"No Thought" in Pao-T'ang Ch'an and early Atiyoga

A forum for scholastic discussion/debate.

"No Thought" in Pao-T'ang Ch'an and early Atiyoga

Postby Tiger » Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:58 pm

Namo Amitabha Buddha
Tiger
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:47 am

Re: "No Thought" in Pao-T'ang Ch'an and early Atiyoga

Postby Andrew108 » Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:45 pm


Why do you think it's a nice paper?
The Blessed One said:

"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.
Andrew108
 
Posts: 1502
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:41 pm

Re: "No Thought" in Pao-T'ang Ch'an and early Atiyoga

Postby Tiger » Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:54 pm

Andrew108 wrote:

Why do you think it's a nice paper?


For the historical analysis.
Namo Amitabha Buddha
Tiger
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:47 am

Re: "No Thought" in Pao-T'ang Ch'an and early Atiyoga

Postby Andrew108 » Thu Aug 16, 2012 2:07 pm

What historical analysis? I read the paper and didn't find any parallels between Ati and Ch'an. In fact I thought that his analysis of 'no thought' in Ati was incomplete and misjudged. But what can you expect from an Academic who wrote this paper back in 1985. I also found it strange that he didn't quote from Dzogchen tantras.
In fact if you are sincerely interested in the Ati view and how it might be the same or different to Ch'an, then you have to read the original Ati/Dzogchen tantras.
I'm all in favor of informed debate but I'm not sure how much trust I put in academic papers like the one you linked to.
The Blessed One said:

"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.
Andrew108
 
Posts: 1502
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:41 pm

Re: "No Thought" in Pao-T'ang Ch'an and early Atiyoga

Postby Malcolm » Thu Aug 16, 2012 2:08 pm

Tiger wrote:
Andrew108 wrote:

Why do you think it's a nice paper?


For the historical analysis.



This article is quite outdated. This is a much more recent, more informed, and a more nuanced presentation of the interaction of Chan and Atiyoga in Tibet:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/49744856/Ligh ... -Mig-Sgron
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

Though there are infinite liberating gateways of Dharma,
there are none not included in the dimension of the knowledge of the Great Perfection.

-- Buddha Samantabhadri
User avatar
Malcolm
 
Posts: 11768
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: "No Thought" in Pao-T'ang Ch'an and early Atiyoga

Postby Tiger » Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:33 pm

Thank you.
Namo Amitabha Buddha
Tiger
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:47 am


Return to Academic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Soar and 7 guests

>