Recent discovery of “earliest Buddhist shrine” a sham?

A place for discussion of current events. Buddhist news would be particularly appreciated.
Posts: 2776
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:41 am
Which number is larger than 1003 and less than 1005: 6

Recent discovery of “earliest Buddhist shrine” a sham?

Postby plwk » Tue Dec 17, 2013 12:59 pm

In the December 2013 issue of the archaeological journal Antiquity there appears an article by several authors, headed by Prof. Robin Coningham of Durham University. Its appearance has been successfully managed to secure international publicity. The article was embargoed until a specified hour, timed to immediately succeed an announcement to the press in the USA. More here

Return to “News & Current Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests