Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2014 4:02 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 251 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:30 pm
Posts: 117
TMingyur wrote:
devilyoudont wrote:
Do you agree that delusional perspectives exist

Quote:
But when one sees the origination of the world as it actually is with right discernment, 'non-existence' with reference to the world does not occur to one. When one sees the cessation of the world as it actually is with right discernment, 'existence' with reference to the world does not occur to one.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html

Do you honestly believe this to be an apt comparison? I would've thought it was obvious that I was using an expression that employs the verb "exist" in a manner peculiar to English usage, not debating the ultimate nature of existence, the abidance of characteristics or any subject impinging on related topics. "Do you agree that delusional perspectives exist" really means "would you characterize some views in certain contexts as delusional", so it would seem your response amounts to a simple play on words.

I was only asking for a clarification regarding your view, nothing more, but I won't push it if you're not keen on the subject.

:namaste:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:30 pm
Posts: 117
TMingyur wrote:
devilyoudont wrote:
or are all perspectives correct in some way or other, and it's okay not to understand exactly how a view is correct in your opinion?

Quote:
"By & large, Kaccayana, this world is in bondage to attachments, clingings (sustenances), & biases. But one such as this does not get involved with or cling to these attachments, clingings, fixations of awareness, biases, or obsessions; nor is he resolved on 'my self.' He has no uncertainty or doubt that just stress, when arising, is arising; stress, when passing away, is passing away. In this, his knowledge is independent of others. It's to this extent, Kaccayana, that there is right view.

I hope for your sake that you realize this is on the level of disputing a post for using words like "you" and "I", hence "contradicting" Anatman. Discriminating between what is correct and what is incorrect is not the same as clinging to biases, but I'm sure you understand that already. I won't bother you if you'd like me to leave you alone. :bow:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:26 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:09 am
Posts: 2940
Location: Space is the Place
TMingyur wrote:
devilyoudont wrote:
TMingyur wrote:
I applied a metaphor. Trying to convey the meaning of "positive development" and "negative development". Up or down.

Kind regards

Enlightenment is not "positive" or "negative", "up" or "down", "left" or "right", "forwards" or "backwards", "inward" or "outward". There is no potential for it but there's no lack of potential for it either.


Okay. If you choose to put it that way I do not mind.

Kind regards


Whenever the basis of mind and phenomenon is free of all contrived, dualistic conception, it is absolute pure space, which is the basis of all pure phenomenon. But as long as the basis of mind is unaffected by stainless wisdom, it is like a vast ocean which supports many deluded phenomenon. Although the ocean's water is sometimes still, sometimes rippling, sometimes full of waves, and sometimes storming, none of these conditions can ever go beyond the quality of the ocean. The aspects of these phenomenon change from different circumstances which arise through habit, but they never surpass being aspects of the ocean. In the same way, through the habit of delusion, sentient beings take each moment's waves seriously and believe they are permanent and real. Whenever the basis of ordinary mind remains obscured, we may think some phenomenon are real and others are unreal, but all of these phenomenon are deluded and never go beyond samsara's recurring waves. Whenever we attain a precious human birth, we can have faith that Buddha nature can blossom through the pure reflection of Buddha Dharma and our own self-manifesting awareness mind. Through practice, we can recognize our wisdom mind, which releases us from continuous samsaric suffering to reach enlightenment. Buddha's enlightened wisdom mind is like stainless sky, inconceivable, untouchable, and uncatchable, which no one can affect or seed, and whose quality pervades everywhere unobstructedly.
Just as when there are no clouds in the sky and the sunlight pervades everywhere, there are no divisions between the senses in Buddha's stainless wisdom mind. Wisdom mind is from the beginning perfectly self-accomplished wisdom senses. The wisdom senses of the Buddhas are always pure because the wisdom appearance of the Buddhas is only the reflection of the pure display of the wisdom light of sole awareness, which is the self-secret source of all mandalas
. From White Sail, by Thinley Norbu

_________________
Contentment is the ultimate wealth;
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 1782
devilyoudont wrote:
TMingyur wrote:
devilyoudont wrote:
Do you agree that delusional perspectives exist

Quote:
But when one sees the origination of the world as it actually is with right discernment, 'non-existence' with reference to the world does not occur to one. When one sees the cessation of the world as it actually is with right discernment, 'existence' with reference to the world does not occur to one.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html

Do you honestly believe this to be an apt comparison? I would've thought it was obvious that I was using an expression that employs the verb "exist" in a manner peculiar to English usage, not debating the ultimate nature of existence, the abidance of characteristics or any subject impinging on related topics.

Now you are requesting for your own words what you do not grant my words.

devilyoudont wrote:
... so it would seem your response amounts to a simple play on words.

Please consider your responses to my words above.

devilyoudont wrote:
TMingyur wrote:
devilyoudont wrote:
or are all perspectives correct in some way or other, and it's okay not to understand exactly how a view is correct in your opinion?

Quote:
"By & large, Kaccayana, this world is in bondage to attachments, clingings (sustenances), & biases. But one such as this does not get involved with or cling to these attachments, clingings, fixations of awareness, biases, or obsessions; nor is he resolved on 'my self.' He has no uncertainty or doubt that just stress, when arising, is arising; stress, when passing away, is passing away. In this, his knowledge is independent of others. It's to this extent, Kaccayana, that there is right view.

I hope for your sake that you realize this is on the level of disputing a post for using words like "you" and "I", hence "contradicting" Anatman. Discriminating between what is correct and what is incorrect is not the same as clinging to biases, but I'm sure you understand that already. I won't bother you if you'd like me to leave you alone. :bow:

If applying "you" and "I" "contradicts" Anatman that what about applying the word "exist" (see above)?
Can there be a mode of "discrimination" without clinging to the so discriminated? There is the saying of a "discerning wisdom" which I would like to understand as a mode of "discrimination" without clinging to the so discriminated.


Kind regards


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
The Buddha is a product, a result of my understanding,
Dharmakaya is from me alone.

I clean the mirror of what is to see there! Need strong soap.

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
TMingyur wrote:
Whatever these schools are teaching I am following the teachings of the Buddha.

Kind regards


The teachings of the Buddha? You have some special way of contacting him directly? It seems to me you are mainly following your own interpretation of selected suttas from the Theravada tradition.

Anyway it make good discussion which I guess is your main motivating factor. :smile:

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 1782
heart wrote:
You have some special way of contacting him directly?


You have some special way of contacting your guru directly?


Kind regards


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
TMingyur wrote:
heart wrote:
You have some special way of contacting him directly?


You have some special way of contacting your guru directly?


Kind regards


Yes, email works fine. :smile:

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 1782
heart wrote:
TMingyur wrote:
heart wrote:
You have some special way of contacting him directly?


You have some special way of contacting your guru directly?


Kind regards


Yes, email works fine. :smile:

/magnus


If it appears as "directly contacting" to you then this is reason to rejoice.

Kind regards


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
TMingyur wrote:

If it appears as "directly contacting" to you then this is reason to rejoice.

Kind regards


You have no idea how correct that is. Reason to rejoice indeed. :smile: Wishing you the same fortune.

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Potential
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 1782
heart wrote:
Wishing you the same fortune.

Thank you. This is reason to rejoice too.

Kind regards


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 251 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group