analysis behind meditation

Anything goes (almost).

analysis behind meditation

Postby greentara » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:38 pm

"Lindsay Gellman reviews an analysis of science behind meditation in the January 6 Wall Street Journal : Meditation has limited benefits, study finds.
As TMFree readers would expect, meditation is not the save-all panacea for which it's marketed.
The majority of studies on Transcendental Meditation (TM) are NOT controlled studies, thus are weak. For example, TM studies do not compare TM with mindfulness meditation, prayer, buddhist chanting, nor with daily napping or exercise"

My 'beef' with the analysis is that it was released by the Wall St Journal. The journal is only interested in hard outcomes and subtleness is indeed foreign to this rag.
Its also hard to take TM seriously as it conjures up people jumping on trampolines and thinking they're levitating!
The biggest problem of all is they see meditation as a product to be marketed.
I wouldn't be surprised at all if in the near future they see Tibetan Buddhist mediation as a brand.
greentara
 
Posts: 892
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:03 am

Re: analysis behind meditation

Postby dharmagoat » Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:24 pm

Anything that debunks TM is good news.
User avatar
dharmagoat
 
Posts: 993
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm

Re: analysis behind meditation

Postby duckfiasco » Sun Jan 19, 2014 2:26 am

Approaching meditation as an isolated desire-driven means to an end, usually a very specific end of new and improved ego, is a great hindrance to any actual benefit for oneself or others. I'm not surprised at all.
Please take the above post with a grain of salt.
User avatar
duckfiasco
 
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:11 am
Location: Oregon

Re: analysis behind meditation

Postby lesliejoyB » Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:54 am

Nice analysis. With meditation, you will be relaxed and think well.
lesliejoyB
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:13 am


Return to Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

>