James Low & Simply Being

Post Reply
User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

James Low & Simply Being

Post by Astus »

He is one of the less known teachers as he tours only in Europe. I find his style very modern and appropriate for the audience. There are transcripts and videos on the website, there are also books you can buy.

Simply Being

Image"Simply being is the ground, path and fruition of all existence. The teaching of this is known as dzogchen or the natural perfection of all experience.
This is not an abstract idea but is the vital presence which we embody and engage with as the world around us. Dzogchen teaching recalls us to the open nature of all things, the natural state we have never left, yet have somehow forgotten."
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
muni
Posts: 5559
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by muni »

Astus, :thumbsup: that dwawing: "Much Ado About Nothing" = a negation of a nonexistence. Unfabricated nature.

That iron gate as symbol for Dzogchen of comparing, competition, entangled in dreamlike fabrication, grasping expressions, labeling, striving, partiality, hoping, fear, no confidence, assertive ideas/opinions..
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Malcolm »

Astus wrote:Dzogchen teaching recalls us to the open nature of all things, the natural state we have never left, yet have somehow forgotten."[/i]

This is a stilly statement. We never knew this natural state, had we known it, we would have never entered into samsara.

N
florin
Posts: 1340
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:05 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by florin »

then how can you" recognize" the natural state since you have never know it before..?
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Malcolm »

alpha wrote:then how can you" recognize" the natural state since you have never know it before..?

You receive an introduction.
Pema Rigdzin
Posts: 1292
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:19 am
Location: Southern Oregon

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Pema Rigdzin »

"... the natural state we have never left, but have somehow never known" would have been good, though.
Pema Rigdzin/Brian Pittman
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Malcolm »

Pema Rigdzin wrote:"... the natural state we have never left, but have somehow never known" would have been good, though.

Yes.
User avatar
Sherab
Posts: 1375
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:28 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Sherab »

Namdrol wrote:
Astus wrote:Dzogchen teaching recalls us to the open nature of all things, the natural state we have never left, yet have somehow forgotten."[/i]

This is a stilly statement. We never knew this natural state, had we known it, we would have never entered into samsara.

N
'Known' but not recognized and thus forgotten?
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Malcolm »

Sherab wrote:
Namdrol wrote:
Astus wrote:Dzogchen teaching recalls us to the open nature of all things, the natural state we have never left, yet have somehow forgotten."[/i]

This is a stilly statement. We never knew this natural state, had we known it, we would have never entered into samsara.

N
'Known' but not recognized and thus forgotten?

Recognition comes before knowing. I.e., if you don't recognize, you don't know.

N
User avatar
adinatha
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:07 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by adinatha »

Note the prefix: re-cognition. One can only recognize what has already been seen. Perhaps introduction, then knowledge, then practice would be the recognition.

Or, there is a background knowing--The Mother. And then teacher pointing is re-cognizing--The Son. Then ignorance would be knowing, but ignoring. But it can't be ignoring to the point of forgetting with impossibility of remembering, because the buddha-nature has no coming or going. It can't be lost.

Buddha-nature is not like memories. It doesn't accumulate or dissipate. Therefore, recognizing in the sense of re-knowing is right.
CAW!
User avatar
padma norbu
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 1:10 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by padma norbu »

I believe it is called "recognition" because once pointed out you can see that it was always there all along, but you never took notice of it. Too busy following thoughts rather than awareness of thought. It's "recognition" in the same way one can "recognize" the error of his ways, eventually, after thinking he was right all along.
"Use what seems like poison as medicine. We can use our personal suffering as the path to compassion for all beings." Pema Chodron
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Malcolm »

adinatha wrote:Note the prefix: re-cognition. One can only recognize what has already been seen. Perhaps introduction, then knowledge, then practice would be the recognition.

Or, there is a background knowing--The Mother. And then teacher pointing is re-cognizing--The Son. Then ignorance would be knowing, but ignoring. But it can't be ignoring to the point of forgetting with impossibility of remembering, because the buddha-nature has no coming or going. It can't be lost.

Buddha-nature is not like memories. It doesn't accumulate or dissipate. Therefore, recognizing in the sense of re-knowing is right.

Whatever, introduction, etc.

The point is aimed at the idea that we somehow forgot our real condition which we somehow knew before.

My point is that this is impossible.

N
Yontan
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:57 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Yontan »

This is just a semantic problem. Maybe an important one.
"Recognition" does imply a re-uniting with a previous understanding/perception, but the Tibetan phrases translated as such don't have any of the causal or even teleological overtones. Much more like "having the import bestowed upon you," i.e., "introduction."
The fact that what has been introduced is not newly arisen does not mean you've ever noticed it before. Using the same poor translation, to introduce would be to make someone recognize.
User avatar
heart
Posts: 6286
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by heart »

I agree with Namdrol, my Dzogchen texts says clearly that rigpa or the natural state was neither known nor not known from the beginning.

/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut

"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
florin
Posts: 1340
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:05 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by florin »

Dear people...i tried to discuss exactly the same problem you discuss here now but on a different thread ...but nobody seemed too interested....

Maybe it wasnt the right time...
florin
Posts: 1340
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:05 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by florin »

[/quote]Recognition comes before knowing. I.e., if you don't recognize, you don't know.

N[/quote]


Lets say the teacher introduces you ,you cant see it and then you go and practice and then you see it.
That to me is identification of something which was explained to you but not seen at that moment.Once you identify in your experience what the teacher said then the knowing comes.

once you know it then you can recognize it over and over again...
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Malcolm »

alpha wrote:
Recognition comes before knowing. I.e., if you don't recognize, you don't know.

N[/quote]


Lets say the teacher introduces you ,you cant see it and then you go and practice and then you see it.
That to me is identification of something which was explained to you but not seen at that moment.Once you identify in your experience what the teacher said then the knowing comes.

once you know it then you can recognize it over and over again...[/quote]


When you are introduced, then you recognize, then you know. Game over.
User avatar
Sönam
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:11 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Sönam »

recognition is not the process to re-discover what was already known. It is the process of having it, dealing with it, without knowing it is that ... then the pointing out of the master makes you recognize it for what it is.
Originally the pointing out instruction is on a one to one basis, making it strongly significant ... thus definitive freedom. On a large scale recognition has not the same impact.

Sönam
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Astus »

In other words, the primordial state of enlightenment is discovered. Mind-essence was pre-enlightened; our original ground is already enlightened. In the Dzogchen approach, this discovery is called being re-enlightened. Mahamudra does not use these terms re-enlightened and pre-enlightened, but at the fourth stage of nonmeditatation the meaning is basically the same. ... Third is awareness-rigpa reaching fullness, and the fourth stage is called the exhaustion or depletion of all concepts and dualistic phenomena. This stage is equivalent of the stage of nonmeditation in Mahamudra. The ultimate state of enlightenment is being re-enlightened in the pre-enlightened original ground, as mentioned above.
(Adeu Rinpoche: Correlating Mahamudra & Dzogchen in Quintessential Dzogchen, p. 210-211)

The best situation would be if we had never strayed into the deluded way of perceiving to begin with. But somehow it seems that we missed the opportunity to be primordially enlightened, and now we are deep in confusion. ... Even though we missed the chance to be primordially enlightened - "pre-enlightened," if you will - we can still attain stability in the natural freedom of our essence and become "re-enlightened."
(Drubwang Rinpoche: Fearless Simplicity, p. 95)

We possess an enlightened essence, but having temporarily lost that connection we are deluded. Continuously missing the opportunity to awaken, we fall under the power of our ordinary experience, governed by habits so strenuous to maintain such a clinging to a self. ... The loosening of our grasping untangles a knot in our heart; we do not need to stay bound and strangled by it. Likewise, from our confused state, we can be reprogrammed because we are primordially enlightened and we have the potential to return to that state as re-enlightened. Best to leave this for now and conclude by using Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche's words: ... The dirt has to be removed to re-establish the purity of the jewel.
(Marcia Dechen Wangmo: Confessions of a Gypsy Yogini, p. 15-16)
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Malcolm »

Astus wrote:In other words...


There is no term or concept in Dzogchen as being "re-enlightened". Does not exist and does not make sense.
Post Reply

Return to “Dzogchen”