Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
This is a fake dichotomy!
White Lotus wrote:2. in this Dzogchen formum there is a rejection of the first approach, in favour of the second approach held by Namkhai Norbu's school and the lineage of Hui Neng, the 6th Patriarch of Zen (''See your nature and become a buddha!''). the second approach insists that one must see the true nature of mind or emptiness or energy. this second approach emphasises non duality. the second approach is also held by Therevada... to see dhamma nature.
so... we have these two approaches and should be aware that they cannot be reconciled.
the great question will always remain... is it already naturally complete? Or do we have to see it?
being or seeing. this is an argument between natural being and prajna seeing/wisdom.
What does "being" or "seeing" mean?
What does he mean when he talks about "natural being" or "prajna seeing"?
I'd like some clarification from White Lotus.
Sorry, this is all nonsense to me!
"My view is as vast as the sky, but my actions are finer than flour"
~ Padmasambhava ~
- Posts: 715
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:29 pm
- Location: Athens - GR
gad rgyangs wrote:you people are actually quite horrible. I try to ignore you as much as possible, but sometimes it genuinely astonishes me.
Takes one to know one.
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:54 pm
As it appears nothing new is being said (except perhaps for personal attacks) this topic is locked.
It's not a competition. It's a choice.
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4268
- Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:59 am
- Location: Who cares!
Return to Dzogchen
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: asunthatneversets, Concordiadiscordi, Gharchaina, LastLegend, monktastic and 16 guests