Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
Sherlock wrote:On the Nyingma kama thread, Yudron mentioned that the claims that there were masters who practised Dzogchen without any deity are false. This is definitely true for probably all the masters we know anything about, i have heard however that Kumaradza apparently did practise "pure" Dzogchen without deity yoga and that was a reason Longchenpa went to him instead of the Third Karmapa to learn.
Anyway I am just mentioning what I heard I don't mean any conflict.
Sherlock wrote:On the Nyingma kama thread, Yudron mentioned that the claims that there were masters who practised Dzogchen without any deity are false. This is definitely true for probably all the masters we know anything about, i have heard however that Kumaradza apparently did practise "pure" Dzogchen without deity yoga and that was a reason Longchenpa went to him instead of the Third Karmapa to learn.
Anyway I am just mentioning what I heard I don't mean any conflict.
Sherlock wrote:
Anyway I am just mentioning what I heard I don't mean any conflict.

At that time, the definitive points of the Nyingtik teachings had been diluted by the intellectual faults of various teachers. Kumaradza clearly distinguished himself from those who behaved erroneously by blurring the distinction between these points and the view and meditation of the Mahamudra approach, the Zhije school, the Six Techniques of Union of the Kalachakra cycle, and so forth.
Wouldn't it be wonderful to have translations of these texts?
Yudron wrote:My impression is, take it or leave it, that a lot of these great lineage holder enlightened beings practice Vajrasattva until the end of their lives. Dilgo Khyentse's namthar mentions his ongoing practice on Mindroling Vajrasattva, and I know other great lamas who continued VS practice to the end, although for some it might be one mala of the short mantra or 21 100 syllable mantras.
Vajrasattva has been with the Dzogchen lineages from the beginning.
Yeti wrote:IMHO He didn't do these practices out of personal need or requirement, but to pass on the maximum blessings to others and to fulfil his activity.
heart wrote:Yeti wrote:IMHO He didn't do these practices out of personal need or requirement, but to pass on the maximum blessings to others and to fulfil his activity.
I think that depends on what you mean with "personal need". For example ChNNR says he would not be alive today if he didn't do Mandarava practice. His death would be very bad for his students. So what was beneficial for Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche certainly benefited infinite other sentient beings as well.
/magnus
Yeti wrote:heart wrote:Yeti wrote:IMHO He didn't do these practices out of personal need or requirement, but to pass on the maximum blessings to others and to fulfil his activity.
I think that depends on what you mean with "personal need". For example ChNNR says he would not be alive today if he didn't do Mandarava practice. His death would be very bad for his students. So what was beneficial for Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche certainly benefited infinite other sentient beings as well.
/magnus
I don't dispute that at all.
But, for instance, Guru Rinpoche did heaps of retreats and practices. He didn't need too. He didn't hang out in villages, but regardless of his attainment, he kept on practising in retreat. I don't think he needed to do those practices at all, but they were done to conscecrate them further, for our benefit IMHO (could be wrong). AFAIK it was all done to bless the practices that where transmitted. I'd put the 60 odd years Kyabje Trulshik Rinpoche spent in retreat, of which 35 years was spent on the Nyingthik Yabshi into that category too.
heart wrote:My only point was that at their level of attainment the line between "personal need" and "for the benefit of all sentient beings" becomes a little hazy. If we are serious about this path it goes on until we die, no vacations.![]()
/magnus
Users browsing this forum: Norwegian and 11 guests