
Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators

gregkavarnos wrote:... projection ...
gregkavarnos wrote:There are (restricted) sadhana texts and commentaries available all over the internet too, if you believe that this means one should not get the prerequisite lung, tri and wang in order to practice them then...

Displays a complete and utter ignorance about the text we are discussing (which, when I received it, required about 40+ hours of explanation) and the Songs of Milarepa. Neither are general treatises (though some of the songs are), they are (codified) specific instructions on Mahamudra "practice". "Pointing out" instructions actually. Now if you reckon you can receive "pointing out" instructions without the presence of a teacher, well...That's right, and this doesn't appear to be one of them, but rather a general treatise about what the kagyu tradition is all about. Like the songs of milarepa, you know?
Once you release yourself from the view that you know what you are talking about (in regards to the specific text).So why are we arguing about it? Oh attachments to views, when will I release you?
randomseb wrote:gregkavarnos wrote:There are (restricted) sadhana texts and commentaries available all over the internet too, if you believe that this means one should not get the prerequisite lung, tri and wang in order to practice them then...
That's right, and this doesn't appear to be one of them, but rather a general treatise about what the kagyu tradition is all about. Like the songs of milarepa, you know?
So why are we arguing about it? Oh attachments to views, when will I release you?
Yudron wrote:gregkavarnos wrote:Sorry, just to clarify the confusion: the point I was (clumsily) trying to make is that just because a Google search turns up a teaching, does not mean that the teaching should be freely available. Just like the instance where a websearch for a (we all agree it seems) generally "nasty topic" does not legitimate the "nasty topic". I picked an (obviously) extreme example in the hope that may point was made clearer, it seems though that people reacted more to the example I chose than to the point I was trying to make (fair enough, given the nature of the example). I will try to use less extreme examples in the future!
I agree with Greg's main point here, which is that it sounds like this is traditionally a restricted practice, presumably introduced to students in the Kagyu system at an appropriate point in their training. There is no need for it to be circulating on the internet. As a practitioner in another lineage, I don't need to see it. Rather than cherry picking the highest teachings of every Tibetan lineage I need to bring my own practice to fruition.
conebeckham wrote: It is perhaps the most well-loved Karma Kagyu aspiration prayer there is.....
It is not a restricted text, at least not in the Karma Kagyu circles I have moved in for decades. BUT--it is ideal to have "lung," and more importantly, I feel, an oral explanation and commentary on the text.
gregkavarnos wrote:Neither are general treatises (though some of the songs are), they are (codified) specific instructions on Mahamudra "practice". "Pointing out" instructions actually.

randomseb wrote:The other point my Lama warned me about is that often these things don't translate properly, either because of a lack of a suitable word, or because of prior meanings to words (for example mind and consciousness). Often things are translated by scholars, not practioners, so the meaning gets lost
gregkavarnos wrote:Just making a point. Disturbing is the fact that there is even a single reference (to child pornography) out there on the internet.randomseb wrote:It is fairly disturbing that you would go thereYou won't see me disagreeing there.General reading of a text and practicing a text are two different thingsI am not upset, you are projecting.There's no call for getting upset
Foul references? Welcome to reality my friend! Upset about what? The 3rd Karmapas Aspiration Prayer?zangskar wrote:If you are using such foul references on a Buddhist forum and it's not even a result of your being (temporarily) upset, so much the worse.
Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:Good points. Some texts have two levels of meaning, e.g. Seven-Line Prayer to Padmasambhava.
practitioner wrote:Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:Good points. Some texts have two levels of meaning, e.g. Seven-Line Prayer to Padmasambhava.
Only two.....
Stewart wrote:practitioner wrote:Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:Good points. Some texts have two levels of meaning, e.g. Seven-Line Prayer to Padmasambhava.
Only two.....
Five according to 'Padma Karpo' by Ju Mipham. Check this:
http://www.quietmountain.org/links/teachings/7_Line_Prayer_To_Guru_Rinpoche/7lnpryr.htm
practitioner wrote:Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:Good points. Some texts have two levels of meaning, e.g. Seven-Line Prayer to Padmasambhava.
Only two.....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests