If we were to take away the meaning.....then one is left with a statement/expression
.....meeting of minds?.....
yes, while the statement/expression remains, it is open to interpretation by others.oushi wrote:Statement/expression means something, so you took away only part of the meaning.
What do you have in mind?.....meaning is not only dedicated to human relations.
oushi wrote:People trying to express things, provide statements which are based on meaning. What is this meaning? If a meaning is solid and unshakable, it becomes truth. So things are true if they have solid meaning. But meaning, by definition, is only relation to the object it describes, not the object itself. We intellectually know if we "posses" meaning. Echo of an experience is being crystallized into meaning, which is then taken as truth. It can be said, that we know through meaning. "Self" is a meaning of experiences experienced by individual. Asking about "self" will be just asking for different meaning. But if we take away meaning, the what? What do we take away and what is left?

Nothing wrote:yes, while the statement/expression remains, it is open to interpretation by others.
Nothing wrote:What do you have in mind?
muni wrote:When there is "one truth and at the same time many truths", no ground for any meaning is.
But I don't give up.
yes it does. Unless we take the entire statement/expression out completely.oushi wrote:Being open is also meaning.
ok, just an event, or we could say it is an effect.....the effect cannot happen without the right conditions.....furthermore, the effect cannot happen without the initial cause.When you see falling leafs, it means that winter is coming.
or to be understood!.....Maybe meaning is another dimension that needs to be sorted out?
oushi wrote:Meaninglessness is the ground, but what meaning is, and why is it so powerful? It seems that meaning draws attention, and triggers clinging, so it's like gravity that binds object together. That would explain human behavior, and desire to make everything perfect. But what for, when meaningless is already perfect? Maybe meaning is another dimension that needs to be sorted out?

oushi wrote:People trying to express things, provide statements which are based on meaning. What is this meaning? If a meaning is solid and unshakable, it becomes truth. So things are true if they have solid meaning. But meaning, by definition, is only relation to the object it describes, not the object itself. We intellectually know if we "posses" meaning. Echo of an experience is being crystallized into meaning, which is then taken as truth. It can be said, that we know through meaning. "Self" is a meaning of experiences experienced by individual. Asking about "self" will be just asking for different meaning. But if we take away meaning, the what? What do we take away and what is left?
muni wrote:oushi wrote:Meaninglessness is the ground, but what meaning is, and why is it so powerful? It seems that meaning draws attention, and triggers clinging, so it's like gravity that binds object together. That would explain human behavior, and desire to make everything perfect. But what for, when meaningless is already perfect? Maybe meaning is another dimension that needs to be sorted out?
Our human mind in its misperception already is clinging, focussing to truly existences. My mind takes phenomena for real - solid, so looks for a meaning.
The meaning of meaningfull expressions or phenomena which liberate, cannot be realized when there is investigation in a conceptual meaning of the solid phenomena/words.
What you say about desire to make everything perfect, to modelate phenomena is indeed a trigger to keep the movie turning.
Easy to say, but in that way I see the meaning of your words.
oushi wrote: When you do not see meaning anywhere, who/what are you to yourself?


oushi wrote:So, what is the meaning of meaning?

ground wrote:It "means"
oushi wrote:ground wrote:It "means"
![]()
Meaning is empty. In other words, there is no meaning of meaning. It's just a meaningless agreement. "if... then..."

ground wrote:oushi wrote:ground wrote:It "means"
![]()
Meaning is empty. In other words, there is no meaning of meaning. It's just a meaningless agreement. "if... then..."
"empty" may cause the dependent arising of meaning aka consciousness. "meaning" may cause the dependent arising of meaning aka consciousness.
Why say "Meaning is empty" which means "Cause1 of meaning1 is cause2 of meaning2" (cause mode) or "Consciousness1 is consciousness2" (effect mode) . What does that mean?
oushi wrote:ground wrote:oushi wrote:Meaning is empty. In other words, there is no meaning of meaning. It's just a meaningless agreement. "if... then..."
"empty" may cause the dependent arising of meaning aka consciousness. "meaning" may cause the dependent arising of meaning aka consciousness.
Why say "Meaning is empty" which means "Cause1 of meaning1 is cause2 of meaning2" (cause mode) or "Consciousness1 is consciousness2" (effect mode) . What does that mean?
Meaning slowly dissolves into meaningless, true experience beyond concepts. Meaning is empty even from the "meaningful" point of view. I can say, stay in meaninglessness and it may be enough for some, but those that are attached to meaning won't even try. That is why I ask about meaning of meaning, so even without abandoning meaning, meaningless is naturally found. Same goes for the nature of nature, or emptiness of emptiness. This barrier mind cannot pass, as it is the gateless gate. That which passes, is not "that" not self, not other, not here, not there, and nothing opposite. All extremes dissolve when meaning is dropped (quite simple and logical).

ground wrote:What that means is that "you try to express yourself". But since the sense of self arises dependently the way it is expressed arises dependently too ... dependent on having seen forms (words) or heared sounds (words) of others and learned to fabricate meanings related to these forms and sounds .
Even the statement being taken out, it does not mean that there is no meaning, all this means is that the right conditions are not there for it to prosper..while the statement/expression remains, it is open to interpretation by others.....
.Being open is also meaning.....
.yes it does. Unless we take the entire statement/expression out completely.....
Meaning cannot simply be empty, that is a different thing."what is the meaning of meaning?"
That is the same as saying meaning has no meaning as it is empty.there is no meaning of meaning. It's just a meaningless agreement. "if...then..."
Users browsing this forum: Norwegian and 8 guests