Is Dzogchen Compatible with the Madhyamika Prasangika POV ?

Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators

Re: Is Dzogchen Compatible with the Madhyamika Prasangika POV ?

Postby Malcolm » Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:40 pm

conebeckham wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
conebeckham wrote:I think it's more correct to say that the basis in gzhan stong (Shentong) is "Buddha Nature," which is not EXACTLY equivalent with emptiness, at least according to Dolpopa's presentation.


It is exactly emptiness precisely in the fashion that I described it, even in Dolbuwa's presentation.


I think there's a subtle point here. Shentong does say Buddha Nature is "Emptiness," but also discusses a basis beyond conceptual mind. This is from the POV of post-equipoise dialectics, though--I agree that the meditation is the same. "Prasangikas," that Tibetan invention, do not discuss a "basis" at all.

Yes?


No, they do discuss a basis. That basis is emptiness.

"Where emptiness is possible...", etc.
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

Though there are infinite liberating gateways of Dharma,
there are none not included in the dimension of the knowledge of the Great Perfection.

-- Buddha Samantabhadri
User avatar
Malcolm
 
Posts: 11743
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Is Dzogchen Compatible with the Madhyamika Prasangika POV ?

Postby conebeckham » Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:15 am

Okay, Malcolm.....but it's not "mere" emptiness, is it?
What, in your opinion, is the "difference" between so-called Rangtong and Shentong?

This is all in an effort to clarify for the original poster.....good to keep that in mind.
May any merit generated by on-line discussion
Be dedicated to the Ultimate Benefit of All Sentient Beings.
User avatar
conebeckham
 
Posts: 2658
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA

Previous

Return to Dzogchen

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

>