plwk wrote:I wuz wunderin abt Cat Sangha....(No dogs allowed policy?
)
catmoon wrote:Things are settling down since the demise of E Sangha. The new landscape, as I see it, is Dhamma Wheel for the Theravadins, this place for the Mahayanists and FreeSangha for the, uh, pan-Buddhists I guess.
ball-of-string wrote:catmoon wrote:Things are settling down since the demise of E Sangha. The new landscape, as I see it, is Dhamma Wheel for the Theravadins, this place for the Mahayanists and FreeSangha for the, uh, pan-Buddhists I guess.
Except I see all the same people on all 3 sites, including you Brother!
catmoon wrote:Things are settling down since the demise of E Sangha. The new landscape, as I see it, is Dhamma Wheel for the Theravadins, this place for the Mahayanists and FreeSangha for the, uh, pan-Buddhists I guess.
Are there any other important boards out there?
Huseng wrote:catmoon wrote:Things are settling down since the demise of E Sangha. The new landscape, as I see it, is Dhamma Wheel for the Theravadins, this place for the Mahayanists and FreeSangha for the, uh, pan-Buddhists I guess.
Are there any other important boards out there?
If you want to see some oldschool internet Buddhism go to
http://groups.google.com/
and look through the archives dating back more than a decade. There are actually familiar E-Sangha names like Namdrol.
I kind of wish we could have more academic oriented discussions here. At E-sangha we managed to have a lot more.
Yogicfire wrote:I find these sites a little flat in comparison right now. But, maybe they will develop in time.
I will be interested in seeing how it goes... Thanks to the people who took time out to set these sites up. Nice to see some old faces.

catmoon wrote:Things are settling down since the demise of E Sangha. The new landscape, as I see it, is Dhamma Wheel for the Theravadins, this place for the Mahayanists and FreeSangha for the, uh, pan-Buddhists I guess.
Are there any other important boards out there?
noclue wrote:This is a powerful medium and people often come to these fora as a first point in their spiritual quest. What they find may well have a huge influence on the course of their journey. So it may serve us well to keep this in mind and create a space to nurture all that is genuine, clear, radiant, compassionate and free within and without and shine light on what is confused, conflicted and confining.
noclue wrote:Forums are largely a collective result of the members interaction. If people see the potential in online Buddhist interaction they should put energy into it and the forums will liven up.
Personally I find there is too much to do in the "physical" world to spend much time online but this must vary depending on commitments.
This is a powerful medium and people often come to these fora as a first point in their spiritual quest. What they find may well have a huge influence on the course of their journey. So it may serve us well to keep this in mind and create a space to nurture all that is genuine, clear, radiant, compassionate and free within and without and shine light on what is confused, conflicted and confining.
We are having the tools of intelligence which is super. We can use it in correct way while not becoming frustrated or lost in confusion and conflicts, as the path to samsara and nirvana are in the use of conceptual constructs "not far" from each other. The trap of satisfying analytical habits is a clinging one in debates. Nobody is helped by that.noclue wrote:The answer is in my post, if you read the second half of the sentence.
But this is just a suggestion which I am sure can be pulled apart with enough diligence.![]()
Or it could be used for something else entirely.
According to one's inclination.
shel wrote:noclue wrote:The answer is in my post, if you read the second half of the sentence.
You mean, "shine light on what is confused, conflicted and confining."
I will point out that in order to shine light on what is confused, conflicted and confining we need to ourselves not be confused, conflicted and confined, because if we are confused, conflicted and confined we will be shining light that is confused, conflicted and confined. Shining confused, conflicted and confined light onto what is confused, conflicted and confined will only result in more confusion, conflicting and confinement.
But wait I have a solution to this dilemma!
Screen everyone for their ability to shine genuine, clear, radiant, compassionate, free within and without, light.
Oh but that won't work. We need to have what is confused, conflicted and confining on the forum in oder to shine genuine, clear, radiant, compassionate, free within and without, light on it.
But wait I have a solution to this dilemma!
We can let a little bit of what is confused, conflicted and confined on the forum. If there's a little bit of confusion, conflicting and confinement, a manageable amount, that'll be perfect!
The only question that seems to remain is how much confusion, conflicting and confinement can you handle Mr. Noclue?But this is just a suggestion which I am sure can be pulled apart with enough diligence.![]()
I think that I did pretty well, if I may say so myself.Or it could be used for something else entirely.
You mean like something, oh, I don't know... EVIL!!
According to one's inclination.
Personally, I'm inclined to shine light on what is confused, conflicted and confining. But this is fun too.
I will point out that in order to shine light on what is confused, conflicted and confining we need to ourselves not be confused, conflicted and confined, because if we are confused, conflicted and confined we will be shining light that is confused, conflicted and confined.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests