What about the dharma seal that mentions nirvana though? What is nirvana? A state of freedom from karma and affliction. So I would argue it is there, even if the exact word does not appear.But here is one thing that puzzles me: a teaching is supposed to be Buddhist if it contains the Three (or Four) Dharma Seals. However, none of these Dharma Seals talks about karma and rebirth!
Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Last edited by JKhedrup on Tue May 07, 2013 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
If there is no karma and rebirth then what happens to sentient beings if they do not achieve liberation within this lifetime? Suddenly death becomes a form of liberation from samsara. So every dead sentient being achieves the same state as the Buddha. Annihilation = liberation.
But how do you explain why some sentient beings are born as animals (we'll leave aside the formless or subtle form realms since Batchelor rejects those too because they do not fit into his theory)? Some weak and some strong? And, born as human beings, some rich some poor. Some smart some stupid? Ad nauseum?
Luck of the draw?
It does not work at any level.
If all life leads to liberation then why is there such an incredible variety of life? On what is it based? Surely the process of evolution would have factored for a single simple and very short lived life form. Why would life exist at all? If there is no karma vipakka then what drives existence?
But we can see, even at the basest level, that actions bring outcomes: You hit your finger with a hammer, it hurts.
Rather than saying that the West misunderstands Buddhism I would say that Mr Batchelor misunderstands Buddhism, that is why his critique of it is full of holes.
But how do you explain why some sentient beings are born as animals (we'll leave aside the formless or subtle form realms since Batchelor rejects those too because they do not fit into his theory)? Some weak and some strong? And, born as human beings, some rich some poor. Some smart some stupid? Ad nauseum?
Luck of the draw?
It does not work at any level.
If all life leads to liberation then why is there such an incredible variety of life? On what is it based? Surely the process of evolution would have factored for a single simple and very short lived life form. Why would life exist at all? If there is no karma vipakka then what drives existence?
But we can see, even at the basest level, that actions bring outcomes: You hit your finger with a hammer, it hurts.
Rather than saying that the West misunderstands Buddhism I would say that Mr Batchelor misunderstands Buddhism, that is why his critique of it is full of holes.
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Sometimes I like the way your mind works, Greg. You'd be good on the debating ground.If there is no karma and rebirth then what happens to sentient beings if they do not achieve liberation within this lifetime? Suddenly death becomes a form of liberation from samsara. So every dead sentient being achieves the same state as the Buddha. Annihilation = liberation.
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
I dont think Batchelor misunderstands Buddhism...by which I mean he has a thorough grasp of its philosophical underpinning.
I think what he does is actively reject much of the philosophy of Buddhism, but that he wants to retain some of the Upaya.
What is happening is an experiment to ascertain to what degree that is possible and viable.
Of course it is possible to argue that any attempt to retain Upaya in isolation from its conceptual base is in itself the result of misunderstanding.
I think what he does is actively reject much of the philosophy of Buddhism, but that he wants to retain some of the Upaya.
What is happening is an experiment to ascertain to what degree that is possible and viable.
Of course it is possible to argue that any attempt to retain Upaya in isolation from its conceptual base is in itself the result of misunderstanding.
Last edited by Simon E. on Tue May 07, 2013 11:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
“You don’t know it. You just know about it. That is not the same thing.”
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
- dharmagoat
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
So Buddhahood is death? Why would anyone aspire to that?If there is no karma and rebirth then what happens to sentient beings if they do not achieve liberation within this lifetime? Suddenly death becomes a form of liberation from samsara. So every dead sentient being achieves the same state as the Buddha. Annihilation = liberation.
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
He would probably answer that "liberation" refers to liberation from suffering for the remainder of this life. And that this is somehow what Buddha meant all along.gregkavarnos wrote:If there is no karma and rebirth then what happens to sentient beings if they do not achieve liberation within this lifetime? Suddenly death becomes a form of liberation from samsara. So every dead sentient being achieves the same state as the Buddha. Annihilation = liberation.
Of course, one then has to wonder why Buddha bothered to leave his perfect life in the palace in the first place.
Please consider donating to help find a cure for Degenerative Vitreous Syndrome:
http://www.gofundme.com/floaters
http://www.gofundme.com/floaters
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Excellent post Greg, straight to the heart of the matter.gregkavarnos wrote:If there is no karma and rebirth then what happens to sentient beings if they do not achieve liberation within this lifetime? Suddenly death becomes a form of liberation from samsara. So every dead sentient being achieves the same state as the Buddha. Annihilation = liberation.
But how do you explain why some sentient beings are born as animals (we'll leave aside the formless or subtle form realms since Batchelor rejects those too because they do not fit into his theory)? Some weak and some strong? And, born as human beings, some rich some poor. Some smart some stupid? Ad nauseum?
Luck of the draw?
It does not work at any level.
If all life leads to liberation then why is there such an incredible variety of life? On what is it based? Surely the process of evolution would have factored for a single simple and very short lived life form. Why would life exist at all? If there is no karma vipakka then what drives existence?
But we can see, even at the basest level, that actions bring outcomes: You hit your finger with a hammer, it hurts.
Rather than saying that the West misunderstands Buddhism I would say that Mr Batchelor misunderstands Buddhism, that is why his critique of it is full of holes.
I would just say....if these basic foundations of Buddhism are rejected as false/unnecessary etc.....What is the point in practicing? either Zen, Vajrayana or anything inbetween? I mean, surely then all the skillful means in Batchelor's toolbox would be completely pointless...
Greg, as he often does, has cut to the basic point...Batchelor has, from an original foundation in Buddhism, became dissatisfied with Dharma and changed it according to his own delusion. It is 'Batchelorism', he doesn't use the term 'Buddhism' as "a handy peg to hang things on", he uses it to add credibility to his own brand of philosophy.
s.
- dharmagoat
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Seriously, Greg?gregkavarnos wrote:But how do you explain why some sentient beings are born as animals (we'll leave aside the formless or subtle form realms since Batchelor rejects those too because they do not fit into his theory)? Some weak and some strong? And, born as human beings, some rich some poor. Some smart some stupid? Ad nauseum?
Luck of the draw?
It does not work at any level.
If all life leads to liberation then why is there such an incredible variety of life? On what is it based? Surely the process of evolution would have factored for a single simple and very short lived life form. Why would life exist at all? If there is no karma vipakka then what drives existence?
- dharmagoat
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Because, he tells us, he was unhappy living that way.mirage wrote:Of course, one then has to wonder why Buddha bothered to leave his perfect life in the palace in the first place.
- dharmagoat
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Pointless if your only motivation is to achieve an unrealistic goal.Stewart wrote:I would just say....if these basic foundations of Buddhism are rejected as false/unnecessary etc.....What is the point in practicing? either Zen, Vajrayana or anything inbetween? I mean, surely then all the skillful means in Batchelor's toolbox would be completely pointless...
He assures us he doesn't, but you say he does. I believe Stephen Bachelor.Stewart wrote:Greg, as he often does, has cut to the basic point...Batchelor has, from an original foundation in Buddhism, became dissatisfied with Dharma and changed it according to his own delusion. It is 'Batchelorism', he doesn't use the term 'Buddhism' as "a handy peg to hang things on", he uses it to add credibility to his own brand of philosophy.
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Just a checking question. Is there anyone who proved it ain't so?gregkavarnos wrote:If there is no karma and rebirth then what happens to sentient beings if they do not achieve liberation within this lifetime? Suddenly death becomes a form of liberation from samsara. So every dead sentient being achieves the same state as the Buddha. Annihilation = liberation.
Conditions?But how do you explain why some sentient beings are born as animals (we'll leave aside the formless or subtle form realms since Batchelor rejects those too because they do not fit into his theory)? Some weak and some strong? And, born as human beings, some rich some poor. Some smart some stupid? Ad nauseum?
Luck of the draw?
Why one radio gives good quality sound, and other adds noise?
Society is developing without leaning on rebirth, so maybe there is another entity not driven by liberation, that benefits from it. Like a pyramid it shapes itself from different building blocks. For example gnostics believed that Light is enslaved by a different force that benefits from this enslavement.If all life leads to liberation then why is there such an incredible variety of life? On what is it based?
Maybe there are many gravity based forces, not only the one related to matter. Maybe some force pulls in different directions. Life forms tend to organize into societies with specific direction, like something was pulling it. The third force, awareness which desires to return to peace. Three forces overlapping in living beings.
Those are random ideas out of the blue, but can you refute them?
No doubt.... only those Dzogchen teachings discarding causality always puzzled me.gregkavarnos wrote:But we can see, even at the basest level, that actions bring outcomes: You hit your finger with a hammer, it hurts.
Say what you think about me here.
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
I don't understand your question (if it is a question).dharmagoat wrote:Seriously, Greg?
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
If he knew you said this, three keisaku whacks coming up...I believe Stephen Bachelor
- dharmagoat
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
I was hoping the question wasn't rhetorical.gregkavarnos wrote:I don't understand your question (if it is a question).dharmagoat wrote:Seriously, Greg?
You are a good sport, Greg.
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
The Budha (and countless other realised beings).oushi wrote:Just a checking question. Is there anyone who proved it ain't so?
And what is the cause of the variety of conditions?Conditions?
I do not really understand what you are saying here.Society is developing without leaning on rebirth, so maybe there is another entity not driven by liberation, that benefits from it. Like a pyramid it shapes itself from different building blocks. For example gnostics believed that Light is enslaved by a different force that benefits from this enslavement.
Maybe there are many gravity based forces, not only the one related to matter. Maybe some force pulls in different directions. Life forms tend to organize into societies with specific direction, like something was pulling it. The third force, awareness which desires to return to peace. Three forces overlapping in living beings.
This is probably the cause of my confusion.Those are random ideas out of the blue...
Dzogchen does not discard causality.No doubt.... only those Dzogchen teachings discarding causality always puzzled me.
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
I am a bit wary about the equation "annihilation = liberation". What is beyond the wheel of life and death is not simply non-existence. Of course we can't conceive of what it is but it is not nothing.
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
- dharmagoat
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Do you deny any randomness in the universe?gregkavarnos wrote:And what is the cause of the variety of conditions?
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Oushi...you should have stayed with gnomic Zennisms.
You have exposed yourself.
You have exposed yourself.
“You don’t know it. You just know about it. That is not the same thing.”
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
Notice that I wrote about discarding, not denying.CrawfordHollow wrote: but just to set the record straight dzogchen does not deny causality in the least.
That would be the point of discarding causality, and since it is from the point of true nature of mind, it is true. Right?CrawfordHollow wrote:The quote presented was from the point of view of rigpa, the base, the true nature of mind
I don't know, how can I know what is the evidence supporting a views that you didn't bother to provide?gregkavarnos wrote:How many of the materialists have shown that there view is supported and what is the evidence?
Why should I trust Batchlor? Did I said anywhere that I believe in what he is saying?gregkavarnos wrote:Tell you what: you can trust (believe) what Batchlor (and his buddies) says and I will trust (believe) what the Buddha and other realised beings said and when Yama comes to visit we will compare notes. Deal?
All this was aimed to show the illusion like nature of the sphere we are in. If we all believe in something, and no one is able to prove superiority of his belief, we shouldn't focus on criticising views of others. I know that there may be a desire to save people from wrong interpretations, but if we cannot prove our view, how can we disprove beliefs of others?
Check out my question again. I asked, what caused this change. From the rebirth point of view, the biggest change since the beginning of our planet took place, and... we don't know crap about it. But... it can be explained by improving standards of life, and natural growth, quite easily. Questioned, you can always say that we have 7 bln people because pretas rushed to earth.gregkavarnos wrote:You see, this is what happens when you cherry pick a complete system. Rebirth can also occur from the other four realms (hell, preta, deva, asura) and beings reborn on the planet earth do not necessarily have to come from the planet earth (though, due to karmic connections, it is more likely).
Say what you think about me here.
- Johnny Dangerous
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
- Location: Olympia WA
- Contact:
Re: Uncertain Minds: How the West Misunderstands Buddhism
If you take Buddhist cosmologies as a whole -with vertical and horizontal arrangements of almost infinite dimension as mentioned in various sutra etc,, our little corner of reality is not a particularly large one, so that kind of shift in population might mean very little. Does nothing to prove or disprove Karma really.oushi wrote: On the other hand. During last 200 years, the population of the world grew 7 times. What caused this incredible growth in great human birth? Reduction of animals? Why did the birth cycle reshape itself so profoundly, almost beyond belief from the reincarnation point of view.
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama