Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
dakini_boi wrote:?
dakini_boi wrote:?
booker wrote:dakini_boi wrote:?
I would go to Master to verify.


dakini_boi wrote:?
Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:Rigpa's just the natural state right here right now you don't need to do anything to recognize it or verify it.
If you try to ascertain whether or not you've got it or not that isn't it.
"Recognition" is just another empty thing.
Acchantika wrote:Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:Rigpa's just the natural state right here right now you don't need to do anything to recognize it or verify it.
If you try to ascertain whether or not you've got it or not that isn't it.
"Recognition" is just another empty thing.
Yet since a distinction is made between rigpa and "here-and-now" awareness, ascertaining the above must be vital.
Abiding in the awareness of the present moment, that is uncontrived and free of duality, is not rigpa, as I understand it. As Milarepa says:Don't conceive of yourself as having attained the sublime state
when your meditation is just based on nonconceptual calm abiding [shamtha].
Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:Acchantika wrote:Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:Rigpa's just the natural state right here right now you don't need to do anything to recognize it or verify it.
If you try to ascertain whether or not you've got it or not that isn't it.
"Recognition" is just another empty thing.
Yet since a distinction is made between rigpa and "here-and-now" awareness, ascertaining the above must be vital.
Abiding in the awareness of the present moment, that is uncontrived and free of duality, is not rigpa, as I understand it. As Milarepa says:Don't conceive of yourself as having attained the sublime state
when your meditation is just based on nonconceptual calm abiding [shamtha].
Good point but I didn't mean it was the practice of abiding in present moment I just meant it was in some sense always already here, therefore there is nothing to try to recognize. We can't try to abide in something we're always already abiding in.
deepbluehum wrote:I can't agree. The recognition is not always already there and must be recognized utilizing a method that must be taught.
Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:deepbluehum wrote:I can't agree. The recognition is not always already there and must be recognized utilizing a method that must be taught.
IMHO the path in dzogchen is not "try to recognize", that is a path of renunciation or path of transformation path - the path in dzogchen is remaining without doubt, having received direct introduction.
Acchantika wrote:Abiding in the awareness of the present moment, that is uncontrived and free of duality, is not rigpa, as I understand it. As Milarepa says:
Don't conceive of yourself as having attained the sublime state
when your meditation is just based on nonconceptual calm abiding [shamtha].
Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:deepbluehum wrote:I can't agree. The recognition is not always already there and must be recognized utilizing a method that must be taught.
IMHO the path in dzogchen is not "try to recognize", that is a path of renunciation or path of transformation path - the path in dzogchen is remaining without doubt, having received direct introduction.
Users browsing this forum: arsent, asunthatneversets, Google [Bot], kalden yungdrung and 15 guests