Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2014 6:21 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:13 pm
Posts: 1014
What's the difference?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:24 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Budapest
Nirguna Brahman - creator god without attributes (a contradictory statement in itself, for it is absurd to say there is a thing but has no qualities).
Nirvana - the end of suffering, elimination of greed, hatred and ignorance. It is neither a being nor a place but an experience.

_________________
"There is no such thing as the real mind. Ridding yourself of delusion: that's the real mind."
(Sheng-yen: Getting the Buddha Mind, p 73)

"Neither cultivation nor seated meditation — this is the pure Chan of Tathagata."
(Mazu Daoyi, X1321p3b23; tr. Jinhua Jia)

“Don’t rashly seek the true Buddha;
True Buddha can’t be found.
Does marvelous nature and spirit
Need tempering or refinement?
Mind is this mind carefree;
This face, the face at birth."

(Nanyue Mingzan: Enjoying the Way, tr. Jeff Shore; T2076p461b24-26)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am
Posts: 1471
Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:
What's the difference?


According to whom? ie. many different schools and systems use these terms, and their definitions are not the same. It may help to be more specific before asking questions like "What's the difference?"

But one point that can be made, is this: The term "nirvana" is much older, and the term "nirguna brahman" is from a period of Vedanta which has been heavily influenced by Buddhist (& Jain, etc.) thought. Be careful of anachronisms in any comparisons.

_________________
My Prajñācāra Blog
Buddhist Studies at Fo Guang University, Taiwan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:56 pm
Posts: 589
:namaste: Nirguna Brahman, according to Advaita (as far as i am aware) is the non dual state of samata or samatman. there is still a form of self in this realization (though it is not individual), which needs the rope of wisdom to kill itself. (see snake and rope). it is a nondual state in which all things are seen as the same conciousness, but in this state consciousness has not yet been swept away. there is no relationship between nirguna brahman/brahman atman and nirvana. nirguna brahman can become sunyatman, empty of self. when it does so, it ceases to be brahman, or anything. sunyatman is the realization experientially of what always was... no self whatsoever.

i am only speaking from personal experience, this may be considered unhelpful, and if it is, i apologise for any apparent misdirection on my part.

best wishes, White Lotus. x

_________________
in any matters of importance. dont rely on me. i may not know what i am talking about. take what i say as mere speculation. i am not ordained. nor do i have a formal training. i do believe though that if i am wrong on any point. there are those on this site who i hope will quickly point out my mistakes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:13 pm
Posts: 1014
When you say "consciousness" not yet swept away - you mean nama rupa not yet entirely swept away?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:30 pm
Posts: 91
Namaste,

What the hell you guys talkin about?

Namo Amida Butsu

_________________
Image
"Just say the nembutsu and be liberated" Shinran Shonin
"However hard it may be to bid farewell to this world, when the conditions that bind us to this saha [samsara] realm run out, we are powerless to do anything as the final hour arrives and we are swept away to that Land." -A Record in Lament of Divergences


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 3:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:41 am
Posts: 2776
Quote:
What the hell you guys talkin about?

Something about between the devil and the deep blue sea.... :tongue:

_________________
TWTB BIES OCB DDM BWF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 3:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:56 pm
Posts: 589
:namaste: Dear friends,

When you say "consciousness" not yet swept away - you mean nama rupa not yet entirely swept away?

if you want to waste your time read on...

consciousness is one of the five skhandas, it needs to be swept away if a state of sunyatman is to be attained. every 'thing' must be swept away in order to attain sunyatman, the emptiness body. once everything has been swept away including perception of a self, then one perceives the base on which emptiness/form rests. there is no direction for the mind then, but to become the base. 'this' is acheived by 'this'. this cannot be annihilated, it is absolutely eternal, indestructible, immutable, unchanging. it is what we call suchness.

its reassuring that in ones practice one is still 'this', inspite of having brushed away the five skhandas and direct experience of self/the 5 skhandas.

having said that there is still 'this', if a less developed mind annihilates the five skhandas one can be trapped in limbo. so it can be dangerous to do so. by limbo i mean that the 'this' that the mind perceives is corroded and replaced by nothingness.

please note that this is only my own experience, and is by no means orthodox. this is the direction that my path has taken.

now, i would say that no special experience or realization is needed. that all of the states mentioned above are unnecessary. that, the buddha is the buddha regardless of any forms of attainment or lack of attainment.

realization of no-self is not necessary.
the bhumis are not necessary.
knowledge of the true nature is not necessary.
meditation is not necessary.
enlightenment is not necessary.

you have it, just as you are.

it is not necessary to follow the spiritual path to realize this. there is nothing to realize. everyone and everything is perfect, just as it is. i follow a path, because i do not wish to be negatively affected by cause and effect, but fundamentally even cause and effect are only apparent. actually there is no cause nor effect. at root all is empty. there is nothing to worry about.

suchness:-
this is it,
Tom is it,
the computer is it,
my meditation is it,
my lack of meditation is it,
the sky is it,
pain is it,
comfort is it,
pop music is it,
jazz is it,
romantic novels is it,
rock is it,
classics are it,
just chilling is it,
working your ass off is it,
so... just make a cup of tea!

you cant get away from it... all is perfect enlightenment. just as it is.
nothing to be, nothing to become. just as you are. this is it.

love, White Lotus. x

WHO NEEDS TO SWEEP AWAY CONSCIOUSNESS?!!!
NO ONE.

_________________
in any matters of importance. dont rely on me. i may not know what i am talking about. take what i say as mere speculation. i am not ordained. nor do i have a formal training. i do believe though that if i am wrong on any point. there are those on this site who i hope will quickly point out my mistakes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Asbestos Buddha, Indrajala and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group