Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
deepbluehum wrote:A process has stages of causes leading to effects. The Buddha described this process as paticca-samuppada, the 12-links of dependent origination. Seeing that process in action actually caused the process to stop.
deepbluehum wrote:Tantras are not uncreated and eternal, maybe that's what Dzogchen says. But Vajrayana, if you get a correct explanation, never veers from cause and effect. Tantras arise do to conditions, period.
futerko wrote:Therefore it must be possible for the conditioned to produce the unconditioned as its result. (the Unconditioned is therefore also dependently arisen).
deepbluehum wrote:Tantras are not uncreated and eternal, maybe that's what Dzogchen says. But Vajrayana, if you get a correct explanation, never veers from cause and effect. Tantras arise do to conditions, period.
futerko wrote:maybe you could say that the tantra appears to arise from conditions, but what good would that do if the result was conditioned?
Jyoti wrote:the means cannot work without a principle that is changeless. Just like a wheel cannot spin without an axis that support it.
futerko wrote:Jyoti wrote:the means cannot work without a principle that is changeless. Just like a wheel cannot spin without an axis that support it.
Yes, I agree, but the changeless principle can only appear as a result initially. It is only realised as foundational afterwards.
Jyoti wrote:futerko wrote:Jyoti wrote:the means cannot work without a principle that is changeless. Just like a wheel cannot spin without an axis that support it.
Yes, I agree, but the changeless principle can only appear as a result initially. It is only realised as foundational afterwards.
As long as you keep any result or progresses on your own side only (the side of means), and never messed with the body, then the principle (meaning) will remain authentic.
Andrew108 wrote:Can you clarify this? It doesn't seem to make sense.
Andrew108 wrote:What do you mean by body? Means is what exactly?
Andrew108 wrote:What do you mean by body? Means is what exactly?
Andrew108 wrote:I thought so, but why call it body?
Jyoti wrote:Andrew108 wrote:What do you mean by body? Means is what exactly?
The body is what is permanent, uncreated, such as dharma, dharmakaya, dharmadhatu, nirvana and so on. The means is the functionalities of the body, it is make up of consciousnesses of the individual. There are 8 consciousnesses within the individual, only one is utilized as active means, the others as passive support, the body is actually the 8th consciousness (alaya-vijnana) which corresponds to the dharmakaya, it also acts as passive support. The active consciousness that utilized as means is the 6th consciousness, this consciousness support the thinking faculty and also discriminative wisdom, as long as this wisdom is activated, the 7th consciousness become support of the wisdom of equality. When these two is activated, the rest of the consciousnesses transformed into wisdom altogether.
Malcolm wrote:Jyoti wrote:Andrew108 wrote:What do you mean by body? Means is what exactly?
The body is what is permanent, uncreated, such as dharma, dharmakaya, dharmadhatu, nirvana and so on. The means is the functionalities of the body, it is make up of consciousnesses of the individual. There are 8 consciousnesses within the individual, only one is utilized as active means, the others as passive support, the body is actually the 8th consciousness (alaya-vijnana) which corresponds to the dharmakaya, it also acts as passive support. The active consciousness that utilized as means is the 6th consciousness, this consciousness support the thinking faculty and also discriminative wisdom, as long as this wisdom is activated, the 7th consciousness become support of the wisdom of equality. When these two is activated, the rest of the consciousnesses transformed into wisdom altogether.
This has nothing to do with dzogchen which explicitly rejects the idea that the ālaya = the dharmakāya.
Jyoti wrote:
Not the version of dzogchen that I know.
Malcolm wrote:Jyoti wrote:
Not the version of dzogchen that I know.
Then the version you know has a problem.
There is an extensive literature differentiating the ālaya from the dharmakāya based on the second chapter of the primary root tantra of Dzogchen, the sgra thal 'gyur.
Jyoti wrote:Not the version of dzogchen that I know.
Jyoti wrote:Malcolm wrote:Jyoti wrote:
Not the version of dzogchen that I know.
Then the version you know has a problem.
There is an extensive literature differentiating the ālaya from the dharmakāya based on the second chapter of the primary root tantra of Dzogchen, the sgra thal 'gyur.
Not objecting the need to differentiate alaya and dharmakaya either, but on the context above on transformation of consciousness into wisdom, it is regarding the body (basis), both alaya and dharmakaya are not from a different body.
Referring to the mahayana tripitaka:
頓悟入道要門論云:「問束四智成三身者,幾個智共成一身?幾個智獨成一身?答大圓鏡智獨成法身。平等性智獨成報身。妙觀察智與成所作智共成化身。」以上雖說四智三身,並無別佛,只是一佛所具!三身具足,四智圓滿之佛果,即是究竟位,此即唯識行者之大目的,大歸趣!
My rough translation:
<<The 'Commentary on the main point of sudden realization' said: "On the question regarding the four wisdoms becoming the trikaya, which wisdoms that combined to form the one body? The answer is the mirror-like wisdom alone become the dharmakaya. The equality wisdom become the sambogakaya. The combination of both discriminative wisdom and equality wisdom become the nirmanakaya". Although the above talked about the four wisdoms and trikaya, there are no other buddhas, but being possessed in a single buddha only! The perfection of the fruit of buddhahood that posessed the trikaya and four wisdoms is the seat of the ultimate, this is the grand objective and the meaning of the grand returning of the practitioner of the consciousness-only!>>
Here's the break down of the four wisdoms and their corresponding body and consciousness:
Mirror-like wisdom = dharmakaya = 8th consciousness (alaya-vijnana)
Equality wisdom = sambogakaya = 7th consciousness
Discriminative wisdom = 6th consciousness
Equality wisdom + discriminative wisdom = nirmanakaya
When one discusses on the stand-point of the body, the different terms are not considered different if they belong to same basis. But when one discussed conditions and method based on such conditions, those terms make a difference and should be differentiated in their respective condition.
Malcolm wrote:
Yogacara is not commensurate with Dzogchen.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests