Elements

Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators

Re: Elements

Postby Malcolm » Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:27 pm

****
Last edited by Malcolm on Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

Though there are infinite liberating gateways of Dharma,
there are none not included in the dimension of the knowledge of the Great Perfection.

-- Buddha Samantabhadri
User avatar
Malcolm
 
Posts: 12322
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Elements

Postby gnegirl » Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:29 pm

adinatha wrote:Teachers will talk openly about the appearances of Togal and what they mean. Teachers will not talk about specifics of method, like postures and gazes. That's the part that's off-limits. ChNN will talk about appearances of tigle and what they mean. Tigle comes even after five lights. So this mum about my question is bullshit.


Someone said no to something you wanted.

Why is this a problem?

We all have different samayas, some more restrictive than others. That has to be respected, since our pure samaya is the root cause of awakening.
"Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise." --Surangama Sutra

Phenomenon, vast as space, dharmata is your base, arising and falling like ocean tide cycles, why do i cling to your illusion of unceasing changlessness?
User avatar
gnegirl
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:22 pm
Location: Waponi Woo

Re: Elements

Postby adinatha » Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:38 pm

Namdrol wrote:Ye shes bla ma is only sufficient to begin practice.


You're a funny guy. This is bullshit. There are oral instructions of Togal even briefer than this.
CAW!
User avatar
adinatha
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:07 am

Re: Elements

Postby Malcolm » Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:44 pm

adinatha wrote:ChNN will talk about appearances of tigle and what they mean. Tigle comes even after five lights. So this mum about my question is bullshit.



ChNN has advised his students not to discuss these issues. He is my root guru.
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

Though there are infinite liberating gateways of Dharma,
there are none not included in the dimension of the knowledge of the Great Perfection.

-- Buddha Samantabhadri
User avatar
Malcolm
 
Posts: 12322
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Elements

Postby Malcolm » Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:45 pm

adinatha wrote:
Namdrol wrote:Ye shes bla ma is only sufficient to begin practice.


You're a funny guy. This is bullshit. There are oral instructions of Togal even briefer than this.


Yes, for example in Yangzab. As I said, insufficient for perfect understanding.

BTW, I meant Khenpo Ngachung's commentaries related to ye shes bl ma, of which there are several.

N
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

Though there are infinite liberating gateways of Dharma,
there are none not included in the dimension of the knowledge of the Great Perfection.

-- Buddha Samantabhadri
User avatar
Malcolm
 
Posts: 12322
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Elements

Postby adinatha » Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:52 pm

Namdrol wrote:
adinatha wrote:ChNN will talk about appearances of tigle and what they mean. Tigle comes even after five lights. So this mum about my question is bullshit.



ChNN has advised his students not to discuss these issues. He is my root guru.


That explains a lot.
CAW!
User avatar
adinatha
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:07 am

Re: Elements

Postby gnegirl » Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:58 pm

adinatha wrote:
Namdrol wrote:Ye shes bla ma is only sufficient to begin practice.


You're a funny guy. This is bullshit. There are oral instructions of Togal even briefer than this.


:tantrum:

Does someone need a nap?
"Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise." --Surangama Sutra

Phenomenon, vast as space, dharmata is your base, arising and falling like ocean tide cycles, why do i cling to your illusion of unceasing changlessness?
User avatar
gnegirl
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:22 pm
Location: Waponi Woo

Re: Elements

Postby adinatha » Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:00 pm

gnegirl wrote:
adinatha wrote:
Namdrol wrote:Ye shes bla ma is only sufficient to begin practice.


You're a funny guy. This is bullshit. There are oral instructions of Togal even briefer than this.


:tantrum:

Does someone need a nap?

:rolling:

My wife made me quite caffeine. Grrr!
Last edited by adinatha on Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CAW!
User avatar
adinatha
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:07 am

Re: Elements

Postby Sherab Dorje » Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:38 pm

Enochian wrote:To tell me more conditioned INFERIOR METHODS plus samaya?!
Whatever dude! It's your psychological well-being, you can do anything you want with it. You might actually look quite fetching in a (extremely) long-sleeved white jacket.
:namaste:
Last edited by Sherab Dorje on Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"When one is not in accord with the true view
Meditation and conduct become delusion,
One will not attain the real result
One will be like a blind man who has no eyes."
Naropa - Summary of the View from The Eight Doha Treasures
User avatar
Sherab Dorje
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 9953
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Elements

Postby username » Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:44 pm

These things were traditionally very secret in Tibet never mind postmodernism and consumerist westerners' angry "I want it all and I want it NOW" attitude. You don't know how one ends up. Even some on certain bhumis go back so we ordinary practitioners have to be extra careful. Look at the two egos doing self PR based on a few experiences in the name of Thogal and printing what was once entrusted on to them. We forget like everything people change too. I don't blame Tibetan masters for being wary considering what unstable range they face.
Last edited by username on Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Dzogchen masters I know say: 1)Buddhist religion essence is Dzogchen 2)Religions are positive by intent/fruit 3)Any method's OK unless: breaking Dzogchen vows, mixed as syncretic (Milanese Soup) 4)Don't join mandalas of opponents of Dalai Lama/Padmasambhava: False Deity inventors by encouraging victims 5)Don't debate Ati with others 6)Don't discuss Ati practices online 7) A master told his old disciple: no one's to discuss his teaching with some others on a former forum nor mention him. Publicity's OK, questions are asked from masters/set teachers in person/email/non-public forums~Best wishes
username
 
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 8:23 pm

Re: Elements

Postby Heruka » Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:46 pm

heres a little something on embryology if anyone wishes to read.

http://www.tibetanmedicine-edu.org/inde ... bryology-1

hope it brings some benefit.
Heruka
 
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:34 am

Re: Dzogchen teaching of Tsongkhapa

Postby swampflower » Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:04 pm

Namdrol wrote:
Will wrote:
Namdrol: prāṇa is a vāyu i.e. prāṇa vāyu (srog dzin rlung) aka "the life sustaining wind". This comes from our breath and no where else.


Not sure about the prana source being only breath. That would mean a deep samadhi state where breath stops, could not last that long - but it does - many hours, days & beyond. Since prana pervades the atmosphere around us, that prana is somehow absorbed during samadhi, without the lungs functioning.


There is also respiration through the skin.

There is no prāṇa as a separate entity. This is a huge misconception. There is a prāṇa vāyu i.e. the breath we inhale.

As far not breathing during certain states of samadhi -- during these state the respiration is so slight it is not noticed. It is still happening however.


I have experienced this state of slight respiration.
It may seem that breath is not occurring but it is very subtly.
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
User avatar
swampflower
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:18 pm
Location: Bellefonte, PA

Re: Elements

Postby Heruka » Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:56 pm

Namdrol, im trying to seperate how the bright flickering of self knowing in the sterile ground of all, pollutes it, simply by this cognition. It seems this simple energy of cognition dulls awareness, and it unfolds and spreads out coemergent, rigpa/marigpa.

is it worth while trying to seperate to understand?

a bit lost in the terminology.
Heruka
 
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:34 am

Re: Elements

Postby Tara » Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:57 pm

Topic temporarily locked for removal of off topic posts etc.

Topic unlocked. Some posts have been deleted. Some posts have been merged into this topic viewtopic.php?f=36&t=3981 and some other posts have been moved to a new topic "Bothersome things about Vajrayana and Dzogchen" viewtopic.php?f=12&t=3995&start=20

This topic is called "Elements" please keep the disucssion within the bounds of what is acceptable and permissible. Please refrain from ad homs and off topic posts.

Regards,
rt
It's not a competition. It's a choice.
Tara
User avatar
Tara
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4329
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:59 am
Location: Who cares!

Re: Elements

Postby Malcolm » Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:18 pm

Heruka wrote:Namdrol, im trying to seperate how the bright flickering of self knowing in the sterile ground of all, pollutes it, simply by this cognition. It seems this simple energy of cognition dulls awareness, and it unfolds and spreads out coemergent, rigpa/marigpa.

is it worth while trying to seperate to understand?

a bit lost in the terminology.



There are two ways to explain this -- one discusses three ignorance: innate, resembling the cause, and imputing ignorances respectively alternately, one discusses two ignorances, innate and imputing. I will stick with the latter explanation for ease.



When the basis arises out of the basis, i.e. when the five lights of wisdom are stirred by vāyu after the shell of the youthful vase body is rent there is a neutral awareness [shes pa lung ma bstan] that does not recognize itself. That simple non-recognition is the innate ignorance. That neutral awareness has two options either it recognizes itself [vidyā], becoming Samantabhadra, or it does not, and through imputing self and other onto the appearance of the basis, creating samsara. That imputation of self and other is the imputing ignorance.

Most people do not realize that Samantabhadra initially possessed the first ignorance. He never possessed the second.

Important point: the nature of the two or three ignorances are the same.

N
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

Though there are infinite liberating gateways of Dharma,
there are none not included in the dimension of the knowledge of the Great Perfection.

-- Buddha Samantabhadri
User avatar
Malcolm
 
Posts: 12322
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Elements

Postby Pero » Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:21 pm

Namdrol wrote:Important point: the nature of the two or three ignorances are the same.

What does that mean?
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Shabkar
Pero
 
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:54 pm

Re: Elements

Postby Malcolm » Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:23 pm

Pero wrote:
Namdrol wrote:Important point: the nature of the two or three ignorances are the same.

What does that mean?



They lack knowledge.
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

Though there are infinite liberating gateways of Dharma,
there are none not included in the dimension of the knowledge of the Great Perfection.

-- Buddha Samantabhadri
User avatar
Malcolm
 
Posts: 12322
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Elements

Postby Heruka » Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:31 pm

Namdrol wrote:Most people do not realize that Samantabhadra initially possessed the first ignorance. He never possessed the second.

Important point: the nature of the two or three ignorances are the same.

N


Yes, this makes sense, since we are here with minds to objectify suchness.
can we discuss the casual or innate ignorance as you say, even though they are empty, it is merely mistaking a white conch for yellow because of some "seeing" defect, this is the root of original straying, it is karmic/time dimension in essence a break in the gzhon nu bum pa'i sku youthful vase?

The 5 lights are samantabhardris radiance, ornaments, i.e. wisdoms.

inner/outer ying, the 5 (or 6 lamps, depending on which tradition one reads) and so forth?
Last edited by Heruka on Sun May 01, 2011 12:49 am, edited 6 times in total.
Heruka
 
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:34 am

Re: Elements

Postby Pero » Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:37 pm

Namdrol wrote:
Pero wrote:
Namdrol wrote:Important point: the nature of the two or three ignorances are the same.

What does that mean?



They lack knowledge.

Ah. :idea:
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Shabkar
Pero
 
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:54 pm

Re: Elements

Postby Paul » Sun May 01, 2011 8:59 am

Namdrol wrote:When the basis arises out of the basis, i.e. when the five lights of wisdom are stirred by vāyu after the shell of the youthful vase body is rent there is a neutral awareness [shes pa lung ma bstan] that does not recognize itself. That simple non-recognition is the innate ignorance. That neutral awareness has two options either it recognizes itself [vidyā], becoming Samantabhadra, or it does not, and through imputing self and other onto the appearance of the basis, creating samsara. That imputation of self and other is the imputing ignorance. 


This sounds very, very similar to the instruction/explanation of a type of ignorance that's mentioned at the beginning of Mipham's "Torch of Certainty". Is it the same?
This nature of mind is spontaneously present.
That spontaneity I was told is the dakini aspect.
Recognizing this should help me
Not to be stuck with fear of being sued.

-Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche
User avatar
Paul
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:12 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Tibetan Buddhism

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jivko, Yahoo [Bot] and 12 guests

>