Dear Ngawang Drolma,
thanks for your response. True, we can't all be Loppöns, but that's not what I requested nor could request, being far from such qualification. Besides I noted that there are truly qualifying posts.
I read the rules closely of course but they are probably not precise enough for many people (well, see for yourself). Giving references would be a good start, but that's also not all there is to academic arguments. That's why I thought it might be good to clarify these terms for those who are not used to that kind of discussion.
Probably I'm just being overly critical, taking the adjective "academic" far too literal, and it might be better to just keep on watching these issues for a bit longer. In that case I kindly ask to be ignored
The core intent of my thought is though, that people could benefit greatly from productive and constructive academic discussions and that therefore, the academical quality of posts shouldn't be taken too lightly. That is _if_ and only if this shall be an academic forum and not just another part of the forum with the sole difference that this part focuses on "boring stuff" like scriptures, definitions etc. (being cynical here).
Oh well, let's just wait and see...