lotwell wrote:Personally I am looking towards the academic route. I have taken a semester of Tibetan and am starting to learn Chinese (at university) and Nepali (at work). I'm quite good with languages and grammar and would like to bring this skill to Buddhism Studies. My fantasy is unearthing ancient texts in remote monasteries and translating them. In reality I would more likely but looking at sitting in front of a computer all day translating works no one will ever read.
Kirtu makes a good point about the academic side of Buddhism. It certainly does not remove suffering itself and in fact could be performed by a non-Buddhist uninterested in nirvana, enlightenment, eliminating suffering, etc. But many of the great masters (Thich Nhat Hanh and HHDL come to mind) and all (or many) monastics are trained in a traditional "academic"/scholarly methods alongside the practice elements.
Huseng wrote:
I don't know why a lot of people assume study is not practice. It is after all listening (or reading), contemplating and implementing in one's own mind the Buddha's teachings. Anything that complements it is worthwhile to a certain extent.
lotwell wrote:My fantasy is unearthing ancient texts in remote monasteries and translating them. In reality I would more likely but looking at sitting in front of a computer all day translating works no one will ever read.
Namdrol wrote:lotwell wrote:My fantasy is unearthing ancient texts in remote monasteries and translating them. In reality I would more likely but looking at sitting in front of a computer all day translating works no one will ever read.
The reality, if you can actually get a teaching position, is that you will spend your days teaching world religion classes to freshman who don't care and survey courses on Buddhism, and in the evening writing papers because of the publish or die phemomena that is pervasive in academia. You will get little translation done.
N
Tewi wrote:If I had my life to live over again, I would go to Ranjung Yeshe / Kathmandu University. (It wasn't around back when I was of an age to go, but I've visited over the years.) The main drawback is that rightly or wrongly, other academics tend to look down on (or just not pay any attention to) degrees from the third world.
This will be an issue if you want to use the degree to apply for further study, or teaching jobs. On the other hand, you'll come out speaking and reading fluent Tibetan, Nepali, and who knows what else. And they've got some fine faculty to guide you in the academic stuff. Also,since RY/KU only offers the BA and MA (in "Buddhist Studies with Himalayan Language"--oh how I love that name!), the drawbacks I mentioned would matter less than they would for a Ph.D. program.
Universities or academic programs run by dharma centers, or closely associated with them, have a poor reputation. Most are expensive (but not Foguangshan or UWest, which might even be free), some are doctrinaire (but perhaps this is what you want), and most have low admissions standards. Naropa has been called a party school (my information is from two decades ago, though), while Maitripa and Namgyal Ithaca are unaccredited. Anyway, it would be very easy to place Ranjung Yeshe in this company, although I like them.
kirtu wrote:What's the deal with visa requirements? I thought that Westerners could only stay 150 days of the year total in Nepal? And in India it's 3 months now with a mandatory 2 months out of India?
Kirt
lotwell wrote:Lots of Good information here! Thank you!
The Rangjung Yeshe Institute sounds more appealing after reading the other post about the present state of academia...
Lotwell
Adamantine wrote:lotwell wrote:Lots of Good information here! Thank you!
The Rangjung Yeshe Institute sounds more appealing after reading the other post about the present state of academia...
Lotwell
Kathmandu is a quite polluted and unstable city. It can be a shock to one's body and mind. Of course, it is brimming with sacred spaces... but I'd suggest visiting before you commit to spending year/s there. It all depends on how sensitive your body is to that level of pollution.
Huseng wrote:Adamantine wrote:lotwell wrote:Lots of Good information here! Thank you!
The Rangjung Yeshe Institute sounds more appealing after reading the other post about the present state of academia...
Lotwell
Kathmandu is a quite polluted and unstable city. It can be a shock to one's body and mind. Of course, it is brimming with sacred spaces... but I'd suggest visiting before you commit to spending year/s there. It all depends on how sensitive your body is to that level of pollution.
Around Boudha it ain't so bad.
Adamantine wrote:I usually stay in Boudha and my body generally goes into a type of toxic-shock allergy hay-fever from all the burning garbage and cheap fuel mixed with dust in the air at all times. If I was to live there, I'd prefer to be out of the city at least a little ways-- like Sankhu or Parphing. That said, I'm sure the air is cleaner during the rainy season..
Huseng wrote:Adamantine wrote:I usually stay in Boudha and my body generally goes into a type of toxic-shock allergy hay-fever from all the burning garbage and cheap fuel mixed with dust in the air at all times.
Much of India is like that, too. Dry, dusty, full of airborne contaminants from all the burning rubbish and who knows what else.
On the sub-continent it is common for people to toss their plastic rubbish in a heap and burn it right on a busy street.
But when you have no proper trash disposal services, then your options are limited. I don't know if burning the plastic is better or worse than dumping it into the local river...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests