ChNN's terminology

Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators

Re: ChNN's terminology

Postby dharmagoat » Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:51 pm

Blue Garuda wrote:I'd rather connect with a Bison than a Boson.

Or a Bosun.
May all beings be happy
dharmagoat
 
Posts: 1270
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Location: Gone Bush

Re: ChNN's terminology

Postby Blue Garuda » Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:55 pm

dharmagoat wrote:
Blue Garuda wrote:I'd rather connect with a Bison than a Boson.

Or a Bosun.


LOL :)
Left
Blue Garuda
 
Posts: 1967
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: ChNN's terminology

Postby Sally Gross » Fri Jul 06, 2012 7:33 am

dharmagoat wrote:
Blue Garuda wrote:I'd rather connect with a Bison than a Boson.

Or a Bosun.


Higgs-Bosons beat Bosuns (and for that matter, Bisons) any day -- they have infinite potentiality for massiveness and for holding things together (integrating), while bisons and bosuns have finite actual mass. Perhaps there is a useful symbol of the primordial state waiting to be discovered out there is the particle accelerators! :tongue:
Dukkham eva hi, na koci dukkhito,
kaarako na, kiriyaa va vijjati,
atthi nibbuti, na nibbuto pumaa,
maggam atthi, gamako na vijjati


Suffering there certainly is, but no sufferer,
no doer, though certainly the deed is found.
peace is achieved, but no-one's appeased,
the way is walked, but no walker's to be found.

- Visuddhimagga XVI, 90
User avatar
Sally Gross
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:33 pm
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

Previous

Return to Dzogchen

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 18 guests

>