying to understand how things works.
Can someone here give me an insight on my question?
Thank you very much.
Yeshe wrote:
If there is a difference it is perhaps that the practitioner of Phowa is 'active' in the transference of their own (or another being's consciousness) rather than asking a Buddha to carry it out.
Nosta wrote:Phowa seems to be an interesting practice,
specially if you can apply it to dying beings near you,
but i dont understand why use it to yourself when recitation of "Namo Amituofo" is easy than visualizations, mantras, etc.
Yeshe wrote:Phowa is indeed a blissful and powerful practice.
It is also possible to perform it for other beings who are dying or who have recently died, helping transfer their consciousness to a Pure Land.
kirtu wrote:Actually Shakyamuni Buddha taught a form of phowa in the Pali suttas, specifically teaching people how to be reborn in the Brahma Realm (a god realm). Kirt

Nosta wrote:kirtu wrote:Actually Shakyamuni Buddha taught a form of phowa in the Pali suttas, specifically teaching people how to be reborn in the Brahma Realm (a god realm). Kirt
1) Whats the interest of teaching the rebirth in a God (and impermanent, and with suffering) Realm? Why would Buddha teach that if he knew that teaching rebirth on a pureland is much better?
2) Do you know any good links to sites or ebooks where one can learn more on Phowa?
kirtu wrote:Yeshe wrote:Phowa is indeed a blissful and powerful practice.
It is also possible to perform it for other beings who are dying or who have recently died, helping transfer their consciousness to a Pure Land.
And it's possible for us to win a Nobel Prize but it isn't that likely. It's not considered safe for untrained people to try to do phowa for others except for very light kind of phowa that Sogyal Rinpoche wrote about in his book "The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying".
Adamantine wrote:Yeshe wrote:
If there is a difference it is perhaps that the practitioner of Phowa is 'active' in the transference of their own (or another being's consciousness) rather than asking a Buddha to carry it out.
Actually supplication is a very important part of Phowa, in my understanding.. so in a way it is a meeting of being 'active' and asking both. .

Nosta wrote:Yeshe, for "lay" people like me and other members, without ay possibility to have a master that can teach Phowa and give empowerment, would you advise anyy good substitute for the practice of Phowa?
Maybe Nembutsu its the right for us?
By the way, what exactly means (and how it works) "to give empowerment"?
Thank you again for your patient and useful answers.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests