I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
so how does buddhism reconcile with this? you know there are bunch of people saying that they were seeing a tunnel of light felt a loving presence, some interpret this as god other's as a state of bardo
nevertheless here are the facts
> a study than only 4% of people having near death experiences
http://link.springer.com/article/10.102 ... 078#page-1
> another study on people who had heart attacks were in death like coma without a working heart and most of them didn't have near death experiences, almost all of them turned to a rationalist-materialist
http://www.pentathon.talktalk.net/lancet.pdf
> there is the option that near death experiences are just hormonally induced accidental lucid dreams
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucid_dream
http://www.lucidity.com/NL32.OBEandLD.html
http://lnco.epfl.ch/files/content/sites ... rience.pdf
> or just rare hallucinations induced by oxygen depravation
http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... oof-heaven
> and in some case it's just people looking for attention
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/unide ... L/abstract
> there is an experiment in which scientist induced near death experiences in living people using a magnetic beam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCVzz96zKA0
nevertheless here are the facts
> a study than only 4% of people having near death experiences
http://link.springer.com/article/10.102 ... 078#page-1
> another study on people who had heart attacks were in death like coma without a working heart and most of them didn't have near death experiences, almost all of them turned to a rationalist-materialist
http://www.pentathon.talktalk.net/lancet.pdf
> there is the option that near death experiences are just hormonally induced accidental lucid dreams
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucid_dream
http://www.lucidity.com/NL32.OBEandLD.html
http://lnco.epfl.ch/files/content/sites ... rience.pdf
> or just rare hallucinations induced by oxygen depravation
http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... oof-heaven
> and in some case it's just people looking for attention
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/unide ... L/abstract
> there is an experiment in which scientist induced near death experiences in living people using a magnetic beam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCVzz96zKA0
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
There's plenty of documented cases of children recollecting past lives:
http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinic ... types-page
http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinic ... types-page
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
It's not 'proof'. You can find studies to support the opposite conclusion.
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
How is it possible to prove that there is no afterlife, when all you know about it is the time of its occurrence? You can say that hallucinations are not a proof of afterlife, but I hardly see a point in doing so. How can near death experience, be a proof of what happens after death? This makes no sense, right?gandy wrote:I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
Say what you think about me here.
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
University, medical school - that got me interested.Indrajala wrote:
There's plenty of documented cases of children recollecting past lives:
http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinic ... types-page
However the linked website states
I lost my interest.Children Who Claim to Remember Previous Lives
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
One proof is your own life and your own death. And all of your experiences of encountering death in one form or another.
These experiences maybe subtle, but it is what we have.
People are just seduced by the materialistic/nihilistic idea that there is nothing after death. But you are then pushing away your own experiences. People find comfort in thinking that life ends in death, and buddhism and the like are therefore unnecessary. When you are attached to the nihilistic view, you strenthen your view by clinging to the explanations of hallucinations etc..
In buddhism there are other sources of knowledge than what is accepted in science. Buddhism says there are supernormal faculties like the five eyes and five or six abhijña. According to Dharma these are a source of knowledge, but science labels them as "hallucinations" and even worse.
Humanity is a mass of people. When there are a hundred thousand, million, ten million or hundred million people holding a nihilistic view, this clinging by large masses creates a kind of relative or habitual reality, which is difficult to break through.
These experiences maybe subtle, but it is what we have.
People are just seduced by the materialistic/nihilistic idea that there is nothing after death. But you are then pushing away your own experiences. People find comfort in thinking that life ends in death, and buddhism and the like are therefore unnecessary. When you are attached to the nihilistic view, you strenthen your view by clinging to the explanations of hallucinations etc..
In buddhism there are other sources of knowledge than what is accepted in science. Buddhism says there are supernormal faculties like the five eyes and five or six abhijña. According to Dharma these are a source of knowledge, but science labels them as "hallucinations" and even worse.
Humanity is a mass of people. When there are a hundred thousand, million, ten million or hundred million people holding a nihilistic view, this clinging by large masses creates a kind of relative or habitual reality, which is difficult to break through.
svaha
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
One of my teachers once said that those who expect a blank absence after death will experience ( or not experience ) just that, until the conditions for that are exhausted.
“You don’t know it. You just know about it. That is not the same thing.”
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
what did you say to me?Simon E. wrote:One of my teachers once said that those who expect a blank absence after death will experience ( or not experience ) just that, until the conditions for that are exhausted.
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
I don't see how this is proof of no afterlife as none of these people actually died! You can't prove there is no afterlife, it's impossible.
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
Good Evening Grandy,
Thank you for your time and effort in digging out all these links, they are indeed very interesting and a good concept to cover.
I am not so sure what is taught or what you have learn regarding the rebirth concept in Buddhism, various schools could have taught this differently.
The rebirth concept I knew of is closely tied to karma, it is regarding the rebirth of the same karma across different lifetime, different generation at same or different places. Buddha taught the doctrine of anatman, no soul or no self, which means it has noting to do with afterlife.
An example of the rebirth here is Grandfather, Father, Grandson, concept. The grandfather of the family, when young, always push the blames (emiting negative karma) to others whenever something happens, the father in turn learns the same and continue doing the same thing. The grandson which in turns grows up learning the same thing, pushing the blame to other whenever something happen.
From this example, the rebirth of the same negative karma of pushing blames to others is reborn across generation.
If the father or the grandfather will to put a stop to the negative karma of pushing the blame to others, then the grandson will not learn this negative karma, and in returns, putting a stop to the rebirth of it.
Rebirth can also happens within self, one common example is that a person could have meditate till the extend of deep wisdom to understand what is anger and stop emitting anger, but one day, he could have been triggered by some negative experience and become very angry for that instance, and thus resulted in the rebirth of the same emotion he had put a stopped to it.
Think of us being in the same big ocean full of people, with everyone sending out ripples of emotion. Today the emotion of anger/blame or negative feeling could have happen at the same spot by different people at different time.
In the third noble truth, to reach enlightenment, is to put a stop to the craving of satisfaction, emitting negative karma and stopping the rebirth. Whether there is an afterlife and non-afterlife or a creator is not important, even Gautama buddha didn't endorse in a creator/god. Seeking a definite answer to this has noting to do with reaching enlightenment/ ending the suffering.
Maybe your understanding and what is taught by your school would be different. Here are my sources in regards to what I have posted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_in_Buddhism
http://buddhism.about.com/od/thefournob ... truths.htm
Finally, I wish that you would have a great weekend
Thank you for your time and effort in digging out all these links, they are indeed very interesting and a good concept to cover.
I am not so sure what is taught or what you have learn regarding the rebirth concept in Buddhism, various schools could have taught this differently.
The rebirth concept I knew of is closely tied to karma, it is regarding the rebirth of the same karma across different lifetime, different generation at same or different places. Buddha taught the doctrine of anatman, no soul or no self, which means it has noting to do with afterlife.
An example of the rebirth here is Grandfather, Father, Grandson, concept. The grandfather of the family, when young, always push the blames (emiting negative karma) to others whenever something happens, the father in turn learns the same and continue doing the same thing. The grandson which in turns grows up learning the same thing, pushing the blame to other whenever something happen.
From this example, the rebirth of the same negative karma of pushing blames to others is reborn across generation.
If the father or the grandfather will to put a stop to the negative karma of pushing the blame to others, then the grandson will not learn this negative karma, and in returns, putting a stop to the rebirth of it.
Rebirth can also happens within self, one common example is that a person could have meditate till the extend of deep wisdom to understand what is anger and stop emitting anger, but one day, he could have been triggered by some negative experience and become very angry for that instance, and thus resulted in the rebirth of the same emotion he had put a stopped to it.
Think of us being in the same big ocean full of people, with everyone sending out ripples of emotion. Today the emotion of anger/blame or negative feeling could have happen at the same spot by different people at different time.
In the third noble truth, to reach enlightenment, is to put a stop to the craving of satisfaction, emitting negative karma and stopping the rebirth. Whether there is an afterlife and non-afterlife or a creator is not important, even Gautama buddha didn't endorse in a creator/god. Seeking a definite answer to this has noting to do with reaching enlightenment/ ending the suffering.
Maybe your understanding and what is taught by your school would be different. Here are my sources in regards to what I have posted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_in_Buddhism
http://buddhism.about.com/od/thefournob ... truths.htm
Finally, I wish that you would have a great weekend
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 5:21 pm
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
Notice how you've selected similar stories? Now you won't find birds of a feather here. But you will elsewhere. When you all start confirming each other, and making plans, you will understand karma and rebirth. Change your ideas and you change societies.gandy wrote:so how does buddhism reconcile with this? you know there are bunch of people saying that they were seeing a tunnel of light felt a loving presence, some interpret this as god other's as a state of bardo
nevertheless here are the facts
> a study than only 4% of people having near death experiences
http://link.springer.com/article/10.102 ... 078#page-1
> another study on people who had heart attacks were in death like coma without a working heart and most of them didn't have near death experiences, almost all of them turned to a rationalist-materialist
http://www.pentathon.talktalk.net/lancet.pdf
> there is the option that near death experiences are just hormonally induced accidental lucid dreams
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucid_dream
http://www.lucidity.com/NL32.OBEandLD.html
http://lnco.epfl.ch/files/content/sites ... rience.pdf
> or just rare hallucinations induced by oxygen depravation
http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... oof-heaven
> and in some case it's just people looking for attention
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/unide ... L/abstract
> there is an experiment in which scientist induced near death experiences in living people using a magnetic beam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCVzz96zKA0
- KathyLauren
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:22 pm
- Location: East Coast of Canada
- Contact:
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
You have proved that near-death experiences are not an afterlife. Congratulations. However, anyone giving the issue more than a moment's thought would have come to the same conclusion without the neeed for a lot of research. Near-death is not death. There never was any reason to assume that what happens in a near-death situation has anything to do with what happens after death.
Om mani padme hum
Keith
Om mani padme hum
Keith
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
gandy wrote:so how does buddhism reconcile with this?
There is no afterlife, just one long bardo that begins with delusion and ends with awakening.
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
Indeed: NDE = Non Death Experience. Close perhaps, but not the same thing.KeithBC wrote:You have proved that near-death experiences are not an afterlife. Congratulations. However, anyone giving the issue more than a moment's thought would have come to the same conclusion without the neeed for a lot of research. Near-death is not death. There never was any reason to assume that what happens in a near-death situation has anything to do with what happens after death.
Om mani padme hum
Keith
Edwards: You are a philosopher. Dr Johnson: I have tried too in my time to be a philosopher; but, I don't know how, cheerfulness was always breaking in.
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
Besides of the obvious point that near death expirience is not death you should think that there is no scientific way of determing if there is a consciousness or not in things. This sucks. Anesthesia works with a mix of chemicals that 1: Gives you amnesia, 2: Paralyses your body so we dont even have a way of knowing if the anesthesia actually works because we dont have a device that shows if people are conscious or not. People could be suffering a lot and may not be able to express it and then dont recall it.
One has to understand that consciousness is still a mistery in modern science. 100 years from now, consciousness wasn't even a topic of debate. As fransisco varela said, it was "unpolite" to throw the topic of consciousness in neurobiology discussion.
On the other hand there have been extensive studies of children who recall past lifes. If i remember the name of that man ( i believe it was a psychiatrist from some usa university) ill post it. The most interesting experiment that i heard of being done in this day's is on tulkus that remain in the clear light of death for days. Aparrently the brain gives like a signal just before it dies and that is like a unique print (similar to fingers) They were studying to tulkus to see if it match whit the new rebirth.
I wish more money was spent on this kind of stuff =)
One has to understand that consciousness is still a mistery in modern science. 100 years from now, consciousness wasn't even a topic of debate. As fransisco varela said, it was "unpolite" to throw the topic of consciousness in neurobiology discussion.
On the other hand there have been extensive studies of children who recall past lifes. If i remember the name of that man ( i believe it was a psychiatrist from some usa university) ill post it. The most interesting experiment that i heard of being done in this day's is on tulkus that remain in the clear light of death for days. Aparrently the brain gives like a signal just before it dies and that is like a unique print (similar to fingers) They were studying to tulkus to see if it match whit the new rebirth.
I wish more money was spent on this kind of stuff =)
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
Yup..Malcolm wrote:gandy wrote:so how does buddhism reconcile with this?
There is no afterlife, just one long bardo that begins with delusion and ends with awakening.
“You don’t know it. You just know about it. That is not the same thing.”
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
brb rasing the dead for an interview that will suit your special needsudawa wrote:
Indeed: NDE = Non Death Experience. Close perhaps, but not the same thing.
Re: I have some proof here that there's no afterlife
so it was in their karma to have hallucinations?invisiblediamond wrote: Notice how you've selected similar stories? Now you won't find birds of a feather here. But you will elsewhere. When you all start confirming each other, and making plans, you will understand karma and rebirth. Change your ideas and you change societies.
nice, now pull out a suttra that demonstrates it