Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
rai wrote:when one knows that there is time to go back to more gradual path? if few years passed and there is no real recognition, would it be wise to consider oneself as not having high capacity and try to find more gradual teacher? I remember someone was writing on e-sangha that some people stick with DC for too long without any progress. PS it is not so easy to check with the teacher as there are thousand of students.
Thank you!
rai wrote:when one knows that there is time to go back to more gradual path? if few years passed and there is no real recognition, would it be wise to consider oneself as not having high capacity and try to find more gradual teacher? I remember someone was writing on e-sangha that some people stick with DC for too long without any progress. PS it is not so easy to check with the teacher as there are thousand of students.
Thank you!

mr. gordo wrote:rai wrote:when one knows that there is time to go back to more gradual path? if few years passed and there is no real recognition, would it be wise to consider oneself as not having high capacity and try to find more gradual teacher? I remember someone was writing on e-sangha that some people stick with DC for too long without any progress. PS it is not so easy to check with the teacher as there are thousand of students.
Thank you!
I went from Vajrayana to Dzogchen back to Vajrayana. Don't come down on yourself because your "low capacity". Ask yourself if you enjoy your current practice and if you see a positive effect of your practice in daily life. I readily admit I am "low capacity"
rai wrote:when one knows that there is time to go back to more gradual path? if few years passed and there is no real recognition, would it be wise to consider oneself as not having high capacity and try to find more gradual teacher? I remember someone was writing on e-sangha that some people stick with DC for too long without any progress. PS it is not so easy to check with the teacher as there are thousand of students.
Thank you!
Namdrol wrote:rai wrote:when one knows that there is time to go back to more gradual path? if few years passed and there is no real recognition, would it be wise to consider oneself as not having high capacity and try to find more gradual teacher? I remember someone was writing on e-sangha that some people stick with DC for too long without any progress. PS it is not so easy to check with the teacher as there are thousand of students.
Thank you!
Capacity depends on personal interest and diligence -- nothing more.
N
mr. gordo wrote:Namdrol wrote:rai wrote:when one knows that there is time to go back to more gradual path? if few years passed and there is no real recognition, would it be wise to consider oneself as not having high capacity and try to find more gradual teacher? I remember someone was writing on e-sangha that some people stick with DC for too long without any progress. PS it is not so easy to check with the teacher as there are thousand of students.
Thank you!
Capacity depends on personal interest and diligence -- nothing more.
N
Oh, I thought it was based on the intelligence of the practitioner to grasp the teachings. Thanks for the clarification.
adinatha wrote:If there's no one to one relationship, it's not a relationship. For DC you need a relationship.

Yontan wrote:My dzogchen teachers have never taught it as anything outside of the lamrim.
Well, better put: the lamrim is contextualized by dzogchen
kalden yungdrung wrote:Without blessings
No realisation
mr. gordo wrote:kalden yungdrung wrote:Without blessings
No realisation
Yes, of course one needs transmission
mr. gordo wrote:Yontan wrote:My dzogchen teachers have never taught it as anything outside of the lamrim.
Well, better put: the lamrim is contextualized by dzogchen
I think the same could be said about the Abhidharmakosa if it's about knowing one's real state.
Yontan wrote:mr. gordo wrote:Yontan wrote:My dzogchen teachers have never taught it as anything outside of the lamrim.
Well, better put: the lamrim is contextualized by dzogchen
I think the same could be said about the Abhidharmakosa if it's about knowing one's real state.
Absolutely. If you have to leave Buddhism to practice dzogchen, you aren't practicing dzogchen.
kalden yungdrung wrote:
What does Buddhism incorporate inside the Dzogchen?
- Is Dzogchen based on teachings stemming from Buddha Shakyamuni?
- In case of yes how is this Dzogchen lineage called and which Dzogchen Masters are included?
- Can one practioce Dzogchen without being a Buddhist?
- What is a Buddhist or when can one call oneself a Buddhist?
Namdrol wrote:kalden yungdrung wrote:
What does Buddhism incorporate inside the Dzogchen?
Not a clear question.
My question was better said, which Buddhist elements are inside Dzogchen philiosophy or which are in a certain way common. One suggestion would be Sugatagarbha?- Is Dzogchen based on teachings stemming from Buddha Shakyamuni?
Garab Dorje is an emanation of Shakyamuni Buddha.
This is new to me. Is this somewhere in a Dzogchen teaching from Prahevajra mentioned, or somewhere else in Garab Dorjes commentaries?-
In case of yes how is this Dzogchen lineage called and which Dzogchen Masters are included?
Samantabhadra, Vajrasattva, etc., Garab Dorje, Manjshruimitra, etc.
Yes i know that Kuntu Zangpo is here the primordial source and that would not be Buddha Shakyamuni[./color]- Can one practioce Dzogchen without being a Buddhist?
No. Whoever follows the teachings of a Buddha is a Buddhist.
[color=#0080FF]Can fully agrre to this because Dzogchen is not known in the non - Buddhist cultures/religions/ philosophies- What is a Buddhist or when can one call oneself a Buddhist?
When one goes for refuge to any Buddha, his Dharma and his Sangha.
Users browsing this forum: Fa Dao and 7 guests