Institutional Buddhism

User avatar
Dronma
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:29 pm

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Dronma »

conebeckham wrote: There are myriad other transmissions in Mahamudra lineages.....the funny thing is, they are all somewhat similar, but with the right one, at the right time, under the right circumstances, you may have "a different order of experience."

Which is not to take away from your own experience in the slightest, but merely to point out the possibilities.

Funny thing- that which is "pointed out" is beyond causes, conditions, etc., yet circumstances lead to this knowledge, this experience. Tilopa's sandal was not a part of "Institutional Buddhism," was it?

Yes, I agree. I also had completed Ngondro and other practices in Kagyu and Nyingma lineages, then I received Mahamudra. Well, my experience and understanding was mostly intellectual at that time.
Nevertheless, that does not mean that Mahamudra or the Lama who transmitted were not enough.
I am sure, that I was not "enough" at that time... :mrgreen:
The sound of s i l e n c e.....
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21938
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Grigoris »

Sherlock wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
gregkavarnos wrote: No, I was not aware of this. That's very interesting. I take it you mean the first Ju Mipham left the letter? Where can one find a reference for this? Thanks!
:namaste:
I think if you read any detailed bio of MIpham you can discover this fact. I forgot where I read this, but it was in an academic work.

Perhaps in Kapstein. In any event, as far as I am concerned there are no tulkus of Mipham who are in reality reincarnations of Mipham.

Wiki actually has a quote originally from Petit's book Mipham's Beacon of Certainty
The quotes give two accounts: one of Ju Mipham saying he will not reincarnate and one saying that he will reincarnate, but not in Tibet. Both accounts were oral directives given to his attendents. :shrug:
:namaste:
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Malcolm »

gregkavarnos wrote: The quotes give two accounts: one of Ju Mipham saying he will not reincarnate and one saying that he will reincarnate, but not in Tibet. Both accounts were oral directives given to his attendents. :shrug:
:namaste:
Three accounts, Greg: two to students, one publically. So two out of three.
User avatar
Sönam
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:11 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Sönam »

Simon E. wrote:I am vanquished.

:namaste:

As I have said on another thread I am not sufficiently au fait with the dynamic of debate on the forum to make a helpful contribution. Clearly there is the thing in itself and then there is something else. Which I suspect may be historical and perhaps personal.
I will therefore desist.

:namaste:
You do make a helpful contribution ... what is something else? Habituations and a bit of selfishness.

Sônam
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21938
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Grigoris »

Malcolm wrote:Three accounts, Greg: two to students, one publically. So two out of three.
Yes, you are right, three accounts:
According to one account shortly before he died, Mipham told his attendant:

Nowadays, if you speak the truth, there is nobody to listen; if you speak lies everyone thinks it is true. I have never said this before: I am not an ordinary person; I am a bodhisattva who has taken rebirth through aspiration. The suffering experienced in this body is just the residue of karma; but from now on I will never again have to experience karmic obscuration. … Now, in this final age, the barbarians beyond the frontier are close to undermining the teaching. [So] there is no point whatsoever in my taking rebirth here…I have no reason to take birth in impure realms ever again.

This may be interpreted as a statement that his mindstream would have no further 'emanations' (Wylie: sprul pa (tulpa); sprul sku (tulku)). Conversely, according to another account in which he mentions the mindstream in passing and prophesies the shortly before his death to his student Khenpo Kunphel:

Now I shall not remain long in this body. After my death, in a couple of years hence, war and darkness shall cover the earth, which will have its effect even on this isolated snow land of Tibet. In thirty years time, a mad (smyo) storm of hatred will grow like a fierce black thundercloud in the land of China, and in a further decade this evil shall spill over into Tibet itself, so that Lamas, scholars, disciples and yogis will come under terrible persecution. Due to the demon-king Pehar taking power in China, darkness and terror ('bog) will come to our sacred land, with the result that violent death shall spread like a plague through every village. Then the three lords of materialism (gsum-gyi-kla-klos) and their cousins will seize power in Tibet, spreading war, famine and oppression. No one will be safe. Now, very soon, my mind-stream will be gathered up in the pure-land of Tusita, from whence many emanations [of myself] shall then come forth in future years. I shall not take rebirth in Tibet. In twenty years, seek me in the northern lands of distant Uttarakuru, and elsewhere, east, west, north and south. Fear not, we shall be re-united again, as father and son. Now go!

In the above account, shortly after the departure of Khenpo Kunphel he stated publicly, "Now, soon I shall depart. I shall not be reborn again in Tibet, therefore do not search for me. I have reason to go to Shambhala in the north."
:namaste:
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Sherlock
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 3:14 pm

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Sherlock »

None of them really contradict each other IMO. It could mean the Khenpo Kunphel would be reborn in the same, non-Earth, realm that Mipham Rinpoche himself would go to.
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Malcolm »

Actually, look closely. Greg: all three accounts specify that Mipham will not be reborn in Tibet.He said to Khenpo Kunphel:

I shall not take rebirth in Tibet. In twenty years, seek me in the northern lands of distant Uttarakuru, and elsewhere, east, west, north and south. Fear not, we shall be re-united again, as father and son. Now go!
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21938
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Grigoris »

Malcolm wrote:Actually, look closely. Greg: all three accounts specify that Mipham will not be reborn in Tibet.He said to Khenpo Kunphel:

I shall not take rebirth in Tibet. In twenty years, seek me in the northern lands of distant Uttarakuru, and elsewhere, east, west, north and south. Fear not, we shall be re-united again, as father and son. Now go!
The first account says he will not take rebirth in "impure realms ever again". So it is quite clear that he will not be taking rebirth in Tibet or anywhere else on this earth (at least). In the second statement he states he will not take birth in Tibet but evrywhere else "east, west, north and south". In the third statement he seays he will "go to Shambhala in the North". So yes, in all three accounts Mipham will not be reborn in Tibet. That is very clear.

On the basis of this, one can then assume that the previous second and current third incarnation (who was recognised by Tengye Rinpoche of Lab in 1959, by Patrul Rinpoche and by Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche), since they were born in Tibet, are not valid based on the words of the 1st Ju Mipham. BUT Sakyong Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche, Jampal Trinley Dradul (born Osel Rangdrol Mukpo in 1962, son of Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche), since he was born in Bodhgaya India, can be recognised as the official second incarnation of Ju Mipham.

But all this merely underlines the inbred and political nature of Tibetan religious institutions. Political because the "official" Sakyong Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche apparently recognises the 17th Karmapa Orgyen Trinley Dorje, whereas the "rogue" 3rd Ju Mipham is the father of the 17th Karmapa Thaye Trinley Dorje. Yet another nail in the coffin for institutional Buddhism! ;)
:namaste:
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
User avatar
Mr. G
Posts: 4080
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Spaceship Earth

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Mr. G »

kalden yungdrung wrote:Some agree and some don' t. Its up to the person to make this decission.
Yes, and this is the answer to all discussions on this forum.
  • How foolish you are,
    grasping the letter of the text and ignoring its intention!
    - Vasubandhu
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Malcolm »

gregkavarnos wrote: ...BUT Sakyong Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche, Jampal Trinley Dradul (born Osel Rangdrol Mukpo in 1962, son of Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche), since he was born in Bodhgaya India, can be recognised as the official second incarnation of Ju Mipham.
No, because Bodhgaya is part of an impure realm.

What Mipham was saying in fact that as a Dzogchen practitioner he was going to take rebirth in the pure nirmanakāya buddhafields, but not here, on this planet or in this world system.
Greg
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:42 pm

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Greg »

gregkavarnos wrote:
Malcolm wrote:Actually, look closely. Greg: all three accounts specify that Mipham will not be reborn in Tibet.He said to Khenpo Kunphel:

I shall not take rebirth in Tibet. In twenty years, seek me in the northern lands of distant Uttarakuru, and elsewhere, east, west, north and south. Fear not, we shall be re-united again, as father and son. Now go!
The first account says he will not take rebirth in "impure realms ever again". So it is quite clear that he will not be taking rebirth in Tibet or anywhere else on this earth (at least). In the second statement he states he will not take birth in Tibet but evrywhere else "east, west, north and south". In the third statement he seays he will "go to Shambhala in the North". So yes, in all three accounts Mipham will not be reborn in Tibet. That is very clear.

On the basis of this, one can then assume that the previous second and current third incarnation (who was recognised by Tengye Rinpoche of Lab in 1959, by Patrul Rinpoche and by Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche), since they were born in Tibet, are not valid based on the words of the 1st Ju Mipham. BUT Sakyong Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche, Jampal Trinley Dradul (born Osel Rangdrol Mukpo in 1962, son of Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche), since he was born in Bodhgaya India, can be recognised as the official second incarnation of Ju Mipham.

But all this merely underlines the inbred and political nature of Tibetan religious institutions. Political because the "official" Sakyong Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche apparently recognises the 17th Karmapa Orgyen Trinley Dorje, whereas the "rogue" 3rd Ju Mipham is the father of the 17th Karmapa Thaye Trinley Dorje. Yet another nail in the coffin for institutional Buddhism! ;)
:namaste:
SMR may "officially" recognize K-OTD, but you won't see a picture of him anywhere in Shambhala, his name pointedly never comes up, and his 2010 visit to the US Shambhala did pretty much zero to support, a fact certain Karma Kagyu tulkus were extremely pissed off about. SMR has almost completely deKagyu-ized the community at this point. CTR's Shambhala terma, or a version thereof, is the only thing now on offer to new students, and outside Kagyu & Nyingma tulkus are no longer welcome for the most part.

Politics indeed. Whatever involvement I have with Tibetan Buddhism going forward will involve a minimum of hierarchical organizations, big thrones, and lamas who rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. I'm beyond tired of the dynamics of it.
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21938
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Grigoris »

Malcolm wrote:
gregkavarnos wrote: ...BUT Sakyong Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche, Jampal Trinley Dradul (born Osel Rangdrol Mukpo in 1962, son of Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche), since he was born in Bodhgaya India, can be recognised as the official second incarnation of Ju Mipham.
No, because Bodhgaya is part of an impure realm.

What Mipham was saying in fact that as a Dzogchen practitioner he was going to take rebirth in the pure nirmanakāya buddhafields, but not here, on this planet or in this world system.
Aha! So what you are saying is not that the three statements are contradictory but that they are complementary. Yes, I can see that. So you are saying that the statement: "...seek me in the northern lands of distant Uttarakuru, and elsewhere, east, west, north and south." is figurative and not literal?
:namaste:
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Simon E.
Posts: 7652
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Simon E. »

Greg wrote:
gregkavarnos wrote:
Malcolm wrote:Actually, look closely. Greg: all three accounts specify that Mipham will not be reborn in Tibet.He said to Khenpo Kunphel:

I shall not take rebirth in Tibet. In twenty years, seek me in the northern lands of distant Uttarakuru, and elsewhere, east, west, north and south. Fear not, we shall be re-united again, as father and son. Now go!
The first account says he will not take rebirth in "impure realms ever again". So it is quite clear that he will not be taking rebirth in Tibet or anywhere else on this earth (at least). In the second statement he states he will not take birth in Tibet but evrywhere else "east, west, north and south". In the third statement he seays he will "go to Shambhala in the North". So yes, in all three accounts Mipham will not be reborn in Tibet. That is very clear.

On the basis of this, one can then assume that the previous second and current third incarnation (who was recognised by Tengye Rinpoche of Lab in 1959, by Patrul Rinpoche and by Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche), since they were born in Tibet, are not valid based on the words of the 1st Ju Mipham. BUT Sakyong Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche, Jampal Trinley Dradul (born Osel Rangdrol Mukpo in 1962, son of Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche), since he was born in Bodhgaya India, can be recognised as the official second incarnation of Ju Mipham.

But all this merely underlines the inbred and political nature of Tibetan religious institutions. Political because the "official" Sakyong Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche apparently recognises the 17th Karmapa Orgyen Trinley Dorje, whereas the "rogue" 3rd Ju Mipham is the father of the 17th Karmapa Thaye Trinley Dorje. Yet another nail in the coffin for institutional Buddhism! ;)
:namaste:
SMR may "officially" recognize K-OTD, but you won't see a picture of him anywhere in Shambhala, his name pointedly never comes up, and his 2010 visit to the US Shambhala did pretty much zero to support, a fact certain Karma Kagyu tulkus were extremely pissed off about. SMR has almost completely deKagyu-ized the community at this point. CTR's Shambhala terma, or a version thereof, is the only thing now on offer to new students, and outside Kagyu & Nyingma tulkus are no longer welcome for the most part.

Politics indeed. Whatever involvement I have with Tibetan Buddhism going forward will involve a minimum of hierarchical organizations, big thrones, and lamas who rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. I'm beyond tired of the dynamics of it.
I grew weary of Kagyu politics and in particular the machinations of the Mukpo Marketing Board a long time ago.
Discovering ChNNN was extremely timely in my case.
“You don’t know it. You just know about it. That is not the same thing.”

Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 6997
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by kirtu »

Now, very soon, my mind-stream will be gathered up in the pure-land of Tusita, from whence many emanations [of myself] shall then come forth in future years. I shall not take rebirth in Tibet. In twenty years, seek me in the northern lands of distant Uttarakuru, and elsewhere, east, west, north and south. Fear not, we shall be re-united again, as father and son. Now go!
So at least this part of this prophecy says that Mipham will send emanations. This can also be read, with the earlier part of the prophecy, as saying that an emanation would arise 50 years after 1912 in the northern regions of Uttarakuru - a mythic place but in the 4 continent system possibly a reference to northern India or possibly just a reference to the north in general.

Anyway, according to this account, emanations will occur, just not in Tibet.

Kirt
“Where do atomic bombs come from?”
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Malcolm »

gregkavarnos wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
gregkavarnos wrote: ...BUT Sakyong Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche, Jampal Trinley Dradul (born Osel Rangdrol Mukpo in 1962, son of Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche), since he was born in Bodhgaya India, can be recognised as the official second incarnation of Ju Mipham.
No, because Bodhgaya is part of an impure realm.

What Mipham was saying in fact that as a Dzogchen practitioner he was going to take rebirth in the pure nirmanakāya buddhafields, but not here, on this planet or in this world system.
Aha! So what you are saying is not that the three statements are contradictory but that they are complementary. Yes, I can see that. So you are saying that the statement: "...seek me in the northern lands of distant Uttarakuru, and elsewhere, east, west, north and south." is figurative and not literal?
:namaste:

Uttarakuru, as Mipham surely conceived it, is not this planet.
Stewart
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 6:40 pm

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Stewart »

SMR may "officially" recognize K-OTD, but you won't see a picture of him anywhere in Shambhala, his name pointedly never comes up, and his 2010 visit to the US Shambhala did pretty much zero to support, a fact certain Karma Kagyu tulkus were extremely pissed off about. SMR has almost completely deKagyu-ized the community at this point. CTR's Shambhala terma, or a version thereof, is the only thing now on offer to new students, and outside Kagyu & Nyingma tulkus are no longer welcome for the most part.
??????! HHGK never went to the US in 2010

In 2008 SMR hosted a major part of HHGK's visit to the US....he went to the Shambhala centre in Boulder, Colorado, gave teachings and addressed Naropa students. Here's some of the photos, including SMR with HHGK and making a mandala offering to him: https://picasaweb.google.com/karmapa.fo ... erColorado" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

In 2011 HHGK was in the US to visit KTD and attend a Kalachakra initiation by HHDL, I think it was 8 days in total.

best wishes,
s.
User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 6997
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by kirtu »

Malcolm wrote: Uttarakuru, as Mipham surely conceived it, is not this planet.
So in your view, Mipham is telling Khenpo Kunpel that they will reunite in a celestial or pure realm? Or perhaps an impure realm just not on the planet? I thought that traditionally all four continents were on this planet surrounding Mt. Meru?

Kirt
“Where do atomic bombs come from?”
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
Greg
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:42 pm

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Greg »

Stewart wrote:
SMR may "officially" recognize K-OTD, but you won't see a picture of him anywhere in Shambhala, his name pointedly never comes up, and his 2010 visit to the US Shambhala did pretty much zero to support, a fact certain Karma Kagyu tulkus were extremely pissed off about. SMR has almost completely deKagyu-ized the community at this point. CTR's Shambhala terma, or a version thereof, is the only thing now on offer to new students, and outside Kagyu & Nyingma tulkus are no longer welcome for the most part.
??????! HHGK never went to the US in 2010

In 2008 SMR hosted a major part of HHGK's visit to the US....he went to the Shambhala centre in Boulder, Colorado, gave teachings and addressed Naropa students. Here's some of the photos, including SMR with HHGK and making a mandala offering to him: https://picasaweb.google.com/karmapa.fo ... erColorado" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

In 2011 HHGK was in the US to visit KTD and attend a Kalachakra initiation by HHDL, I think it was 8 days in total.

best wishes,
2011 is what I meant, my mistake. Yes, 2008 was four years ago, and I'm sure those kinds of courtesies will paid in the future too. The point is though, Shambhala is for all practical purposes no longer a Kagyu community, for better or for worse.
Stewart
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 6:40 pm

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by Stewart »

To be fair, 2011 wasn't a 'tour' HHGK only really attended the Kalachakra and brief visits to his centres.

Anyway, I'm not too much bothered about Shambhala, can't stand all that 'Lady Mukpo' etc crap.
s.
User avatar
practitioner
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 5:48 pm

Re: Institutional Buddhism

Post by practitioner »

Greg wrote:The point is though, Shambhala is for all practical purposes no longer a Kagyu community, for better or for worse.
The Shambhala group in my town has a large Kagyu refuge tree hanging in their shrine room. If a student wants to do ngondro (granted most don't) they do Kagyu ngondro. True there are no pictures of the 17th Karmapa but there are many of Trungpa and the 16th together. Their teacher is very upfront about the fact they are part of Karma Kagyu. Sure it is not traditional but to say they no longer Kagyu is surely overstating the reality.
One should do nothing other than benefit sentient beings either directly or indirectly - Shantideva
Post Reply

Return to “Dzogchen”