gregkavarnos wrote:News flash! Samsara is not just planet earth and it's not just the human and animal realms...
gregkavarnos wrote:You are stuck on form, what about the hell and hungry ghost realm? Why do you consider that every animal that is slaughtered ends up a human being? Your assumptions don't really hold ground.
Karma Dorje wrote:gregkavarnos wrote:You are stuck on form, what about the hell and hungry ghost realm? Why do you consider that every animal that is slaughtered ends up a human being? Your assumptions don't really hold ground.
Greg, please show me where I suggested "every animal that is slaughtered ends up a human being".
greentara wrote:But the Buddha, Milerepa, Ramana Maharshi and Nisargadatta showed spontaneous celibacy, not forced, not contrived.... a divine pouring out of purity.
uan wrote:Since the ~1.7B people alive in 1900 are mostly dead (except for the odd 113 year old or 2) then to get to the 7B alive now, your implying that billions of animals, specifically, the animals that have been slaughtered, have taken rebirth in the human realm, at least to the extent that these specific hypothetical rebirths are contributing to whatever "neuroses" humanity is beginning to resemble.
So you're not saying that every animal slaughtered is taking human rebirth, but you are saying that the majority of all humans being born are from the slaughtered animal realm. In addition, that they bring a similar and specific mind stream into the human realm of what you imagine to be their experience of their life and death (who knows the causes and conditions that brought them to being born as animals led to the slaughter in the first place?). And that this mass mind stream is creating a super-mindstream that is the root of humanity's neuorses/problems/issues.
I'm not opposed to the concept of the Jungian collective unconscious, but could you expand more on what traditions of Buddhism goes deeper into your interpretation of what's been going on?
Clearly I'm dubious, but I will be sincerely open to further clarification.
Karma Dorje wrote:Where are you getting this bit about neuroses? I have also not suggested anything about a collective unconscious. I am saying that as animals are habituated to certain patterns of conceptuality and emotion, these samskaras carry through into future lives, individually.
Karma Dorje wrote:It stands to reason that the neuroses of humanity begin to resemble those of the animal realm.

Karma Dorje wrote:Just the actions of countless confused individuals that we abstract to general trends.
greentara wrote:dzogchungpa, I included Nisargadata to the celibate listing as even though he was a married man, with children and a business to run in his early years; his gurus teaching made such an impact on him that after reaching liberation he left his family and wandered about homeless in a state of bliss for years. He had a chance meeting with a fellow devotee who convinced him to go home. Coming back he found most of his shops had collapsed, only one shop remaining, he accepted this humble business would be just enough to support the family. His wife passed away and he never entertained the thought of remarriage. Years later when devotees came from all over the world to sit at his feet he discouraged romantic or sexual questions. All discussions were centered around spiritual matters and the absolute.
uan wrote:You brought up neuroses, specifically the "neuroses of humanity". Since you are using this as a broad term to refer basically to everyone who is alive today, that carries, at the minimum, the flavor of a collective unconscious (a term I did introduce to the conversation), whereby since everyone is carrying individually the samskaras of their recent animal lives and you say this is collectively flavoring the "neuroses of humanity". A neuroses you imply that is either something new or somehow different now than it's been before (as if humanity's previous neuroses, aka samsara, was somehow better?).
uan wrote:So I get the idea of how one's previous life carries forward, but the leap I'm struggling with is, unless you are a Buddha, how do you know from which realms etc those being born today are coming from? Not only do you state they are from the animal realm, but that they are from slaughtered animals. You cannot know that.
uan wrote:You're projecting your own mind onto reality, which we all do, but that doesn't make your reality true. You're also making judgments on whether that is good or bad and whether "it" is different than it was before.
uan wrote:Also, the characteristics you are pointing to have been around in humanity for as long as we've had recorded history, at least from the time of the Agricultural/Neolithic Revolution. And certainly have been put into writing since Darwin and the whole concept of the survival of the fittest. Which is before this imagined influx of rebirths from the slaughtered animal realm.
Ayn Rand is even considered a writer and philosopher. If that isn't a sign of Kali Yuga, I don't know what is.

Karma Dorje wrote:uan wrote:You're projecting your own mind onto reality, which we all do, but that doesn't make your reality true. You're also making judgments on whether that is good or bad and whether "it" is different than it was before.
I am not projecting my mind onto reality. I am presenting a reasoning based on the teachings. Good or bad is irrelevant and another concept like the collective unconscious that I have not brought up in this discussion.
Look at how degraded things have become!
greentara wrote:dzogchungpa, I included Nisargadata to the celibate listing as even though he was a married man, with children and a business to run in his early years; his gurus teaching made such an impact on him that after reaching liberation he left his family and wandered about homeless in a state of bliss for years. He had a chance meeting with a fellow devotee who convinced him to go home. Coming back he found most of his shops had collapsed, only one shop remaining, he accepted this humble business would be just enough to support the family. His wife passed away and he never entertained the thought of remarriage. Years later when devotees came from all over the world to sit at his feet he discouraged romantic or sexual questions. All discussions were centered around spiritual matters and the absolute.
uan wrote:The teachings also talk about an infinite number of beings in the 10 directions of the universe etc. You're painting a picture that there is some sort of bull pen and as more people get born that there is a dearth of beings who've been previously in the human realm to come back and take rebirth. You're effectively saying "do the math" there's no way the beings taking rebirth could have come from anywhere but the animal realms. And those that are slaughtered at that.
greentara wrote:karma dorje, "However, with the wholesale slaughter of livestock in recent years the simplest explanation is that the majority of these "new" humans were animals from here" Thats quite a statement, thats a long bow to draw!
Karma Dorje wrote:Saying something sounds like something else doesn't refute it. Regardless, zero sum is irrelevant. Those that are human now are quite obviously not accounted for by the number of humans that existed on the earth prior to 1900. Unless you are saying that there are 5.3 billion tulkus that account for the difference, there is a 1:1 correlation that needs to be explained. Where are these sentient beings coming from? An actual argument for your position would be welcomed.
Users browsing this forum: vinodh and 7 guests