'Non-duality' and 'neutrality'

Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators

Re: 'Non-duality' and 'neutrality'

Postby Malcolm » Sun Aug 21, 2011 3:27 pm

muni wrote:There is nothing to undo, nothing to transform in the nonseparation of samsara or nirvana; all arises, subsides in itself. There is no samsara to undo or nirvana to reach.



Easy to say...
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

Though there are infinite liberating gateways of Dharma,
there are none not included in the dimension of the knowledge of the Great Perfection.

-- Buddha Samantabhadri
User avatar
Malcolm
 
Posts: 12246
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: 'Non-duality' and 'neutrality'

Postby muni » Sun Aug 21, 2011 3:40 pm

Namdrol wrote:
muni wrote:There is nothing to undo, nothing to transform in the nonseparation of samsara or nirvana; all arises, subsides in itself. There is no samsara to undo or nirvana to reach.



Easy to say...


Difference Dzogchen - Vajrayana. Easy saying words about.

Integration.
muni
 
Posts: 2945
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: 'Non-duality' and 'neutrality'

Postby Malcolm » Sun Aug 21, 2011 4:10 pm

muni wrote:
Integration.


Also easy to say, hard to do, as long as one is under the influence of afflictions.
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

Though there are infinite liberating gateways of Dharma,
there are none not included in the dimension of the knowledge of the Great Perfection.

-- Buddha Samantabhadri
User avatar
Malcolm
 
Posts: 12246
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: 'Non-duality' and 'neutrality'

Postby muni » Sun Aug 21, 2011 4:15 pm

Namdrol wrote:
muni wrote:
Integration.


Also easy to say, hard to do, as long as one is under the influence of afflictions.


It is very hard to do. As sem want to do something.
Going through hardship is often great teaching, as one get opportunity to see what the master's meaning, sees when mind painfully grasps to object.
Many disturbations, are one by one teachings. As mind in smoothly being feels no need enough "to listen to the master".
muni
 
Posts: 2945
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: 'Non-duality' and 'neutrality'

Postby muni » Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:24 pm

Namdrol wrote:[

as long as one is under the influence of afflictions.

Guru Rinpoche his advice/instruction to lady of Cho Kro (lady with poisonous emotions).
muni
 
Posts: 2945
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: 'Non-duality' and 'neutrality'

Postby White Lotus » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:35 pm

integration...
integrating awareness of the moment, which is emptiness.
integrating awareness of the self, which is emptiness.
integrating awareness of forms, which is emptiness.
integrating words and speach, all dharma (teaching), which is emptiness.
integrating rigpa, which is emptiness.
all these things are not one nor many and yet are one and many, emptiness. nothing besides.

when realised there is nothing to realise, youve always had it in this normal awarness of things within and things without. no within, no without, only emptiness.

easy to say, hard to arrive at. when arrived at... ive always had it!

best wishes, Tom.
in any matters of importance. dont rely on me. i may not know what i am talking about. take what i say as mere speculation. i am not ordained. nor do i have a formal training. i do believe though that if i am wrong on any point. there are those on this site who i hope will quickly point out my mistakes.
White Lotus
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: 'Non-duality' and 'neutrality'

Postby kalden yungdrung » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:01 pm

White Lotus wrote:integration...
integrating awareness of the moment, which is emptiness.
Please explain if possible
integrating awareness of the self, which is emptiness.
Please explain if possible
integrating awareness of forms, which is emptiness.
Please explain if possible
integrating words and speach, all dharma (teaching), which is emptiness.
Please explain if possible
integrating rigpa, which is emptiness.
Please explain if possible
all these things are not one nor many and yet are one and many, emptiness. nothing besides.
Please explain if possible

when realised there is nothing to realise, youve always had it in this normal awarness of things within and things without. no within, no without, only emptiness.
Please explain if possible

easy to say, hard to arrive at. when arrived at... ive always had it!
Please explain if possible

best wishes, Tom.



Best wishes for our practice

Mutog Marro
KY
THOUGH A MAN BE LEARNED
IF HE DOES NOT APPLY HIS KNOWLEDGE
HE RESEMBLES THE BLIND MAN
WHO WITH A LAMP IN THE HAND CANNOT SEE THE ROAD
User avatar
kalden yungdrung
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:40 pm

Previous

Return to Dzogchen

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Norwegian, RikudouSennin, Thomas_Pynchon and 19 guests

>