by mindyourmind » Sun May 20, 2012 11:14 am
Jokes aside - I think that a part of the problem also maybe lies in the format itself, inherent in any discussion forum on the internet.
I think that for any discussion board to be really interesting, in the conventional, modern sense of the word, it has to have some contentious stuff, some arguments. We so love our dharma drama, our issues, being right, we showed them, we are right and have the real thing, they are not as bright as we are type stuff. For a discussion board to really function as such, there has to be drama, and conflict, at least to some extent. How mind-numbingly boring would we find a board where we always say "Yes, dharmakitty, you are so right. Again".
And that's where things get difficult. As dharma practitioners we should not really be involved in a lot of what goes on here. That is not the fault of DW. The fault lies with us, and with the very format of an internet discussion board. We want to argue, to be right, even if it is in that grim-buddhist-smile-i-love-you-but shutup-and-i-added-a-smiley-so-I'm-not-really-angry type of way.
I'm not trying to excuse or justify some of the behaviour on here at times, but we are trying to marry a contemplative, dharmic life-style and practice to a discussion board format. That will always bring challenges. Add some people's language challenges, some really slow learners in the reading comprehension fields and off we go - drama.
In other words, I don't believe that you can really ever have a properly "Buddhist" (in the tired, cliched sense of the word) discussion board that will be successful and "interesting".
I have this love-hate type of relationship with boards like this - I learn so much here, but there is also the argumentative, testosterone stuff which is really tedious.
As bad as bad becomes its not a part of you
Talk Talk