the trial of henry kissinger

Anything goes (almost).

the trial of henry kissinger

Postby Heruka » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:32 am

Heruka
 
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:34 am

Re: the trial of henry kissinger

Postby Mr. G » Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:19 am

This was a good documentary. :thumbsup:
    How foolish you are,
    grasping the letter of the text and ignoring its intention!
    - Vasubandhu
User avatar
Mr. G
 
Posts: 4098
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Spaceship Earth

Re: the trial of henry kissinger

Postby Heruka » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:17 am

new update.


“The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy. And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern.” — Henry Kissinger



Christopher Hitchens:

Latest Nixon tape buries Kissinger’s reputation


“The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy. And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern.” — Henry Kissinger


In the past, Kissinger has defended his role as enabler to Nixon’s psychopathic bigotry, saying that he acted as a restraining influence on his boss by playing along and making soothing remarks. This can now go straight into the lavatory pan, along with his other hysterical lies. Obsessed as he was with the Jews, Nixon never came close to saying that he’d be indifferent to a replay of Auschwitz. For this, Kissinger deserves sole recognition.

It’s hard to know how to classify this observation in the taxonomy of obscenity. Should it be counted as tactical Holocaust pre-denial? That would be too mild. It’s actually a bit more like advance permission for another Holocaust. Which is why I wonder how long the official spokesmen of American Jewry are going to keep so quiet. Nothing remotely as revolting as this was ever uttered by Jesse Jackson or even Mel Gibson, to name only two famous targets of the wrath of the Anti-Defamation League. Where is the outrage? Is Kissinger — normally beseeched for comments on subjects about which he knows little or nothing — going to be able to sit out requests from the media that he clarify this statement? Does he get to keep his op-ed perch in reputable newspapers with nothing said? Will the publishers of his mendacious and purloined memoirs continue to give him expensive lunches as if nothing has happened?



Read more: http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/201 ... z18XIESEwA




http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/201 ... eputation/
Heruka
 
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:34 am


Return to Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

>