Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2014 4:52 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:03 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
Jesse wrote:
Psychology works with intangibles; experiences, emotions, thoughts, and habits, and that is exactly why it is considered a soft science.

Just my 2c.
Well, you can just take your 2c back buddy. You are describing psychotherapy, not psychology. I am a qualified psychologist. In order (back in my day) to qualify as a psychologist you had to be a behavioural scientist. I have spent more time gathering and analysing statistics, learning correct data evaluation techniques, learning and applying experimental models, etc... then most of my "hard science" engineer friends.

We never once asked how anybody felt or thought about anything. NEVER.

Neurobiology was big! Even "split brain theory" quacks had to prove it neurologically.

When I was an impressionable teenager I read Freud's book "The Psychopathology of Everyday Life" and thought to myself: That's it, I am going to study psychology. Boy was I wrong. The only time we studied Freud was to shoot him down in flames for drawing conclusions without utilising the scientific method.

Only during my graduate diploma in social sciences did I meet a Freudian (family therapist) and he was a quack. Actually, just about every psychotherapist I have met is a quack. To tell the truth, I consider all psychotherapists quacks. My grad dip studies were also my first encounter with therapeutic models. All sorts of dumb-ass unproven (and unprovable) nonsense. Here in Greece the Psychologists "Union" is trying to unquack the field of psychotherapy by insisting that all psychotherapists have to have psychological (scientific) or psychiatric (medical) qualifications: ie a two week course at the online university of holistic paranormal psychotherapy is just not going to be enough of a qualification any more. Actually, claiming this as a qualification will end up being grounds for legal prosecution.

PS Where I am from psychologists are not authorised to prescribe medicines of any type, that is a job for a medical professional (psychiatrist).

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:38 pm
Posts: 239
Quote:
Actually, just about every psychotherapist I have met is a quack. To tell the truth, I consider all psychotherapists quacks.


Quack Quack! :smile:

_________________
“Don't you know that a midnight hour comes when everyone has to take off his mask? Do you think life always lets itself be trifled with? Do you think you can sneak off a little before midnight to escape this?”
― Søren Kierkegaard


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:23 am
Posts: 682
Location: Canada
I have received excellent medical treatment from witch doctors. One even refused payment and directed me to Western medical treatments. Practicing a broken paradigm does not exclude the ability to heal, especially if you are not in it to get paid. I did not need to believe in it either. Some practitioners transcend technique.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:26 pm
Posts: 501
In California, land of psych, you have to have a PhD to be a psychologist and at least a Masters to practice psychotherapy. In either case, it's quite a thorough program. There is licensing. Even the masters receive some training in the effect of pharmaceuticals, tho neither group can prescribe them. It is important to monitor their effect and it sounds like the lack is the source of much of the concern in this conversation. I abandoned psych in the 60s precisely because it was so statistically oriented. In the 90's I was on track for a PhD and quit ABD. In the end, for me, the medical model was not what I wanted. While the training is necessary, it by no means is a guarantee that the treatment will be effective. It is a bit of a mystery how intention and treatment play together, when they do. Have to agree, it's a primitive science.

Doesn't it come down to the quality of the relationship in the end? I've known psychiatrists who are truly clueless about life, and grandma's who carry great wisdom. It seems important to acknowledge that not everyone can be cured. Indiginous peoples had compassionate ways to take care of all members in the tribe and everybody had a place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
AlexanderS wrote:
I know quite a lot of psychology students and they mostly quite kind intelligent people.


That's right, Alexander. There are of course all kinds of people going for different reasons to study psychology or other faculty but there are those who are having the wish to help in a more respectful human way and so not in a way of merely cases or for own welfare only. There is also a lot of Buddhism by examples as looking for the I in the brain or elsewhere. There are questions as how can you be when I am not. There is for some the recognition of interdependency of all things arisen by these and so the lack of an existence on itself. There is also interess into the different kinds of consciousness. Then there can arise a genuine interess for the Buddhas teachings and practices, which include the very care for all. All this depends on the student of course.

:namaste:

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:23 am
Posts: 682
Location: Canada
It is fascinating how different the field is from country to country. In some psychiatry/psychology are integrated. In others the two seem to be at each others throats. It seems that the very definition of the field and scope of practice changes every time you cross a border.

I did not find this with emergency or surgical interventions when I was traveling.

I am getting tired of the OR and am too old to go back to paramedicine. I have some time and would like to learn an alternative healing art. There are many involved in such practices here. What are some of the best alternate methods of healing once you have burned out on Western medicine ? I am so tired of treating symptoms.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
Aryuveda and Tibetan medicine, and some aspects of Chinese medicine are worthwhile imo, including acupuncture.
Physiotherapy is very useful.


I would recommend avoiding homeopathy, reiki,crystals, and similar ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 3:23 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
Nemo wrote:
It is fascinating how different the field is from country to country. In some psychiatry/psychology are integrated. In others the two seem to be at each others throats. It seems that the very definition of the field and scope of practice changes every time you cross a border.
It is Psychology/psychiatry vs Psychotherapy. I don't think you will find psychologists and psychiatrists at each others throats (so much).

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:35 pm 
Online
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Posts: 3037
Location: Olympia WA
Nemo wrote:
It is fascinating how different the field is from country to country. In some psychiatry/psychology are integrated. In others the two seem to be at each others throats. It seems that the very definition of the field and scope of practice changes every time you cross a border.

I did not find this with emergency or surgical interventions when I was traveling.

I am getting tired of the OR and am too old to go back to paramedicine. I have some time and would like to learn an alternative healing art. There are many involved in such practices here. What are some of the best alternate methods of healing once you have burned out on Western medicine ? I am so tired of treating symptoms.



Especially being in Canada, you should look into massage therapy...for the most part it is evidence based (as much as any CAM therapy is at the moment) and generally down to earth, basic concepts of kinesiology and anatomy and physiology that you have the advantage of probably already being familiar with. I've been told that Canada has some of the best programs for it in the world.

Naturally it is a broad and somewhat undefined field...what it am talking about is various modalities of "manual therapy" for the treatment of injuries and chronic pain mostly, rather than going to get what's termed a 'relaxation massage' where there is no real attempt at treatment, as well as er..the other massage field, which i'm sure I don't need to go into detail about.

I have a rare spinal condition and chronic pain and have benefitted immensely from massage therapy, that and tailored exercise regimens have brought me to nearly being symptom free. That's what got me to go to school for it, being convinced of it's efficacy personally after basically a lifetime of nagging (and plenty of times worse than nagging) pain. It's a very rewarding job on a personal if you can handle the wear and tear on your body, and use good body mechanics when working.

_________________
"We're chained to the world and we all gotta pull" -Tom Waits


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
I have benefited personally from Chiropractic, although I know it has its critics.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:26 pm
Posts: 501
Second Chiropractic, there are many styles. Also, CranioSacral (beyond Upledger). It unwound the energetic part of lymes for me. Amazing!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:29 am
Posts: 761
Location: Oregon
If I were to become a Doctor I would go with Functional medicine. This was where I ended up when I figured out allopathic medicine and psychology/Psychiatry were not helpful to what ailed me. I read Dr. Hyman's books on the Mind and Body and took the information and fashioned my own treatments unique to me and my environment. Dr. Hyman's got a slick marketing site though, it kind of turned me off. But his data and research worked for me. The reason I got out of Nursing studies and went into law (Paralegal), was the focus on disease rather than wellness. At least with law you can find a cure to what ails the client, well most of the time if you have enough money :tongue: I researched pros and cons of allopathic and psychiatric arguments, if others were concerned about this as well and found very ancient arguments. So I wasn't the first to question the foundation of these practices.

I had so many things going wrong with me through 2003/2010 including a lower disc that had ruptured and cut off the nerves to my right leg. I had to drag my leg around for a couple years back in 2003-2005 and the pain was awful, 24/7, no insurance. No doctors would help me and Chiropractic worsened all the symptoms. I researched and researched what would work. Walking meditation was the best, it brought my reflex back but didn't stop the pain. I had to radically change my diet and move to the country to dump the pain.

_________________
Mind and mental events are concepts, mere postulations within the three realms of samsara Longchenpa .... A link to my Garden, Art and Foodie blog Scratch Living


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 12:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
If.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 6:26 pm
Posts: 639
Location: Mudhole? Slimy? My home, this is.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog ... rd-verdict

_________________
. . . there they saw a rock! But it wasn't a rock . . .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
Paulsen And Lunn's study is just one important piece of work indicating what many of us have been seeing for some years now.
To whit, that analysis based interventions are for most subjects far less effective than CBT.
There are of course variations and consequently differing outcomes between one form of analysis and another..Jungian analysis for example is notoriously poor at delivering satisfactory outcomes, despite the fact that at one time Jung was seen as embracing the truths of Dharma by some Buddhists...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:26 pm
Posts: 501
I've always thought that Jungian analysis was just right for Jung, it's the imitators that delivered a diff product because they didn't have the same sensibility. There are a few notable Jungians who did their own thing. So do you think it comes down to the individual and the orientation of the client and the nature of the relationship. Jung never wanted to be imitated, did he?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
The fact is that all studies of Jungian therapy, and there have been many with no reason for bias , have shown little appreciable difference in the emotional lives and cognitive functioning and general well being of its clients.
The National Institute for Clinical Excellence which funds interventions given under the auspices of the British National Health Service will not license Jungian therapies as a viable option, they remain totally unconvinced that they are anything but a lifestyle choice for those who have been dubbed ' the worried well '.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:24 pm
Posts: 641
Location: Delaware
Nemo wrote:
I am getting tired of the OR and am too old to go back to paramedicine. I have some time and would like to learn an alternative healing art. There are many involved in such practices here. What are some of the best alternate methods of healing once you have burned out on Western medicine ? I am so tired of treating symptoms.


Other posters have offered some excellent suggestions, if you choose to remain focused on healing.

If you are looking for a different type of challenge that will utilize all your "biopsychosocial" and "Buddhist" skills, you may want to consider hospice. Your practice "rubber meets the road" here. No running away, no BS, just one being completely present to another. Surprisingly (or maybe not), you will receive more than you ever give. Not for everyone, of course.

Best wishes for whichever path you choose.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:38 pm
Posts: 239
There is a great deal of discussion in the world of psychotherapy about how effectiveness is measured, and even what constitutes an 'improvement'.
The UKCP (United Kingdom Council for Psychotherapy) which covers most modalities, is concerned about the validity of RCT's as a way of assessing psychotherapy. NICE also takes into account the cost/length of treatment and factors this into the forms of therapy it favours.

http://www.psychotherapy.org.uk/article961.html


The main UKCP site:
http://www.psychotherapy.org.uk/

_________________
“Don't you know that a midnight hour comes when everyone has to take off his mask? Do you think life always lets itself be trifled with? Do you think you can sneak off a little before midnight to escape this?”
― Søren Kierkegaard


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 6:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
Of course NICE does. Thats its job. To ensure that interventions are both effective and affordable.
Jungian therapy falls at the first hurdle. You will not find a Trust in the UK who would fund it ....
Which means that those who insist on Jungian Therapy have to go private...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group