I am not talking starvation, the African governments support the use of genetically modified foods/grains as they are considered to offer better harvests. I myself thought years ago they did not but was rudely awakened to that fact.
Culture of death??
Why would corporations which benefit greatly by continually booming populations and the profits they garnish by such increases want a culture of death...it makes absolutely no sense.
Heruka wrote:KeithBC wrote: I would like to see sterility be a compulsory feature of all GM products.
Om mani padme hum
there are many studies about the accumulative effects of these GMO foods, on organ failure and infertility and sterile increases in mammals sperm counts and so on, ....
those calling for it [emphasis added - KeithBC] are not immune from it, unless your are elite who has traditional farming and husbandry food resources, ie like prince charles.
Heruka wrote:KeithBC wrote:
I understand the objection - that it forces farmers to be dependent on the big M - and I do not support it if it is the sole "benefit" of the GM seeds. However, GM organisms that have other engineered attributes, like inherent insecticides, for example, should not be able to reproduce into the general environment.
Om mani padme hum
Aug 2 (Reuters) - Pancreatic tumor cells ...
Heruka wrote:unless I'm reading you wrong and you feel a program of infertility in humans is a good thing?
However a culture of death as in manfacturing population control issues killing to intensify such actions.....that's pipe dream stuff. That's blending the real with the unreal, and forming a resultant unreal result. The death is incidental to the societal disruption. Certainly war involves killing but again the goal is not the death or the killing it is to produce societal disruption to allow for change to corporate benefit.
ronnewmexico wrote:However a culture of death as in manfacturing population control issues killing to intensify such actions.....that's pipe dream stuff. That's blending the real with the unreal, and forming a resultant unreal result.
It is like the neocons, though this is totally a different subject, but it reminded me a bit of this... thinking all humans are suitable for democratic institutions, just by virtue of being human.
This is why liberals and conservatives are exactly equal....they hold that view on human nature neocons and bleeding hearts.....as being pure and generous by nature. Humans are not.....they suck. Democracy and anarchy are simply not applicable for most ignorant humans. Educated....only them both may be reasonable.
Users browsing this forum: WoodsyLadyM, Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests